Key Steps and Characteristics for Successful Interdisciplinary Research: An Analytical Review
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
There is an increasing importance of the application of interdisciplinary research (IDR) in all kinds of disciplines over the past two decades as it helps to improve a researcher’s career and also enables them to compete successfully in the job market. The term “interdisciplinary” means collaboration and integration of different disciplines with aims to find or develop something new. However, IDR has many challenges, in terms of integrating different theories of different disciplines. So, it is very important to study and follow the systematic steps and characteristics of IDR for successful integration. This article has been framed through literature review from various available sources and then categorized using content analysis method. The article aims to describe 1. definition and importance of IDR; 2. steps of IDR; and 3. characteristics of IDR approach. The article defined IDR as a collaboration or synthesis of two or more disciplines to develop a better methodology for conducting complex research problems, identified the main steps of IDR as team formation, identifying the research problem, selecting collaborators, and a strong team leader for effective team management. Among the important characteristics of IDR includes clarity of objectives, sharing, adaptability, team members’ willingness to cooperate, team leader and management, flexibility, improvement in communication strategies, dedication, cooperation, and clarity of objectives for successful integration or synthesis of IDR. This review is expected to be helpful to future researchers, who need to adopt IDR methodology for solving complex research problems.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Aboelela, S. W., Larson, E., Bakken, S., Carrasquillo, O., Formicola, A., Glied, S. A., Haas, J., & Gebbie, K. M. (2007). Defining interdisciplinary research: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Services Research, 42(1p1), 329-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00621.x
Ashby, I., & Exter, M. (2019). Designing for interdisciplinarity in higher education: Considerations for instructional designers. TechTrends, 63(2), 202-208.
Balsiger, P. W. (2004). Supradisciplinary research practices: History, objectives and rationale. Futures, 36(4), 407-421.
Bark, R. H., Kragt, M. E., & Robson, B. J. (2016). Evaluating an interdisciplinary research project: Lessons learned for organisations, researchers and funders. International Journal of Project Management, 34(8), 1449-1459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.004
Bloschl, G., Carr, G., Bucher, C., Farnleitner, A. H., Rechberger, H., Wagner, W., & Zessner, M. (2012). Promoting interdisciplinary education-the Vienna Doctoral Programme on Water Resource Systems. Hydrology & Earth System Sciences, 16(2), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-457-2012
Borrego, M., & Newswander, L. K. (2008). Characteristics of successful cross‐disciplinary engineering education collaborations. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(2), 123-134.
Brewer, G. D. (1999). The challenges of interdisciplinarity. Policy sciences, 32(4), 327-337.
Brint, S. (2005). Creating the future: New directions in American research universities. Minerva, 43(1), 23-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-004-6620-4
Bruce, A., Lyall, C., Tait, J., & Williams, R. (2004). Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: The case of the Fifth Framework programme. Futures, 36(4), 457-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.003
Bruhn, J. G. (2000). Interdisciplinary research: A philosophy, art form, artifact or antidote? Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 35(1), 58-66.
Bruun, H., Hukkinen, J. I., Huutoniemi, K. I., & Thompson Klein, J. (2005). Promoting interdisciplinary research: The case of the Academy of Finland. Academy of Finland. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/157585961.pdf
Carayol, N., & Thi, T. U. N. (2005). Why do academic scientists engage in interdisciplinary research? Research evaluation, 14(1), 70-79.
Carr, G., Loucks, D. P., & Bloschl, G. (2018). Gaining insight into interdisciplinary research and education programmes: A framework for evaluation. Research Policy, 47(1), 35-48.
Cavanagh, S. (1997). Content analysis: concepts, methods and applications. Nurse researcher, 4(3), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.4.3.5.s2
Choi, B. C., & Pak, A. W. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and investigative medicine, 29(6), 351-364.
Corley, E. A., Boardman, P. C., & Bozeman, B. (2006). Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: Theoretical implications from two case studies. Research Policy, 35(7), 975-993.
Downe‐Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: method, applications, and issues. Health care for women international, 13(3), 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339209516006
Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.
/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Feller, I. (2002). New organizations, old cultures: strategy and implementation of interdisciplinary programs. Research Evaluation, 11(2), 109-116.
