An Understanding of Buddhānussati in Buddhism: An Epistemological Analysis

Main Article Content

Phra Pongsit Voradhammo (Pohpetchleb)

Abstract

          This article aims to Understand of Buddhānussati in Buddhism through an epistemological analysis. It posits that Buddhānussati is not merely a conventional belief or a formalistic remembrance of the Buddha, but rather a cognitive mechanism that bridges existing knowledge with the development of new insights. In the dimension of prior knowledge—namely suta-maya-paññā (wisdom resulting from listening) and cintā-maya-paññā (wisdom resulting from reflection)—Buddhānussati functions as a conceptual framework and Sammā-diṭṭhi (Right View) that practitioners employ as a foundation to direct the orientation of the mind. Within the Theravāda tradition, this is perceived through the attributes of the Buddha (Buddhaguṇa) to instill Saddhā (faith) that catalyzes self-reliant effort. Conversely, in the Mahāyāna tradition, it involves the realization of Buddha-nature inherent in all sentient beings and a reliance on external supportive powers to arouse Bodhicitta. Epistemological analysis reveals that Buddhānussati serves as a bridge to a posteriori knowledge or bhāvanā-maya-paññā (wisdom resulting from mental development), which arises from direct experiential practice. This process facilitates a transition from perceiving the Buddha through personification (anthropomorphic form) toward attaining absolute truth through dhammādhiṭṭhāna (impersonal or truth-based orientation). The pragmatic outcome is the eradication of Avijjā (ignorance) by calming and purifying the mind until it perceives reality as it truly is (yathā-bhūta-ñāṇa-dassana). In Theravāda, this culminates in the realization of Tilakkhaṇa (the Three Marks of Existence) through the mind and body; whereas in Mahāyāna, it unveils the primordial nature of enlightenment and the state of pure Śūnyatā (Emptiness). Consequently, Buddhānussati in an epistemological context signifies the process of restructuring the cognitive framework of the mind—transitioning from faith grounded in scriptural data to wisdom derived from internal awakening. Its ultimate objective is the cessation of suffering and the realization of the supreme truth in Buddhism.

Article Details

Section
Academic Articles

References

มหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย. (2539). พระไตรปิฎกภาษาไทย ฉบับมหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย. กรุงเทพมหานคร: โรงพิมพ์มหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย.

พระพุทธโฆสะ. (2546). คัมภีร์วิสุทธิมรรค. แปลและเรียบเรียงโดย สมเด็จพระพุฒาจารย์ (อาจ อาสภมหาเถร). พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 4 . กรุงเทพมหานคร : บริษัท ประยูรวงศ์พริ้นท์ติ้ง จำกัด.

สมเด็จพระพุทธโฆษาจารย์ (ป.อ. ปยุตฺโต). (2546). พจนานุกรมฉบับพุทธศาสตร์ ฉบับประมวลธรรม. กรุงเทพมหานคร: บริษัท อมรินทร์ พริ้นติ้ง จำกัด.

Bukkyo Dendo Kyokai (BDK). (2003). The Three Pure Land Sutras. Berkeley: Numata Center for Buddhist Translation and Research.

David J.Kalupahana. (1992). A History of Buddhist Philosophy. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

P. Williams. (2009). Mahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

Shantideva. (2006). The Way of the Bodhisattva. Padmakara Translation Group, Trans. Shambhala.