AN INTEGRATED LEARNING MANAGEMENT APPROACH THROUGH COMMUNITY-BASED PRACTICAL ACTIVITIES FOR ENHANCING LEARNING OUTCOMES IN MARKETING EDUCATION

Main Article Content

Kannipat Suwan-on
Patumwan Thongtrachou
Maneerat Rattanaphan
Chutima Thutsaro

Abstract

This academic article aims to present an integrated learning management approach through community-based practical activities for enhancing learning outcomes in marketing education. The article synthesizes relevant concepts and theories, including community-based integration, experiential learning, active learning, and outcome-based education within the context of marketing education. It explains the design of learning activities that connect marketing knowledge, particularly the 4P marketing mix including product, price, place, and promotion with community participation in order to develop learners’ knowledge, skills, and competencies. The synthesis findings indicate that effective learning management should consist of four key components: integration, practice-based learning, reflective learning, and holistic assessment. These components promote critical thinking, problem-solving, communication, collaboration, self-directed learning, and the application of knowledge in real-world situations. At the same time, they foster morality, ethics, public consciousness, and social responsibility. Furthermore, they enable learners to connect marketing knowledge with community contexts and stakeholders appropriately. Based on the synthesis, the author proposes the “Integrated Learning Management Model through Marketing Practical Activities” to bridge theoretical learning and practical implementation. The model aims to develop learners to embody “critical thinking, moral integrity, and achievement” while achieving the curriculum learning outcomes in marketing, including morality and ethics, strategic analysis and planning, digital technology utilization, stakeholder collaboration, and communication. Ultimately, the model contributes to marketing learning outcomes, work readiness, and the development of 21st century skills.

Article Details

How to Cite
Suwan-on, K., Thongtrachou, P., Rattanaphan, M., & Thutsaro, C. (2026). AN INTEGRATED LEARNING MANAGEMENT APPROACH THROUGH COMMUNITY-BASED PRACTICAL ACTIVITIES FOR ENHANCING LEARNING OUTCOMES IN MARKETING EDUCATION. Journal of Social Science and Cultural, 10(9), 49–62. retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JSC/article/view/296268
Section
Academic Article

References

มหาวิทยาลัยหาดใหญ่. (2569). ปรัชญา วิสัยทัศน์ และพันธกิจ. เรียกใช้เมื่อ 18 พฤษภาคม 2569 จาก https://www.hu.ac.th/philosopsy.html

สำนักงานสภาพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ. (2566). แผนพัฒนาเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ ฉบับที่ 13 พ.ศ. 2566-2570. เรียกใช้เมื่อ 18 พฤษภาคม 2569 จาก https://www.nesdc.go.th/the-national-economic-and-social-development-plan/the-thirteenth-plan-2023-2027/

Bonwell, C. C. & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC higher education reports. Retrieved May 10, 2026, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED336049

Drake, S. M. & Burns, R. C. (2004). Meeting standards through integrated curriculum. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Freeman, S. et al. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111.

Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational researcher, 32(4), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032004003.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235-266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3.

Johnson, D. W. et al. . (1998). Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom. (2nd ed.). Edina: Interaction Book Company.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Macayan, J. V. (2017). Implementing outcome-based education (OBE) framework: Implications for assessment of students’ performance. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Review, 8(1), 1-10.

Noor, M. M. et al. (2009). Education reform model at faculty of mechanical engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang. International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, 1(5), 166-171.

Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. New York: Grossman Publishers.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x.

Silberman, M. (1996). Active Learning: 101 Strategies To Teach Any Subject. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Sobel, D. (2004). Place-based education: Connecting classrooms and communities. Education for meaning and social justice, 17(3), 63-64.

Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-based education: Critical issues and answers. American Association of School Administrators. Retrieved May 5, 2026, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED380910

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning. San Rafael: Autodesk Foundation.