SCIENTIFIC LITERACY OF SCIENCE EDUCATION STUDENTS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE APPROPRIATENESS OF THE COMPETENCY MODEL AND TEST METHOD

Main Article Content

Saranya Rurkkhum
Nitikorn Onyon
Orasa Charoontham

Abstract

This study employed a qualitative research method to investigate the scientific literacy and the appropriateness of the test method used among science education students. The focus group discussion was implemented with seven subject matter experts in the fields of science education and science education teaching. Content analysis and thematic coding were employed to analyze the data. The findings revealed that scientific literacy for science education students was comprised of three competencies: Explain phenomena scientifically, Construct and evaluate designs for scientific enquiry and interpret scientific data and evidence critically and Research, evaluate and use scientific information for decision making and action. Additionally, scientific literacy among science education students should be assessed by employing a test method that involves assigned situations, asking students to provide either a few words or a short paragraph in response. This test method must be aligned with three competencies in scientific literacy. Specifically, although these three competencies were originally developed for students aged 15 years old, they can be effectively used to assess scientific literacy among science education students. Scientific literacy is not limited by age; however, it has a continuous nature that can be analyzed deeply depending on the educational level. Additionally, the short essay examination format is appropriate for assessing scientific literacy among science education students. This test format, with a clear rubric, enables students to demonstrate their critical thinking skills, highlight their communication abilities, and apply their knowledge.

Article Details

Section
บทความวิจัย

References

สถาบันส่งเสริมการสอนวิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี. (2561). กรอบการประเมินสมรรถนะความฉลาดรู้

วิทยาศาสตร์. กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ.

สถาบันส่งเสริมการสอนวิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี. (2565). PISA 2022: ผลการประเมิน PISA ด้านคณิตศาสตร์

วิทยาศาสตร์ และการอ่านของนักเรียนไทย. สถาบันส่งเสริมการสอนวิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี.

สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา. (2560). การประเมิน PISA 2015: บทเรียนสำหรับการปฏิรูปการศึกษาของ

ประเทศไทย. สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา.

สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา. (2560). ตัวชี้วัดด้านการศึกษาไทยตามกรอบเป้าหมายการพัฒนาที่ยั่งยืน.

กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ.

Bacanak, A., & Gökdere, M. (2009). Science teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs towards scientific

literacy. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(1), 74–84.

Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Heinemann.

Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012). Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS):

Measuring undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific information and arguments. CBE—Life

Sciences Education, 11(4), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026

Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The nature of science education for responsible

citizenship. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 55–67.

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education. OECD Publishing.

https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing.

https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2018-results-volume-i_5f07c754-en

Pahrudin, A. (2019). Science literacy of prospective physics teachers. Journal of Physics:

Conference Series, 1157(4), 042040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042040

Rubini, B., Sumarmin, R., & Effendi, J. (2016). Enhancing science literacy of junior high school

students through inquiry-based learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 755(1),

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/012003

United Nations. (2023). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023.

https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-

pdf