A Systematic Review of Proactive Work Behavior: Future Research Recommendation
Main Article Content
Abstract
Fifteen years since it was first put forward, proactive work behavior has become the attention of academics within the scope of organizational behavior. The development of proactive work behavior can be observed from the increasing number of studies every year. In response to these developments, five literature reviews were conducted to provide direction for the development of proactive work behavior research. However, only one literature review has mapped out previous research on proactive work behavior. Therefore, this systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to do a broader mapping by including research samples, measurement instruments, antecedents, and consequences of proactive work behavior. A total of 70 research articles published in the Scopus database during 2007-2022 were used for this SLR. The mapping results show the dominance of employees as a research sample which covers more than half of the research articles. Meanwhile, instruments with fewer items tend to be adopted to measure proactive work behavior. The findings related to antecedents and consequences are dominated by individual aspects and do not explore team/group and organizational aspects. In response to these findings, further research needs to be directed to explore proactive work behavior in certain professional and organizational contexts. Furthermore, the measurement instrument for proactive work behavior needs to be further developed by considering organizational characteristics, both private and public sector. Regarding antecedents and consequences, team/group and organizational dynamics need to be explored further by future research so that there is no stagnation in the progress of the development of proactive work behavior studies.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Ashford, S. J., & Black, J. S. (1996). Proactivity during organizational entry: The role of desire for control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.199
Bark, A. S. H., Seliverstova, K., & Ohly, S. (2022). Getting credit for proactivity? The effects of gender. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 52(8), 660–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12833
Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140202
Belschak, F. D., & Den Hartog, D. N. D. (2010). Pro-self, prosocial, and pro-organizational foci of proactive behaviour: Differential antecedents and consequences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 475–498. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X439208
Bindl, U. K., & Parker, S. K. (2010). Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations. APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol 2: Selecting and Developing Members for the Organization, 567–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/12170-019
Caniëls, M. C. J., & Baaten, S. M. J. (2019). How a Learning-Oriented Organizational Climate is Linked to Different Proactive Behaviors: The Role of Employee Resilience. Social Indicators Research, 143(2), 561–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1996-y
Coffelt, T. A. (2017). Confidentiality and Anonymity of Participants. In M. Allen (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. SAGE.. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483381411
Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2018). Organizational Behavior: Improving Performance And Commitment in the Workplace (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Paterson, N. L., Stadler, M. J., & Saks, A. M. (2014). The relative importance of proactive behaviors and outcomes for predicting newcomer learning, well-being, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(3), 318–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.02.007
Cui, Z., & Li, Y. (2021). The Relationship Between Proactive Behavior and Work-Family Conflict: A Moderated Mediation Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657863
do Nascimento, T. T., Porto, J. B., & Kwantes, C. T. (2018). Transformational leadership and follower proactivity in a volunteer workforce. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 28(4), 565–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21308
Elsevier. (2022). Scopus - Document search results of Proactive Work Behavior | Signed in. Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/results/results.uri?sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=proactive+work+behavior&sid=a36e9b104aed21897d0078ef1b93e66a&sot=b&sdt=b&sl=38&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY%28proactive+work+behavior%29&origin=searchbasic&editSaveSearch=&yearFrom=Before+1960&yearTo=Present
Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23005-6
Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K., & Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70(2), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00639.x
Fu, H., Ye, B. H., & Xu, X. (2020). The cross-level effect of shared leadership on tourism employee proactive behavior and adaptive performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(15), 6173. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156173
Gawke, J. C., Gorgievski, M. J., & Bakker, A. B. (2017). Employee intrapreneurship and work engagement: A latent change score approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.03.002
Gawke, J. C., Gorgievski, M. J., & Bakker, A. B. (2018). Personal costs and benefits of employee intrapreneurship: Disentangling the employee intrapreneurship, well-being, and job performance relationship. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(4), 508–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000105
Ghitulescu, B. E. (2018). Psychosocial effects of proactivity: The interplay between proactive and collaborative behavior. Personnel Review, 47(2), 294–318. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-08-2016-0209
Granger, S., Neville, L., & Turner, N. (2020). Political knowledge at work: Conceptualization, measurement, and applications to follower proactivity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(2), 431–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12293
Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634438
Hou, X., & Huang, R. (2021). The Literature Review of Proactive Behavior at Work. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Modern Education and Humanities Science (ICMEHS 2021), 129–132.
