Needs Assessment of Learning Leadership Development for Secondary School Administrators

Main Article Content

Thira Bhawangkanantha
Sukit Phosirikul
Worawit Kuljirakarn
Thinnakorn Paknam
Surapon Tabtimhin

Abstract

The research objectives were to assess needs and guideline of learning development for secondary school administrators. The target group consisted of 410 principals and assistant principals of secondary schools under the Office of Basic Education Commission (OBEC). The sample group was derived with stratified random sampling technique. Data collecting tool was a 5-level rating scale questionnaire asking present and desirable conditions. The tool had the reliability of 0.92 and 0.96 respectively. Analytical data statistics were mean, percentage, and Modified Priority Needs Index (PNImodified) The findings are as the present condition of learning leadership of school administrators under the Secondary Educational Service Area Offices as a whole is at medium level. The desirable condition is at highest level. The needs for development exist in all dimensions. Team Learning dimension has the development needs at the highest (PNImodified = 0.38). The needs in descending order are Self-Directed Learning (PNImodified = 0.37), Integrating Pluralism (PNImodified = 0.36), Context-Oriented Transformation (PNImodified = 0.34), Employing Facilitating Technology and Innovation Learning in Digital (PNImodified = 0.33), and Creativity and Courage (PNImodified = 0.32). And learning leadership development guideline for secondary school principals consists of (1) development ratio 70:20:10 – 70 percent on the job training and off the job training, 20 percent on PLC (professional learning community) and personal feedback, and 10 percent on training; (2) development phases – phase 1 training, phase 2 integration with work practice, and phase 3 follow up and evaluation.

Article Details

How to Cite
Bhawangkanantha, T., Phosirikul, S., Kuljirakarn, W., Paknam, T., & Tabtimhin, S. (2022). Needs Assessment of Learning Leadership Development for Secondary School Administrators. Journal of Intellect Education, 1(2), 35–46. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IEJ/article/view/263079
Section
Research Article

References

สมชาย เทพแสง. (2557). ภาวะผู้นำแห่งการเรียนรู้: รูปแบบของภาวะผู้นำสมัยใหม่. วารสารบริหารการศึกษา มหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒประสานมิตร, 10(9), 1-11.

สุวิมล ว่องวาณิช. (2550). การวิจัยประเมินความต้องการจำเป็น. กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.

Curtis, T.A. (2012). Leading and learning: Leadership, change, and challenge in a professional development initiative. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1010625210?accountid=44809

DuFour, R., DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (2008). Revisiting professional learning communities at work: New insights for improving schools. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.

Erdogen, M. (2010). Sustainability in higher education: A needs assessment on a course “Education and awareness for sustainability”. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1-20.

Faber, E.I. (2009). Learning leadership: Exploring the development and reflections of undergraduate student leaders. https://search.proquest.com/docview/304853131?accountid=44809

Ferdous, T. and Razzak, B.M. (2012). Importance of training needs assessment in the banking sector of bangladesh: A case study on national bank limited (NBL). International Journal of Business and Management, 7(10), 63-73.

Hauer, J. and Quill, T. (2011). Educational needs assessment, development of learning objectives, and choosing a teaching approach. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 14, 503-508.

Inc.McCauley, C.D. (1986). The Center for Creative Leadership: Handbook of Leadership Development. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass Publishers.

International Mine Action Standards (IMAS). (2005). Data collection and needs assessment. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/6014196F2EC43D3B8525714F006A1D01-imas-2gen-nov05.pdf

Jolouch, A., Martinez, M. and Badia, J. (2013). Leadership for 21st Century Learning. New York: OECD Publishing.

Kangpheng, S. & Kunlong, S. (2016). 21st Century Curriculum Leadership Model. Teaching Documents for Course 210208, Curriculum Management and Teaching: Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University.

Kangpheng, S. & Kunlong, S. (2017). The Curriculum Leadership Model for the 21stCentury. Mahasarakham: Apichat Printing.

Khong-ngam, S., Wongwanich, S., and Piromsombat, C. (2014). Principals’ and Teachers’ Use of Evaluation Results for Student Learning in Science. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116 (2014) 1902 – 1907, doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.492

Kouzes, J. M. and Posner, B.Z. (2016). The Leadership Challenge: How to Get Extraordinary Things Done in Organizations. United States of America: Jossey-Bass.

Krejcie, R.V. and Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Education and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.

Maxwell, J.C. (1999). The 21 Indispensable Qualities of a Leader : Becoming the Person Others will Want to follow. Nashrille, TN: Thomas Nelson,

Metheney-Fisher, L. (2012). Learning to lead: How leaders in higher education learn to lead. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1033339903?accountid=44809

Noe, R.A., Hollenbeck, John R., Barry, Gerhart L. Wright, and Patrick M. (2011). Fundamentals of Human Resource Management. United Kingdom : McGraw-Hill.

Northouse, P.G. (2007). Leadership: theory and practice . 4th ed. Thousand Oaks : SAGE Publications.

Rabin, R. (2014). Blended Learning for Leadership : The CCL Approach. Greensboro : Center for Creative Leadership.