Using Automatic Platform to Track Individual Study Scores for Fully Online Education

Authors

  • Oraya Sooknit Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya
  • Surasit Sakda Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya
  • Walairach Noonsong Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya

Keywords:

LineBot, Chatbot, Learning Management, automatic platform

Abstract

This research using Automatic Platform to track individual study scores for fully online education. The use of LineBot technology serves as a communication channel between students and teachers through an automated response system that utilizes learning outcomes and feedback recorded by the teacher in a Google Sheet. This data is linked and connected through various scenarios using make automatic platform. Furthermore, assessment on innovation in 2 user groups such as 1) student at highest level  2) teacher the result at highest level . That seem to be that, the assessment result was in the same. This statistic used for analyze the data included mean and standard deviation.

References

A. Ban, N. Che'Pa, J. Din, and N. A. M. Yaa'cob, "Integrating social collaborative features in Learning Management System: A case study," in 2017 IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services (IC3e), 2560: IEEE, pp. 67-72.

K. Abe, "Data mining and machine learning applications for educational big data in the university," in 2019 IEEE Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Intl Conf on Cloud and Big Data Computing, Intl Conf on Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech), 2562: IEEE, pp. 350-355.

W.P.Review. "Line Users by Country 2024." https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/line-users-by-country (accessed August, 31, 2567).

A. Rahmati, E. Fernandes, J. Jung, and A. Prakash, "IFTTT vs. Zapier: A comparative study of trigger-action programming frameworks," arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.02788, 2560.

Y.-H. Chen, N.-F. Huang, J.-W. Tzeng, C.-a. Lee, Y.-X. Huang, and H.-H. Huang, "A personalized learning path recommender system with LINE bot in MOOCs Based on LSTM," in 2022 11th International Conference on Educational and Information Technology (ICEIT), 2565: IEEE, pp. 40-45.

ณภัทร ไชยพราหมณ์, ณัฐวุฒิ ทุมนัต, และ ชูพันธุ์ รัตนโภคา, "ระบบตอบกลับและแจ้งข้อมูลทางการศึกษาผ่านไลน์บอท," Journal of Information Science & Technology, vol. 10, no. 2, 2563.

V. Sittakul, S. Judprasong, and N. Saengmanee, "Smart Quiz System for Classroom via LINEBot," in 2019 Research, Invention, and Innovation Congress (RI2C), 2019: IEEE, pp. 1-4.

A. Sreelakshmi, S. Abhinaya, A. Nair, and S. J. Nirmala, "A question answering and quiz generation chatbot for education," in 2019 Grace Hopper Celebration India (GHCI), 2019: IEEE, pp. 1-6.

พิศิษฐ ตัณฑวณิช และ พนา จินดาศรี, "ความหมายที่แท้จริงของค่า IOC," Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 3-12, 2561.

"Math is Fun." https://www.mathsisfun.com/data/standard-deviation.html (accessed November,15, 2567).

Make.com. "Make – Platform for workflow automation." https://www.make.com/ (accessed August, 31, 2567).

M. Biehl, Webhooks–Events for RESTful APIs., API-University Press, 2017.

M. Khalil, B. Taraghi, and M. Ebner, "Engaging Learning Analytics in MOOCs: the good, the bad, and the ugly," arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.03776, 2016.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): July – December

Section

Research article

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Learning Innovation and Technology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Publishing Ethics

  • The editorial team reserves the right to consider articles that meet the full format and specifications only. If the article does not meet the editorial requirements, the editors have the right to refuse to publish.
  • To request a letter of acceptance for publication, the editorial office is issued only if the article is ready to be published unconditionally.
  • The peer review of the Journal of Learning Innovation and Technology is final. The article may not be published in the specified volumes until the article has been reviewed and is ready to be published.
  • Research related to the ethics of human and animal research must be reviewed by the Institutional Review Board (IRB)
  • The submitted articles must not have been published in any other publication before and must not be under consideration by other journals. Published articles are copyright of the JLIT.