The Effect of Proactive Learning Management in Thai Language on Ability in the Use of Language for Communication in Teaching and Learning of the First-year Students of the Faculty of Education Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University

Authors

  • Piyaphat Nithitakkharanon Faculty of Education Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University
  • Apinya Sookchuay Faculty of Education Sisaket Rajabhat University

Keywords:

proactive learning management, Thai language subject, the ability to use language for communication

Abstract

          The purposes of this research were 1) to study the effect of active learning management in Thai language on the ability to use language for communication in teaching and learning of students in the Faculty of Education, Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, and 2) to compare language ability for communication in teaching and learning before and after the experiment of students studying with active learning activities in Thai language and students who have not studied with active learning activities. The sample was 60 students in faculty of Education, Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University. The research instrument was consist of active learning activities plan in Thai language and language ability test for communication in teaching and learning. The statistics used for data analysis are the mean, standard deviation and T-test.

            The research findings were as follows:

  1. Students who studied Thai language with the process of active learning received their learning achievement in using language for communication in teaching and learning with an average score of 9.02 for the pretest and 23.67 for the posttest. After the experiment, the research findings indicated that the students who studied Thai language with the process of active learning statistically received a higher score than their pretest score at the significance level of .05
  2. The ability to use language for communication in teaching and learning of the students who studied Thai language with the process of active learning had an average score of 23.67 and 19.51. The research found that the students who studied Thai language with the process of active learning statistically had a higher ability to use language for communication in teaching and learning than before studying Thai language with the process of active learning at the significance level of .05

References

นนทลี พรธาดาวิทย์. (2559). การจัดการเรียนรู้แบบ Active learning (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 2). กรุงเทพฯ: ทริปเพิ้ล เอ็ดดูเคชั่น.

Prontadavit, N. (2016). Active Learning Management (2nd ed). Bangkok: Triple Education. [in Thai].

ปราวีณยา สุวรรณณัฐโชติ. (2551). การเรียนรู้เชิงรุก (Active Learning). กรุงเทพฯ: จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.

Suwannatthachote, P. (2008). Active Learning. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai].

เรียม ศรีทอง. (2542). พฤติกรรมมนุษย์กับการพัฒนาตน. กรุงเทพฯ: เธิร์ดเวฟ เอ็ดดูเคชั่น.

Sritong, R. (1999). Human Behavior and Self-Development. Bangkok: Third Wave Education. [in Thai].

วัชรา เล่าเรียนดี, ปรณัฐ กิจรุ่งเรือง และอรพิณ ศิริสัมพันธ์. (2560). กลยุทธ์การจัดการเรียนรู้เชิงรุกเพื่อพัฒนาการคิดและยกระดับคุณภาพการศึกษา สำหรับศตวรรษที่ 21 (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 12). นครปฐม: เพชรเกษมพริ้นติ้ง.

Laowreandee, W., Kitroongrueng, P. & Sirisamphan, O. (2017). Active learning instructional strategies for thinking development and educational improvement of the 21st century (12th ed). Nakhon Pathom: Phetkasem Printing. [in Thai].

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ. (2559). แผนพัฒนาเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ ฉบับที่ 12. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักงานคณะกรรมการพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ.

Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. (2016). The Eleventh National Economic and Social Development Plan (2017-2011). Bangkok: Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. [in Thai].

เสาวณีย์ สิกขาบัณฑิต. (2534). การเขียนสำหรับสื่อการสื่อสาร (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 2). กรุงเทพฯ: ดวงกมล.

Sikkhabandit, S. (1991). Writing for communication media (2nd ed). Bangkok: Duangkamon. [in Thai].

Lemke, Cheryl. (2010). “Innovative Through Technology,” 21st Century Skills. In James Bellanca and Ron Brandt (eds). Rethinking How to Students Learn. p. 246, 267. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.

Lorenzen, M. (2001). Active learning and library instruction. Illinois Libraries, 83(2), 19-24.

Raymond, A. (1997). Inconsistency between a beginning elementary school teacher’s mathematics beliefs and teaching practices. Journal Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 550-576.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Nithitakkharanon, P., & Sookchuay, A. (2020). The Effect of Proactive Learning Management in Thai Language on Ability in the Use of Language for Communication in Teaching and Learning of the First-year Students of the Faculty of Education Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University. Ubon Ratchathani Journal of Research and Evaluation, 9(1), 31–41. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ubonreseva/article/view/241970

Issue

Section

Research Articles