DEFECTIVE PARADIGM OF VERBS IN MODERN KOREAN
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this research were to 1) analyze the meanings of defective verbs; and 2) analyze the characteristics and grammatical functions of defective verbs. The electronic data in Korean language used in this research was collected and gathered from Korean corpus which appears on the website of Center for Digital Humanities, Korea University and the National Institute of Korean Studies Standard Korean Dictionary. The results indicate that 1) defective verbs are defined as the verbs with irregular inflectional forms of a lexical category, which causes the missing in a number of words and a gap in the conjugation table; and 2) characteristics and grammatical functions of defective verbs can be inflected with some inflectional ending and they can act as a relational subordinate clause, adverbial subordinate clauses, predicates, and expressions. Most of these verbs cannot act as a predicate in the main sentence, for example, “뎅기열은 어린이사망의 주된 원인으로 꼽혔다. (Dengue fever is counted as the leading cause of death in children).” “주되다 (main)” can only be inflected with “-ㄴ (-n)” while “주된”, which modifies the following noun “원인 (cause)”, acts as a relational subordinate clause in order to elaborate the main verb of a sentence which can lead to a complete theme. If words and sentence forms, which contain defective verbs, are researched and recognized, it will help enhance communication in modern Korean language to be more precise, accurate, efficient and well-accepted.
Article Details
References
สำนักงานราชบัณฑิตยสภา. (2560). พจนานุกรมศัพท์ภาษาศาสตร์ (ภาษาศาสตร์ทั่วไป)
ฉบับราชบัณฑิตยสภา. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักงาน.
Baerman, M. (2010), Defective paradigms : missing forms and that what they
tell us, Oxford University.
고려대학교 민족문화연구원(2022),『고려대 한국어대사전』, 고려대 민족문화연구원.
고려대학교 민족문화연구원 전자인문학센터(2022), 「물결 21 코퍼스」, http://corpus.korea.ac.kr/
국립국어원편(2021), 『표준국어대사전』, 두산동아, https://stdict.korean.go.kr/main/main.do
김종록(2009), 『(외국인을 위한) 표준 한국어 동사 활용사전』, 박이정.
이희자ㆍ이종희(2006), 『한국어 학습용 어미ㆍ조사 사전』, 한국문화사.
강미진(2008),「현대 국어 불완전용언의 활용 양상 연구」, 울산대학교 교육대학원, 석사학위논문.
고영근(1987),「보충법과 불완전계열의 문제」, 『어학연구』 23(서울대), 505-526.
구본관 외(2018), 『한국어 문법 총론 I』, 집문당.
김영욱(1994),「불완전계열에 대한 형태론적 연구」, 『국어학』24, 87-491.
나찬연(2012),『현대 국어 문법의 이해』, 월인.
남기심•고영근(2008),『표준국어문법론』, 탑출판사.
송철의(2009),「곡용과 활용의 불규칙에 대하여」, 『국어 형태ㆍ의미의 탐색』, 역락, 47-70.
이은정(1974),「안옹긑풀이씨(불완전용언)처리에 대한 고찰」, 『한글』153, 한글학회, 575-603.
이익섭(2007),『국어학개설』, 학연사.
정경재(2008),「불완전계열의 변화 방향 고찰」, 『형태론』 10-1, 박이정, 19-38.
최현배(1956),「안갖은 움직씨 “닥다”에 대하여-“닥아”와 “다가”의 변」, 『한글』118, 29-32.
최현배(1977),『우리말본』, 정음사.
최형용(2003),『국어 단어의 형태와 통사-통사적 결합어를 중심으로-』, 태학사.
한송화(1990),「불완전풀이씨에 대한 연구」, 연세대학교 석사학위논문.
한송화(1997),「활용형에 제약이 있는 동사의 사전적 처리」, 『사전편찬학연구』 7, 43-78.
홍윤표(1977),「불구동사에 대하여」, 『이숭녕선생고희기념국어국문학논총』, 탑출판사.
황화상(2013),『현대국어 형태론』, 지식과교양.