Measuring Supply Chain Efficiency in Elderly Care Businesses: A Second-Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Main Article Content

Bantita Sukcharoen
Sorapol Buranakul

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the goodness of fit of the measurement model's efficiency in the supply chain of elderly care businesses, using empirical data. This research is quantitative. The sample group used in the study was 400 elderly care business entrepreneurs selected by stratified random sampling. The research instrument was a questionnaire with a 5-point rating scale. The data were analyzed using second-order confirmatory factor analysis. The research results found that the efficiency of the supply chain of elderly care businesses consisted of 4 components: supply linkage flexibility, logistics cost, product/service quality, and delivery time. The measurement model was consistent with the empirical data: CMIN/df = 1.932, CFI = 0.983, GFI = 0.937, AGFI = 0.906, RMR =0.019, and RMSEA = 0.048. The research results of the measurement model of the efficiency of the supply chain of the elderly care business can use each factor to plan the organization's risk management to create resilience in providing services to the staff on time to meet the needs of the elderly and manage costs for the procurement of medicines and medical supplies sufficient for the elderly in both regular and unexpected events or crises.

Article Details

Section
Research Article

References

Altiok, T., & Ranjan, R. (1995). Multi-stage, pull-type production/inventory systems. IIE Transactions, 27(2), 190–200.

Apinya Ingard. (2022). Principles Theories and Practices: Structural Equation Modeling (in Thai). Bangkok, Thailand: CU Press.

Burches, E., & Burches, M. (2020). Efficacy, effectiveness, and efficiency in the health care: The need for an agreement to clarify its meaning. International Archives of Public Health and Community Medicine, 4(1), 1–3.

Cohen, M. A., & Lee, H. L. (1989). Resource deployment analysis of global manufacturing and distribution networks. Journal of Manufacturing and Operations Management, 2, 81–104.

Department of Older Persons. (2024) Statistics on Older Person. Retrieved from https://www.dop.go.th/en/topic/view=361

Duangnet Koomtong, Saiphin Panthong, & Narupon Sengsuebphol. (2021). Factors within the organization that influence employees performance in the warehouse at Lat Krabang Industrial Estate (in Thai). Journal of Innovation and Management, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, 6(2), 78–91.

Ishii, K., Takahashi, K., & Muramatsu, R. (1988). Integrated production, inventory and distribution systems. The International Journal of Production Research, 26(3), 473–482.

Khalili-Damghani, K., Tavana, M., & Najmodin, M. (2015). Reverse logistics and supply chains: A structural equation modeling investigation. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 22(3), 354–368.

Kottala, S. Y., & Herbert, K. (2020). An empirical investigation of supply chain operations reference model practices and supply chain performance: Evidence from manufacturing sector. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(9), 1925–1954.

Lee, H. L., & Billington, C. (1992). Managing supply chain inventory: Pitfalls and opportunities. Sloan Management Review, 33(3), 65–73.

Mohaghar, A., & Ghasemi, R. (2011). A concept model for supply chain relations quality and supply chain performance by structural equation modeling: A case study in the Iranian automotive industry. European Journal of Social Science, 21(3), 456–470.

Newhart, D. D., Stott, K. L., Jr., & Vasko, F. J. (1993). Consolidating product sizes to minimize inventory levels for a multi-stage production and distribution system. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44(7), 637–644.

Nichtima Rayakaew, & Wanno Fongsuwan. (2013). Structural equation model of market orientation, logistics, supply chain management and effectiveness in the Government Pharmaceutical Organization (GPO) (in Thai). Journal of the Association of Researchers, 18(1), 38–47.

Palmer, S., & Torgerson, D. J. (1999). Definitions of efficiency. BMJ, 318, 1136. doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7191.1136

Ross, D. F. (1998). Competing Through Supply Chain Management: Creating Market-winning Strategies Through Supply Chain Partnerships. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Seo, Y.-J., Dinwoodie, J., & Kwak, D.-W. (2014). The impact of innovativeness on supply chain performance: Is supply chain integration a missing link?. Supply Chain Management, 19(5/6), 733–746.

Sharma, V., Raut, R. D., Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M., Narkhede, B. E., Gokhale, R., & Priyadarshinee, P. (2022). Mediating effect of industry 4.0 technologies on the supply chain management practices and supply chain performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 322, 115945. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115945

Tayur, S., Ganeshan, R., & Magazine, M. (2012). Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.

Whitten, G. D., Green, K. W., Jr., & Zelbst, P. J. (2012). Triple-A supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(1), 28–48.

Ye, F., & Wang, Z. (2013). Effects of information technology alignment and information sharing on supply chain operational performance. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 65(3), 370–377.