Main Article Content
This article aimed to study the Risk Evaluation System and the electronic device assemble with the Court’s determination for provisional release in order to suit the case type and the accused or the defendant individually by studying laws, regulations, involving directives, and the issues arose from the courts order of provisional release. Due to the poverty of the accused or the defendant who have no security, property, or the bail as the surety, most of them are detained and lose the chance for provisional release that provoke the imbalance or injustice in the society as well as the issues of congestion in the prison due to the numbers of the detainees or inmates.
The study found that the provisional release procedure had its flaws due to the fact that the laws, regulations, and involving directives allowed the court to determine whether to ask for the security as the surety for the freedom of the accused or the defendant. The author of this article found the system of the Risk Evaluation System, the electronic device assemble with the Court’s determination for provisional release, and also the measure of controlling and pursuing the fugitive defendant released provisionally by the Court’s order are the measures that substitute the call for security, property, or the bail in order to reduce the injustice or imbalance in the society and to increase the opportunity of the accused or the defendant who had difficulties in economic to get the better chance for provisionally release and also to reduce the numbers of the detainees or inmates in the prison both prior to or during the Court’s trial.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
พระราชบัญญัติมาตรการกำกับและติดตาม จับกุมผู้หลบหนี การปล่อยตัวชั่วคราวโดยศาล พ.ศ. 2560