THE DEVELOPMENT OF A BLENDED LEARNING MODEL FOR CORE COURSES AND BASKETBALL INSTRUCTION METHODS TO PROMOTE BASKETBALL SKILLS FOR PHYSICAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

Authors

  • Phakamas Ratanabuth Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Education, Ramkhamhaeng University

Keywords:

Learning Management Model, Blended Learning, Core Course and Teaching Methods for Basketball

Abstract

This research aims to 1) study the current state of teaching and learning methods for core basketball courses in regular face-to-face classrooms and blended learning models combining face-to-face and online learning; 2) develop a blended learning model for core basketball courses and teaching methods to promote basketball skills; 3) study the effectiveness of the developed blended learning model; and 4) evaluate student satisfaction with the blended learning model. The research consisted of four steps: Step 1: Studying the current state of teaching and learning in core courses and basketball instruction methods. The sample group consisted of 51 Physical Education students from Ramkhamhaeng University and 5 interviewees. The research tools were 1) questionnaires and 2) interviews. Step 2: Developing and evaluating the effectiveness of blended learning. The research tools were 1) a component evaluation form and 2) a document evaluation form. Step 3: Pilot testing the blended learning model with 30 Physical Education students from Ramkhamhaeng University, selected using purposive sampling. The research tool was 1) a knowledge test with a reliability coefficient of 0.05 used two assessment tools: 1) a blended learning assessment tool, and 2) a basketball skills test with a reliability coefficient of 0.05. Step 4 involved evaluating satisfaction with the blended learning approach by surveying physical education students at Ramkhamhaeng University. The statistical methods used for data analysis included mean, standard deviation, dependent samples t-test, and qualitative content analysis.
The research results found that:
1. The current state of learning management in regular face-to-face and online classrooms for core courses and basketball teaching methods is generally at a high level. Regarding blended learning approaches, it was found that the content must be up-to-date and aligned with the objectives, diverse technologies and media should be used in learning, and they should be appropriately applied.
2. The results of developing a blended learning model, which combines face-to-face classroom learning with online learning, known as the IKCPP MODEL, consisting of 5 steps: 1) Introductory phase, 2) Knowledge sharing phase, 3) Checking understanding phase, 4) Product design phase, and 5) Reflection phase, showed an overall high level of satisfaction with the model and supporting documents.
3. Outcomes from the blended learning model: Knowledge test results showed that post-test scores were significantly higher than pre-test scores (p < .05) Basketball skills test results also showed that post-test scores were significantly higher than pre-test scores (p < .05)
4. The overall satisfaction assessment regarding blended learning in traditional face-to-face and online classrooms, in terms of learning content, learning activities, media and resources, and learning assessment, was at a high level.

References

จินตวีร์ คล้ายสังข์. (2555). Desktop Publishing สู่ e-book เพื่อส่งเสริมการใฝ่รู้ของผู้เรียนยุคดิจิทัล. สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.

ฉัฐรส บัญชาชาญชัย. (2540). การสร้างแบบประเมินและแบบทดสอบทักษะกีฬาบาสเกตบอล สำหรับนักเรียนระดับมัธยมศึกษาตอนต้น. ปริญญานิพนธ์การศึกษามหาบัณฑิต สาขาวิชาพลศึกษา มหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ ประสานมิตร.

ทิศนา แขมมณี. (2553). ศาสตร์การสอน: องค์ความรู้เพื่อการจัดกระบวนการเรียนรู้ที่มีประสิทธิภาพ (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 11). สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.

วิริยา บุญชัย. (2529). การทดสอบและการวัดผลทางพลศึกษา. ไทยวัฒนาพานิช.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7 - 74.

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). George Washington University.

Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674 - 681.

Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Brooks/Cole.Press.

Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11(1), 137 - 155.

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). Pfeiffer.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81 - 112.

Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. World Publishing Company.

Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer.

Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683 - 706.

Magill, R. A. (2011). Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2013). Evaluating evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education.

Mueller, J. (2005). The authentic assessment primer. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.

Peters, K. (2007). m-Learning: Positioning educators for a mobile, connected future. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(2), 1 - 17.

Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., Winstein, C., Wulf, G., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2018). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Human kinetics.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

Simon, M., & Forgette-Giroux, R. (2001). A rubric for scoring postsecondary academic skills. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(18), 1 - 4.

Downloads

Published

25-12-2025

How to Cite

Ratanabuth, P. (2025). THE DEVELOPMENT OF A BLENDED LEARNING MODEL FOR CORE COURSES AND BASKETBALL INSTRUCTION METHODS TO PROMOTE BASKETBALL SKILLS FOR PHYSICAL EDUCATION STUDENTS. Valaya Alongkorn Review Journal, 15(3), 213–227. retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/var/article/view/288357