The Ride Sharing in case of student’s right in Civil and Commercial Law

Abstract

The researcher in this study to study concepts in ridesharing to the same path in specific contracts, according to the civil and commercial code, by comparison with employment contract found that the share of passengers on the same path, not access to the characteristics of Hire of work agreement. Because, according to the civil and commercial code section 587 requires that employment contract must have agreed on remuneration. No access to the characteristics of labour contract because the labour contract then, the employer has the authority command employees while working. Moreover, no access to the elements of the contract of carriage according to the civil and commercial code of Thailand because of the carriage to freight vehicles but are closer to a part of rental contract. In case of driving do not have their own car, the riders must sign a contract with a network operator providing taxi.

For the possibility to take advantage of Ride sharing services for students to study during the campus with Viangbua to Mae sa campus also is going to be less because most students also use private cars instead in case of the main bus service of the university is not available.

Business call taxi service is also illegal in Thailand because it is contrary to the Vehicles Act in 2522 B.E., But Ride sharing also useful in case of passengers’ desire to travel in a backcountry area that does not have a public taxi service, such as mountain or rural areas. Moreover, the Ride sharing service also available when public transport out of service time. Thus, Thailand should make it legal by statute regarding Ride shared laws. Design rules about who can be the motorists, including the requirements that public companies, entrepreneurs. Permission must be obtained from the State prior to perform the service.