A Bibliometric Analysis of International Research Publications by Academic Staff of the Behavioral Science Research Institute, Srinakharinwirot University in Scopus (2019–2024)

Authors

  • Charin Suwanwong Behavioral Science Research Institute, Srinakharinwirot University
  • Sompejch Junlabuddee Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Khon Kaen University
  • Wassana Wongpech Behavioral Science Research Institute, Srinakharinwirot University

Keywords:

Bibliometric analysis, Scopus, SciVal, International articles

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze internationally published research articles indexed in the Scopus database between 2019 and 2024, authored by the academic staff at the Behavioral Science Research Institute (BSRI), Srinakharinwirot University. A total of 92 articles were included in the analysis, which examined the subject areas of the publications, the journals in which they were published, journal quality based on quartile rankings, the extent of national and international research collaborations, and citation metrics based on data retrieved from Scopus and SciVal. The analysis revealed that the majority of publications (40 articles) were classified under the subject area of social sciences. Most articles were published in Quartile 2 ranked journals, with 30 articles (34.48%) meeting this quality criterion. Regarding research collaboration, 20 articles (21.74%) involved international co-authors, with 12 of these involving collaborators from six Asian countries. National collaborations accounted for 33 articles (35.87%). In terms of citation impact, 48 articles had been cited, with a total of 216 citations in Scopus. The most frequently cited topic clusters were “Social Media,” “Health Literacy,” and “COVID-19,” with a Prominence Percentile of 88.489, reflecting high visibility and recognition in the international research landscape. The study findings reflect key policy recommendations: the fact that most publications are in Q2 journals represents a strength of the institution that should be promoted and maintained. In contrast, the relatively low level of international collaboration highlights an opportunity to enhance the institution’s capacity for global academic cooperation. This insight can inform the development of concrete institutional policies or initiatives aimed at improving the quality and advancement of future research output.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Behavioral Science Research Institute. (2024). Annual report 2024. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1r2YA8ldtMct23d5PiE9HSvLP15bM8HVa/view [in Thai]

Bornmann, L., Ye, A., & Ye, F. (2018). Identifying landmark publications in the long run using field-normalized citation data. Journal of Documentation, 74(2), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-07-2017-0108

Brase, G. L. (2014). Behavioral science integration: A practical framework of multi-level converging evidence for behavioral science theories. New Ideas in Psychology, 33, 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.11.001

ElseVier. (2024, August 15). What is field-weighted citation impact (FWCI)?. https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/14894/supporthub/scopus/~/what-is-field-weighted-citation-impact-%28fwci%29%3F/

Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Didegah, F. (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21688

Getahun, D. A., Hammad, W., & Robinson-Pant, A. (2021). Academic writing for publication: Putting the ‘international’ into context. Research in Comparative and International Education, 16(2), 160–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999211009346

Glanz, K., & Bishop, D. B. (2010). The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annual Review of Public Health, 31, 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103604

Hanisch, S., & Eirdosh, D. (2023). Behavioral science and education for sustainable development: Towards metacognitive competency. Sustainability, 15(9), 7413. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097413

Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A. K. (2019). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219877678

Newton, C. R. (2020). Research and open access from low- and middle-income countries. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 62(5), 537. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14513

Ruggeri, K., Stock, F., Haslam, S. A., Capraro, V., Boggio, P., Ellemers, N., Cichocka, A., Douglas, K. M., Rand, D. G., van der Linden, S., Cikara, M., Finkel, E. J., Druckman, J. N., Wohl, M. J. A., Petty, R. E., Tucker, J. A., Shariff, A., Gelfand, M., Packer, D., Jetten, J., … Willer, R. (2024). A synthesis of evidence for policy from behavioural science during COVID-19. Nature, 625(7993), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06840-9

Purkayastha, A., Palmaro, E., Falk-Krzesinski, H. J., & Baas, J. (2019). Comparison of two article-level, field-independent citation metrics: Field-weighted citation impact (FWCI) and relative citation ratio (RCR). Journal of Informetrics, 13(2), 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.012

Salager-Meyer, F. (2008). Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.009

Srinakharinwirot University. (2023). Action plan for the fiscal Years (B.E. 2566–2570). Srinakharinwirot University. https://www.swu.ac.th/information/plan/SWU_Action_plan2023_2027.pdf

Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2015). Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 872–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.08.001

Wattanasiri, P., & Chansanam, W. (2024). An analysis research output on global library and information science: A bibliometric and altmetric analysis. Journal of the Thai Library Association, 17(1), 76–92. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tla_research/article/view/271281 [in Thai]

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Suwanwong, C., Junlabuddee, S., & Wongpech, W. (2025). A Bibliometric Analysis of International Research Publications by Academic Staff of the Behavioral Science Research Institute, Srinakharinwirot University in Scopus (2019–2024). The Periodical of Behavioral Science, 31(2), 1–21. retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/BSRI/article/view/283740