Gabriele, G., Medhurst, P., & Green, T. (2005). Disciplinary Boundaries between the Social Sciences and Humanities: Comparative Report on Interdisciplinarity. https://www.york.ac.uk/res/researchintegration/ComparativeReports/Comparative_Report_Interdisciplinarity.pdf
Gill, S. V., Vessali, M., Pratt, J. A., Watts, S., Pratt, J. S., Raghavan, P., & DeSilva, J. M. (2015). The importance of interdisciplinary research training and community dissemination. Clinical and translational science, 8(5), 611-614. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12330
Graybill, J. K., Dooling, S., Shandas, V., Withey, J., Greve, A., & Simon, G. L. (2006). A rough guide to interdisciplinarity: Graduate student perspectives. BioScience, 56(9), 757-763.
Griffin, G., Medhurst, P., & Green, T. (2006). Interdisciplinarity in Interdisciplinary Research Programmes in the UK. University of Hull. https://www.york.ac.uk/res/researchintegration/Interdisciplinarity_UK.pdf
Guerreiro, J. A. (2016, May). Interdisciplinary Research in Social Sciences: A two-way process. Proceedings of the International Congress on Interdisciplinarity in Social and Human Sciences (pp. 209-213)., May 5 – 6, 2016, Research Centre for Spatial and Organizational DynamicsUniversity of AlgarveFaro, Portugal.
Henneman, E. A., Lee, J. L., & Cohen, J. I. (1995). Collaboration: a concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 21(1), 103-109. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.21010103.x
Horlick-Jones, T., & Sime, J. (2004). Living on the border: Knowledge, risk and transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36(4), 441-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.006
Huutoniemi, K., Klein, J. T., Bruun, H., & Hukkinen, J. (2010). Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators. Research Policy, 39(1), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.011
Interdisciplinary Research. (2020). Interdisciplinary Research: Definition, Process and Theory. https://study.com/academy/lesson/interdisciplinary-research-definition-process-and-theory.html
Kapila, S., & Moher, R. (1995). Across Disciplines: Principles for Interdisciplinary Research. International Development Research Center, Ottawa. https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/bitstream/handle/10625/16125/101317.pdf?sequence=1
Kelly, R., Mackay, M., Nash, K. L., Cvitanovic, C., Allison, E. H., Armitage, D., Bonn, A., Cooke, S. J., Frusher, S., Fulton, E. A., Halpern, B. S., Lopes, P. F. M., Milner-Gulland, E. J., Peck, M. A., Pecl, G. T., Stephenson, R. L., & Werner, F. (2019). Ten tips for developing interdisciplinary socio-ecological researchers. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 1(2), 149-161.
Klein, J. T. (2014). Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity: Keyword meanings for collaboration science and translational medicine. Journal of Translational Medicine & Epidemiology, 2(2), 1024.
Klein, J. T. (2008). Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: A literature review. American journal of preventive medicine, 35(2), S116-S123.
Klein, J. T. (2004). Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36(4), 515-526.
Klein, J. T., & Newell, W. H. (1996). Advancing Interdisciplinary Studies. In J. G. Gaff, J. L. Ratcliff, & Associates (Eds.), Handbook of the Undergraduate Curriculum. A Comprehensive Guide to Purposes, Structures, Practices, and Change (pp. 393-415). Jossey- Bass.
Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Wayne State University Press.
Knight, D. B., Lattuca, L. R., Kimball, E. W., & Reason, R. D. (2013). Understanding interdisciplinarity: Curricular and organizational features of undergraduate interdisciplinary programs. Innovative Higher Education, 38(2), 143-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-012-9232-1
Langfeldt, L. (2006). The policy challenges of peer review: Managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessments. Research evaluation, 15(1), 31-41.
Lattuca, L. R. (2001). Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. Vanderbilt University Press.