Ismail, A., Mohd Nowalid, W. A. W., & Bakar, R. A. (2016). Proactive behaviour as a mediator of the relationship between career management and career satisfaction. Jurnal Pengurusan, 48, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2016-48-08
Junker, T. L., Bakker, A. B., Gorgievski, M. J., & Derks, D. (2022). Agile work practices and employee proactivity: A multilevel study. Human Relations, 75(12), 2189–2217. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267211030101
Lebel, R. D., & Patil, S. V. (2018). Proactivity despite discouraging supervisors: The powerful role of prosocial motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(7), 724–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000301
Li, R., & Tian, X. (2014). Supervisor Authoritarian Leadership and Subordinate Proactive Behavior: Test of A Mediated-Moderation Model. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(11), 1719. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041.2014.01719
Li, X. (2020). The Preliminary Literature Review of Proactive Behavior. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 10(5), 915–919. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2020.105061
Liu, Y., Fuller, B., Hester, K., Bennett, R. J., & Dickerson, M. S. (2018). Linking authentic leadership to subordinate behaviors. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 39(2), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-12-2016-0327
Lu, D. (2022, August 11). China overtakes the US in scientific research output. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/aug/11/china-overtakes-the-us-in-scientific-research-output
Luthans, F., Luthans, B. C., & Luthans, K. W. (2021). Organizational Behavior: An Evidence-Based Approach (14th ed.). Information Age Publishing.
Lyons, S. T., Duxbury, L. E., & Higgins, C. A. (2006). A comparison of the values and commitment of private sector, public sector, and parapublic sector employees. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 605–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00620.x
Manjunathan, S., & Vasantha, S. (2017). Mediation effects: Proactive behavior on work engagement and turnover intention with reference to it sector, Chennai, Tamil Nadu. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(4), 261–272. https://serialsjournals.com/abstract/69469_ch_21_f_-_sandhya_manjunath.pdf
Mannion, A. F., Elfering, A., Fekete, T. F., Harding, I. J., Monticone, M., Obid, P., Niemeyer, T., Liljenqvist, U., Boss, A., Zimmermann, L., Vila-Casademunt, A., Sánchez Pérez-Grueso, F. J., Pizones, J., Pellisé, F., Richner-Wunderlin, S., Kleinstück, F. S., Obeid, I., Boissiere, L., Alanay, A., & Bagó, J. (2022). Shorter and sweeter: The 16-item version of the SRS questionnaire shows better structural validity than the 20-item version in young patients with spinal deformity. Spine Deformity, 10(5), 1055–1062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-022-00509-5
Matsuo, M. (2020). The role of work authenticity in linking strengths use to career satisfaction and proactive behavior: A two-wave study. Career Development International, 25(6), 617–630. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-01-2020-0015
Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403–419. https://doi.org/10.2307/257011
Narmaditya, B. S., & Sahid, S. (2023). Financial Literacy in Family and the Economic Behavior of University Students: A Systematic Literature Review. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 18(1), 114–128.
