Transnational Public Administration in the Digital Era
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aimed to study transnational public administration influencing the administration of public affairs in Thailand by analyzing the content of the information obtained from the document. It was found that the public administration did not only operate on the land of Thailand. It also had contacts with various countries in trade, investment, technology and cooperation at both bilateral and multilateral levels including taking care of the interests of Thailand abroad. And digital technology has created opportunities for decentralization in government affairs to become more realistic. The adoption of influence of liberal capitalism, market mechanisms, global governance, science, technology, concepts and management theories through comparative study of successful countries in national administration is another approach that Thailand has applied concepts, theories, science and technology that will enable efficient public affairs management in accordance with the changing environment. In doing so, the government, public administration, government employee, national administration policy advisor should adjust paradigm and perform as follows: 1) there should be adjustments to the bureaucratic system to be independent in administration and practice; 2) the principles of global governance should be based on the development of public affairs management to be true in both concepts and practices; 3) in terms of academics, the curriculum for teaching public administration in educational institutions and in government agencies should integrate the resources and personnel to teach and train those preparing to enter the civil service system. On the other hand, the curriculum scope should be added to study public administration in comparison with the public administration of countries that have been successful in developing countries to prepare people who will be government employees to be aware of changes and have the potential to manage public resources and look after the interests of Thailand.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. เนื้อหาและข้อมูลในบทความที่ลงพิมพ์กับวารสารวิจยวิชาการ ถือเป็นข้อคิดเห็น และความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนบทความโดยตรงซึ่งกองบรรณาธิการวารสารไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วย หรือร่วมรับผิดชอบใด ๆ
2. บทความ ข้อมูล เนื้อหา รูปภาพ ฯลฯ ที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ในวารสารวิจยวิชาการ ถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารวิจยวิชาการ หากบุคคลหรือหน่วยงานใดต้องการนำทั้งหมดหรือส่วนหนึ่ง ส่วนใดไปเผยแพร่ต่อหรือเพื่อการกระทำการใด ๆ จะต้องได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษรจากวารสารวิจยวิชาการก่อนเท่านั้น
References
เทียนไชย จงพีร์เพียร. (2564). ประวัตินโยบายการแปรรูปรัฐวิสาหกิจและการเปิดเสรีด้านพลังงาน. เข้าถึงได้จาก http://www.eppo.go.th/images/about/historyEppo-4.pdf
จิตตรา ศรีสงกราน. (2564). WHO คืออะไร?. เข้าถึงได้จาก https://www. safesiri. com/who/
วิน อุดมรัชตวนิชย์. (2564). อัตราการขยายตัวทางเศรษฐกิจไทยมาจากไหน?. เข้าถึงได้จาก https://forbesthailand. com/commentaries/insights/อัตราการขยายตัวทางเศรษ.html
Bauer, M.W. and Ege, J. (2012). Policization within the European Commission’s bureaucracy. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(3), 425-446.
Biermannn, F. and Bernd, S. (2009). Managers of Global Change: The Influence of International Environmental. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Camporesi, A. (1989). Strategia sì, ma non troppo. Guidare l'azienda tra metodo e intuito. Italy: Franco Angeli.
Caughey, D. et al. (2009). Defining, measuring, and modeling bureaucratic autonomy. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Defining%2C-Measuring%2C-and-Modeling-Bureaucratic-Caughey-Cohon/d9d1a2b04642d10e9c4daf86ef8d074e3242a6ec
Deming, W. E. (1993). The New Economics for Industry, Government, and Education. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
Easton, D. (1965). A Framework for Political Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
French, W. L and Cecill, H. B. (1990). Organizational Development: Behavioral Science Interventions for Organization Improvement. (4thed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Henry, N. (2010). Public Administration and Public Affairs. (11th ed.). New York: Longman Simon.
Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D.P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy to Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Kinichi A. & Kreitner. R. (2003). Organizational Behavior. Boston Burt Ridge, IL: McGraw Hill Irwin.
Mayo, E. (1933). The Human Problem of an Industrial Civilization. New York: Macmillan Co.
Perry, J.L. (1991). Strategies for building Public Administration Theory. Research in public administration, 1, 1-18.
Porter, M.E. (1995). On Competition. Boston: Harvard Business Review Book.
Shafritz, Jay M. & Hyde, Albert C. (2007). Classics of Public Administration. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
Simonet, D. (2011). The New Public Management Theory and the Reform of European Health Care Systems: An International Comparative Perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(12), 815-826.
Taylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper & Brothers.
United Nations. (2021). What is Good Governance?. Retrieved from https:/ /www. unescap.org/sites/default/files/good-governance.pdf
Verhoest, K., et al. (2004). The Study of Organizational Autonomy: A Conceptual Review. Public Administration and Development, 24(2), 101-118.
Williamson, T., & Long, A. F. (2005). Qualitative data analysis using data display. Nurse Researcher, 12(3):7-19.
