Efficiency of Speed Reading and English Reading Comprehension of Undergraduate Students in Thailand

Main Article Content

Bundit ANUYAHONG

Abstract

The purposes of this research were 1) to study speed reading efficiency of undergraduate students in Thailand, 2) to compare reading ability of undergraduate students before and after the class, 3) to compare reading ability of experi­mental group and control group according before and after the class, and 4) to study satisfaction with the method of speed reading of the undergraduate students


Research samples were 35 undergraduate students in higher education level derived through simple random sam­pling technique. The instruments used for gathering the data were speed reading materials, a reading test, and a satisfaction questionnaire. Statistics used for analyzing the data were frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, t-test, and content analysis.


Research findings were as follows:


  1. The reading efficiency of undergraduate students was at a moderate level.

  2. The scores of reading ability of undergraduate students after the class were higher that before the class with statisti­cally significance at 0.05 level.

  3. The scores of reading ability of experimental group students were higher than control group students with statis­tically significance at 0.05 level.

  4. The students’ satisfaction towards the speed reading technique was highly positive. 


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Research Article

References

R. P. Carver, “Reading rate: Theory, research, and practical Implications,” Journal of Reading, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 84-95, 1992.

W. Duanglit, “Effects of Using Constructed Instruction Based on Interesting to Students’ English Reading Skill Development,” M.S. Thesis, Dept. English, Graduate School of Mahasarakarm University, 2001.

D. Brown, Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall Regents, 1994.

B. Khajonsil, Educational Research Methodology, 5th ed. Bangkok: P.N. Publishing, 2000.

J. W. Best, Research in Education, 5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc., 1981.

L. J. Cronbach, The Dependability of Behavioral Measurement Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profile. New York: Wiley Press, 1974.

P. Thaweerat, Methodology of Behavioral and Social Sciences, 8th ed. Bangkok: Chareonphol Publishing, 2000.

E. Quinn, S. P. Nation, and S. Millett, Asian and Pacific speed readings for ESL learners: twenty passages written at the one thousand word level. Wellington: School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, Victoria University of Wellington, 2007.

K. Goodman, Reading, Writing, and Written Texts: A Transactional Sociolinguistic View. In R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (eds.) Theoretical models and processes of reading. Newark: International Reading Association, 1994.

E. Williams, Reading in the Language Classroom, 8th ed. London: MacMillan, 1994.

C. D. Mary and H. Mark, “The effect of reading speed and reading pattern on the understanding of text read from screen,” Journal Research Reading, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 210-223, 2000.

T. Rasinski, A. Rikli, and S. Johnston, “Reading fluency more than automaticity? More than a concern for the primary grades?,” Literacy Research and Instruction, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 350-361, 2009.

R. P. Carver, “Reading Rate: Theory, Research, and Practical Implications,” Journal of Reading, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 84-95, 1992.