A Study of the Policy Recommendation for the Development of Extra Small College of the Office of the Vocational Education Commission

Main Article Content

Ittipat Somju
Achara Niyamabha

Abstract

           This study aimed to identify the key components for developing educational institutions in alignment with vocational education standards. A qualitative research approach was employed, comprising an extensive review of relevant literature and in-depth interviews with seven experts, including vocational education administrators, professional standards specialists, representatives from the industrial sector, and vocational education policy researchers. The collected data were analyzed using content analysis techniques to synthesize a comprehensive framework for managing vocational educational institutions, particularly within the context of small-sized vocational colleges.
           The findings revealed six essential components for managing vocational educational institutions in accordance with vocational education standards: 1) Curriculum and Skills Management, which ensures alignment with labor market demands and professional standards. 2) Staff and Educational Technology Development, focusing on enhancing the capabilities of educators to meet the demands of 21st -century learning 3) Educational Quality and Occupational Standard Assurance, which involves the systematic assessment of students' competencies and external professional certification. 4) Budget Administration and Resource Mobilization, emphasizing efficiency, transparency, and collaborative resource management. 5) Stakeholder Engagement, fostering partnerships with industries, communities, and related organizations. 6) Student Development and Soft Skills, promoting holistic student development in terms of ethics, life skills, and adaptability.
           These six components are consistent with existing literature and expert insights, and they offer a practical framework for improving the quality and effectiveness of vocational education management. This framework is particularly suited to the unique challenges and needs of small-sized vocational colleges, supporting their sustainable development in response to the dynamic changes of the 21st -century economy and society.

Article Details

How to Cite
Somju, I., & Niyamabha, A. (2026). A Study of the Policy Recommendation for the Development of Extra Small College of the Office of the Vocational Education Commission. Vocational Education Innovation and Research Journal, 10(1), 132–144. retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ve-irj/article/view/292130
Section
Academic article

References

P. Wongpom, P. Pongnimit, P. Pongphinyayo, and S. Sroinam, “A model of educational institution administration toward international standards of vocational institutions under the Office of the Vocational Education Commission,” Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya Nakhonratchasima Journal, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 3826–3842, Oct. 2019.

Y. Zhang, “Organizational structures of vocational colleges in the United States,” Journal article, 2022.

J. Liu and X. Li, “Organizational structure and its impact on vocational educational institution effectiveness,” Journal article, 2021.

N. Buranachan et al., “Factors affecting the effectiveness of educational administration in private vocational schools,” Research article, Thailand, 2015.

W. Mongkhun et al., “Components of quality management administration models for private vocational colleges,” Research article, Thailand, 2015.

J. Phala et al., “Strategic management of private vocational education institution administrators in the upper northern region of Thailand,” Research article, Thailand, 2015.

D. Limthong et al., “Administration of vocational education institutions in fine arts programs based on the concept of imaginative innovation,” Research article, Thailand, 2022.

N. Uchuphap et al., “Marketing strategies for vocational education administration in the Thailand 4.0 era,” Research article, Thailand, 2022.

R. Traimalai, P. Phonsaram, and P. Nilsuk, “Current conditions of vocational education institution management under the Office of the Vocational Education Commission,” Research article, Thailand, 2019.

W. Mankalapisalkul, “Administrative guidelines based on vocational education standards,” Research article, Thailand, 2015.

A. Sinprasong et al., “Administrative guidelines for educational institutions based on vocational education standards under Khon Kaen Provincial Vocational Education,” Research article, Thailand, 2015.

K. Chanda-at et al., “Administrative practices in vocational education institutions,” Research article, Thailand, 2021.

S. Treephet et al., “An administrative model of science-based technology colleges in vocational education institutions,” Research article, Thailand, 2015.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Learning for Jobs. Paris, France: OECD, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/education/learningforjobs.htm

UNESCO-UNEVOC, Mapping Vocational Qualification Frameworks across Asia-Pacific, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://unevoc.unesco.org

U.S. Department of Education, Expanding Credential Opportunities Through Stackable Credential Pathways, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.ed.gov/news

Office of the Vocational Education Commission, Vocational Education Quality Assurance Guidelines. Bangkok, Thailand, 2019.

Thailand Professional Qualification Institute (TPQI), National Occupational Standards Framework. Bangkok, Thailand, 2020.

UNESCO-UNEVOC, Quality Assurance Frameworks for TVET Institutions in Asia-Pacific, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://unevoc.unesco.org

World Bank, Public–Private Partnerships for Education: Evidence from Developing Countries. Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.worldbank.org

UNESCO, Rethinking Education: Towards a Global Common Good? Paris, France: UNESCO, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org