Using Semantic Field Approach in Teaching Vocabulary Comprehension of Prathomsuksa 3 Students at Thairathwitthaya 86 (Banphasakluang) School, Chiang Rai Province, Thailand
Keywords:
Semantic Field Approach, Vocabulary, Comprehension, Vocabulary RetentionAbstract
The research aimed to (1) analyse semantic relations that occur in English Commercial Textbook, “Say hello 3”, (2) investigate students vocabulary achievement after using semantic field approach, and (3) examine students’ satisfaction towards the use of semantic field approach. Employing a mixed-methods approach with an exploratory sequential design, the study investigated the effectiveness of the semantic field approach in teaching English vocabulary to 17 Prathomsuksa 3 students at Thairathwitthaya 86 (Banphasakluang) School. The qualitative phase involved content analysis to identify and categorize vocabulary based on semantic relations, which led to the development of 12 lesson plans that incorporated semantic mapping. The quantitative phase used a One-Group Pretest-Posttest Design, with vocabulary proficiency measured by pre-tests, post-tests, and a retention test administered 28 days later. A questionnaire was used to evaluate student satisfaction. The statistics used to analyze the collected data were the mean, standard deviation, and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test.
The research results found that:
- A content analysis of the English textbook “Say hello 3” showed that the majority of semantic relations were based on hyponymy and part-whole relations.
- There was a statistically significant improvement in students’ vocabulary achievement from the pre-test (Mean = 15.53) to the post-test (Mean = 32.18). Although retention scores (Mean = 29.06) showed a statistically significant decrease from post-test scores, they remained substantially higher than pre-test levels, which indicates durable learning.
- Students' satisfaction with the semantic field approach was at a high level (Mean = 2.76).
References
Aitchison, J. (2003). Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Boonnak, C. (2018). English proficiency of Thai students: A study on O-NET and GAT scores. Journal of Language Education, 36(2), 234–241.
Borza, P., & Gorjian, B. (2015). The effect of semantic relation strategies on Iranian high school learners’ vocabulary recall and retention. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 8(3), 104–117.
British Council. (2023). Challenges in English Language Education in Thailand. Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.or.th
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
Guo, L. (2010). Application of semantic field theory in English vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Research, 45(2), 234–245.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2009). Educational guidelines for English teachers. Academic Affairs Division.
National Institute of Educational Testing Service (Public Organization). (2023). Report of Ordinary National Educational Test (O-NET) for Prathom 6 Academic Year 2023. Retrieved from https://www.niets.or.th/th/content/ view/25710
Phuriudomseth, A. (2010). Vocabulary retention among Thai students: The semantic field approach. The Language Teacher, 34(1), 23–35.
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Sathientharadol, K. (2020). The role of English in Thai education. Journal of Language Policy, 18(1), 22–35.
Trier, J. (1931). Der Deutsche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes: Die Geschichte eines sprachlichen Feldes. Winter.
Wallace, M. L. (1984). Teaching vocabulary. Heinemann Educational Books.
Wimonrat, S. (2011). Vocabulary learning strategies for English language learners. Language Education and Development, 8(4), 3–12.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Academic MCU Buriram Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ทัศนะและความคิดเห็นที่ปรากฏในบทความวารสารฉบับนี้ถือเป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนบทความนั้น ไม่ถือเป็นทัศนะและความรับผิดชอบของบรรณาธิการ