Corporate Governance and Sustainable Growth of Thailand’s Direct Selling Industry: A Case Study of Aiyara Planet Company Limited

Authors

  • Kampanart Bunrasri Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Rambhai Barni Rajabhat University
  • Chaiyon Praditsil Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Rambhai Barni Rajabhat University
  • Porntiwa Archeewa Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Rambhai Barni Rajabhat University

Keywords:

Corporate Governance, Sustainability, Thailand's Direct Selling Business

Abstract

This research article aimed to 1) examine the relationship between corporate governance and the sustainability of Thai direct selling businesses, using Aiyara Planet Company Limited as a case study, and 2) propose strategies for promoting corporate governance to support the sustainability of Thai direct selling businesses. The study employed a qualitative research approach based on transdisciplinary research. The 16 key informants were divided into four groups: experts and individuals involved in regulatory mechanisms, media representatives and academics, senior independent distributors, and mid-level independent distributors. They were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, oral history interviews, focus group discussions, and documentary research, including the company's financial statements. Data were analyzed using social interpretation. The findings revealed that 1) corporate governance was linked to the sustainability of direct selling businesses through two key mechanisms: a trust cycle arising from four dimensions of corporate governance, namely transparency, accountability, fairness, and participation, which fostered stakeholder trust; and the organization's ability to adapt and respond to crises. The company's financial performance showed a recovery from a net loss of THB 4.5 million in 2019 to a net profit of THB 55.9 million in 2024. When considered alongside qualitative data, this reflected the links among corporate governance, stakeholder trust, and business continuity; and 2) strategies for promoting corporate governance should be implemented in an integrated manner at three levels: organizational, industry, and policy, covering all four interconnected and mutually reinforcing dimensions of corporate governance to support the long-term sustainability of Thai direct selling businesses.

References

ชัยยนต์ ประดิษฐศิลป์. (2559). ปฏิบัติการวิจัยทางสังคม. คณะมนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏรำไพพรรณี.

นิกร ดุกสุกแก้ว, ชูวงศ์ อุบาลี และ ชัยยนต์ ประดิษฐศิลป์ (2566). ยุทธศาสตร์การขับเคลื่อนธุรกิจขายตรงไทยอย่างยั่งยืนในกัมพูชา: กรณีศึกษาบริษัท ไอยราแพลนเน็ต จำกัด. วารสารวิจัยรำไพพรรณี. 17(1), 49-58

สมาคมการขายตรงไทย. (2563). ปัญหาและแนวโน้มของธุรกิจขายตรงในประเทศไทย: วิเคราะห์ผลกระทบของการกำกับดูแลและมาตรฐานบรรษัทภิบาล. สมาคมการขายตรงไทย.

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการคุ้มครองผู้บริโภค. (2564). รายงานการกำกับดูแลและปัญหาทางกฎหมายของธุรกิจขายตรงในประเทศไทย. สำนักงานคณะกรรมการคุ้มครองผู้บริโภค.

Bansal, P., & DesJardine, M. R. (2014). Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization. 12(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013520265

Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. (1992). Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. Gee.

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review. 20(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9503271992

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review. 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics. 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Klein, J. T. (2010). A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & C. Mitcham (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 15–30). Oxford University Press.

Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power: Two works. John Wiley & Sons.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review. 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335

OECD. (2015). G20/OECD principles of corporate governance. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264236882-en

Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review. 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331

Vander Nat, P. J., & Keep, W. W. (2002). Marketing fraud: An approach for differentiating multilevel marketing from pyramid schemes. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(1), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.21.1.139.17603

Downloads

Published

2026-10-24

How to Cite

bunrasri, kampanart, Praditsil, C., & Archeewa, P. . (2026). Corporate Governance and Sustainable Growth of Thailand’s Direct Selling Industry: A Case Study of Aiyara Planet Company Limited. Journal of MCU Social Development , 11(3), 118–129. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JMSD/article/view/296438