Enhancing Teaching Competency of Young Teachers through a Cognitive Apprenticeship Workshop Model
Keywords:
Teaching Competency, Cognitive Apprenticeship Workshop Model, Young TeachersAbstract
This study addresses critical deficiencies in current teacher education programs, particularly the inadequate training in art criticism theory that impedes the professional development of early-career educators in design disciplines. To bridge this gap, we developed and evaluated a novel "workshop-cognitive apprenticeship" hybrid model that synergizes expert mentorship, authentic pedagogical tasks, and collaborative learning mechanisms. The research employed a quasi-experimental design involving six young teachers and 140 students from an art design department, randomly assigned to either the experimental (workshop model) or control (traditional training) condition. Over a 10-week intervention, the workshop model implemented three scaffolded phases: (1) modeling-observation through multimedia demonstrations, (2) construction-practice with real classroom implementation, and (3) guidance-generalization via reflective discourse.
The research results found that:
Quantitative analysis revealed statistically superior outcomes for the experimental group across multiple metrics: lesson plan standardization (p < .01), theoretical application depth (p < .05), and classroom interaction quality (p < .01). Corresponding student cohorts demonstrated significantly greater improvement in art criticism competencies (post-test M = 4.01 vs. 2.53, p < .001). Qualitative data identified three success mediators: the "demonstration-scaffolding-reflection" cognitive loop, situated learning in authentic contexts, and anxiety reduction through expert collaboration.These findings substantiate the model's efficacy in transforming teacher preparation paradigms. The study contributes both theoretically - by expanding cognitive apprenticeship applications in higher education, and practically - through a replicable training framework. We recommend institutional adoption of this approach with longitudinal evaluation to assess skill retention. Future research should examine scalability across disciplines and the synergistic effects of technological integration in apprenticeship models.
References
Barnett, M., Keating, T., Harwood, W., & Saam, J. (2002). Using emerging technologies to help bridge the gap between university theory and classroom practice: Challenges and successes. School Science and Mathematics, 102(6), 299-313.
Collins, A., Brown,J .S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and Mathematics. In Resnick, L. B. (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser, Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum, 453-494.
Farmer, J. A., Jr., Buckmaster, A., & LeGrand, B. (1992). Cognitive apprenticeship: Implications for continuing professional education. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 55, 41-49.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
LeGrand, B., Farmer, J. A., Jr., & Buckmaster, A. (1993). Cognitive apprenticeship approach to help adults learn. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 59, 69-78.
Olson, S., & dan Loucks-Horsley, S. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington DC: National Academic Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17226/9596
Ostovar-Namaghi, S. A., Moghaddam, M. M., & Veysmorady, K. (2024). Empowering English learners through cognitive apprenticeship training: A pathway to success in IELTS speaking proficiency. Language Teaching Research. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241227896
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 17, 89-100.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Academic MCU Buriram Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ทัศนะและความคิดเห็นที่ปรากฏในบทความวารสารฉบับนี้ถือเป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนบทความนั้น ไม่ถือเป็นทัศนะและความรับผิดชอบของบรรณาธิการ