National Research Ethics Committees. (2022, May 26). Guidelines for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities. National Research Ethics Committees. https://www.forskningsetikk.no/en/guidelines/social-sciences-humanities-law-and-theology/guidelines-for-research-ethics-in-the-social-sciences-humanities-law-and-theology/
Nurjaman, K., Marta, M. S., Eliyana, A., Kurniasari, D., & Kurniasari, D. (2019). Proactive work behavior and innovative work behavior: Moderating effect of job characteristics. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(6), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7663
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554
Parker, S. K., Wang, Y., & Liao, J. (2019). When Is Proactivity Wise? A Review of Factors That Influence the Individual Outcomes of Proactive Behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6(1), 221–248. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015302
Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
Pham, T. N. M. (2021). The Relationship Between Human Resource Management Practices, Work Engagement and Employee Behavior: A Case Study in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 1003–1012. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no4.1003
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2010). Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(11), 1451–1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004
Rolstad, S., Adler, J., & Rydén, A. (2011). Response burden and questionnaire length: Is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis. Value in Health, 14(8), 1101–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.003
Rousseau, V., & Aubé, C. (2018). When Leaders Stifle Innovation in Work Teams: The Role of Abusive Supervision. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(3), 651–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3258-8
Saks, A. M., Gruman, J. A., & Cooper-Thomas, H. (2011). The neglected role of proactive behavior and outcomes in newcomer socialization. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.12.007
Smithikrai, C. (2019). Antecedents and Consequences of Work Engagement Among Thai Employees. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 14(3), 14–31.
https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IJBS/article/view/189001
Smithikrai, C. (2022). Antecedents and Consequences of Proactive Work Behavior Among Thai Employees. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 17(1), 43–57.
https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IJBS/article/view/254132
Smithikrai, C., & Suwannadet, J. (2018). Authentic leadership and proactive work behavior: Moderated mediation effects of conscientiousness and organizational commitment. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 13(2), 94–106. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IJBS/article/view/136333
Spychala, A., & Sonnentag, S. (2011). The dark and the bright sides of proactive work behaviour and situational constraints: Longitudinal relationships with task conflicts. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(5), 654–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.487646
Subar, A. F., Ziegler, R. G., Thompson, F. E., Johnson, C. C., Weissfeld, J. L., Reding, D., Kavounis, K. H., & Hayes, R. B. (2001). Is shorter always better? Relative importance of questionnaire length and cognitive ease on response rates and data quality for two dietary questionnaires. American Journal of Epidemiology, 153(4), 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/153.4.404
Syamsudin, N., Eliyana, A., Nurdin, N., Sudrajat, A., Giyanto, B., Emur, A. P., & Zahar, M. (2022). Are job satisfaction and role breadth self-efficacy the links to proactive work behavior? Heliyon, 8(1), e08710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08710
Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/256902
Varela, J. A., Bande, B., Del Rio, M., & Jaramillo, F. (2019). Servant Leadership, Proactive Work Behavior, and Performance Overall Rating: Testing a Multilevel Model of Moderated Mediation. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 26(2), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712X.2019.1603417
Walford, G. (2005). Research ethical guidelines and anonymity. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 28(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/01406720500036786
Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. (1998). The Role-Based Performance Scale: Validity Analysis of A Theory-Based Measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 540–555. https://doi.org/10.5465/256941
Worawattanaparinya, S. (2020). Mediation Role of Intrinsic Motivation in Transmitting the Effect of Self-Efficacy to Proactive Work Behavior of Generation Y Operation Staffs in the Automotive Industry in Rayong Province, Thailand. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 1–11.
Wu, C. H., Deng, H., & Li, Y. (2018). Enhancing a Sense of Competence at Work by Engaging in Proactive Behavior: The Role of Proactive Personality. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(3), 801–816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9827-9
Wu, C. H., & Parker, S. K. (2013). Thinking and Acting in Anticipation: A Review of Research on Proactive Behavior. Advances in Psychological Science, 21(4), 679–700. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1042.2013.00679
Wu, C. H., & Parker, S. K. (2017). The Role of Leader Support in Facilitating Proactive Work Behavior: A Perspective From Attachment Theory. Journal of Management, 43(4), 1025–1049. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314544745
Yu, C. (2023). Private sector set to drive economic growth. Chinadaily.Com.Cn. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202303/09/WS64091a4ba31057c47ebb32c3.html
Zhang, H. (2020). A Review and Prospects of Literature on Proactivity. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 08(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2020.82017
Zhang, M. J., Law, K. S., & Wang, L. (2020). The risks and benefits of initiating change at work: Social consequences for proactive employees who take charge. Personnel Psychology, 74(4), 721-750. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12423