Lattuca, L. R., Voigt, L. J., & Fath, K. Q. (2004). Does interdisciplinarity promote learning? Theoretical support and researchable questions. The Review of Higher Education, 28(1), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2004.0028
Lele, S., & Norgaard, R. B. (2005). Practicing interdisciplinarity. BioScience, 55(11), 967-975. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0967:PI]2.0.CO;2
Lyall, C., & Meagher, L. R. (2012). A masterclass in interdisciplinarity: Research into practice in training the next generation of interdisciplinary researchers. Futures, 44(6), 608-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.03.011
Lyall, C., Bruce, A., Marsden, W., & Meagher, L. (2011). Key success factors in the quest for interdisciplinary knowledge. ESRC Innogen Centre. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/28965045.pdf
Lyall, C., Tait, J., Meagher, L., Bruce, A., & Marsden, W. (2011). A Short Guide to Evaluating Interdisciplinary Research. http://universidad.edu.uy/resources/1/9/0/1/0_0d69f2c521bb166/19010_c3bef21aec0471d.pdf
Mansilla, V. B., & Duraising, E. D. (2007). Targeted assessment of students' interdisciplinary work: An empirically grounded framework proposed. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(2), 215-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2007.11780874
Mansilla, V. B., Feller, I., & Gardner, H. (2006). Quality assessment in interdisciplinary research and education. Research evaluation, 15(1), 69-74.
Metzger, N., & Zare, R. N. (1999). Interdisciplinary Research: From Belief to Reality. Science, 283(5402), 642-643. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5402.642
Morgan, G. D., Kobus, K., Gerlach, K. K., Neighbors, C., Lerman, C., Abrams, D. B., & Rimer, B. K. (2003). Facilitating transdisciplinary research: the experience of the transdisciplinary tobacco use research centers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 5(Suppl_1), S11-S19.
Nancarrow, S. A., Booth, A., Ariss, S., Smith, T., Enderby, P., & Roots, A. (2013). Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work. Human resources for Health, 11(1), 19.
Nash, J. M. (2008). Transdisciplinary training: key components and prerequisites for success. American journal of preventive medicine, 35(2), S133-S140.
National Academies. (2005). Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. https://www.nap.edu/read/11153/chapter/1
Nicolescu, B. (2005). Towards Transdisciplinary Education and Learning. http://www.metanexus.net/archive/conference2005/pdf/nicolescu.pdf
Nicolescu, B. (2014). Methodology of transdisciplinarity. World Futures, 70(3-4), 186-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2014.934631
Pennington, D. (2016). A conceptual model for knowledge integration in interdisciplinary teams: orchestrating individual learning and group processes. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6(2), 300-312.
Porter, A., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3), 719-745.
Repko, A. F., & Szostak, R. (2020). Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
Rosenfield, P. L. (1992). The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Social Science & Medicine, 35(11), 1343-1357.
Sa, C. M. (2008). Interdisciplinary strategies in US research universities. Higher Education, 55(5), 537-552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9073-5.
Saito, L., Fiedler, F., Cosens, B., & Kauneckis, D. (2012). A vision of interdisciplinary graduate education in water and environmental resources in 2050. In Toward a Sustainable Water Future: Visions for 2050 (pp. 196-206). American Society of Civil Engineers.
Szostak, R. (2007). How and why to teach interdisciplinary research practice. Journal of Research Practice, 3(2), M17-M17.
Tait, J., & Lyall, C. (2007). Short Guide to Developing Interdisciplinary Research Proposals, ISSTI Briefing Note No. 1. www.issti.ed.ac.uk/documents.php?item=18.
Tang, M. (2020). Interdisciplinarity Creativity. Encyclopedia of Creativity (3rd ed., pp. 678-684). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.23823-6
Tekian, A. (2014). Doctoral programs in health professions education. Medical Teacher, 36(1), 73-81.
University of Leicester. (2016). Eleven Principles of Interdisciplinary Research. https://le.ac.uk/research/areas/institutes/institute-advanced-studies/interdisciplinary-christmas/eleven-principles-of-research
Vajaradul, Y. (2016). 12 Years Interdisciplinary Research and Development Project of R.S.T. Paper presented at the 6th International Congress on Interdisciplinary Research and Development for Sustainability, July 5-6, 2016 in Bangkok, Thailand (INRIT2016).
Van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Hessels, L. K. (2011). Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research policy, 40(3), 463-472.
Wickson, F., Carew, A. L., & Russell, A. W. (2006). Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandaries, and quality. Futures, 38(9), 1046-1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.02.011