Rojava: An Abstract State Sign of Self-Government the Kurdish People and Development of Democracy in the Middle East

Main Article Content

Yutthasart Norkaew

Abstract

This academic article focuses on the development of democracy in the Kurdish stateless territory of the Middle East. Calling themselves "Rojava" by considering about the abstract nature of the state in the form of "Anarchism," they are attempting to liberate their ethnic groups from the rule of other races by uniting together to form a "Social Contract" and have joined together in a referendum asking for the separation of territory from Syria to be established "Autonomous Region" where can act independently. By using the concept of democratic development as an important political landmark that calling this format "Democratic Federal," it consists of the smallest lower-level government in society, called the "Commune," and the upper-level government formed by the union of several communes in order to form another layer of joint projects or public affairs called "Canton," " Rojava" still lacks the key element of a nation-state, that is, "sovereignty," but this is not an obstacle to govern their own. Since the Syrian constitution favors Kurdish self-government, in addition the context is directly related to the ongoing civil war is still hot. It is inevitable that the Kurdish people will always depend on one another. For this reason, the Kurdish leaders have created a spatial discourse to forge ethnic feelings until it creates a symbol of integration that helps create more solidarity between each other, leading to the integrity of politics and governance that directly affects self-government capability and focuses on low-level sovereignty. As a result, the "Rojava" dream land implies self-government and sovereignty within a small, unified area, free of any outside commune in any all cases.

Article Details

How to Cite
Norkaew, Y. (2023). Rojava: An Abstract State Sign of Self-Government the Kurdish People and Development of Democracy in the Middle East. CRRU Law, Political Science and Social Science Journal, 7(2), 47–70. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/lawcrru/article/view/261863
Section
Academic Articles

References

ธิติ ไวกวี. “หลักอธิปไตยเหนือดินแดนที่ไม่สอดคล้องในยุคแอนโทรโปซีน.” วารสาร CMU Journal of Law and Social Sciences 12, ฉ.1 (มกราคม-มิถุนายน 2562): 1-21.

ยุทธศาสตร์ หน่อแก้ว. “รูปแบบการปกครองของกลุ่มแบ่งแยกดินแดนในตะวันออกกลาง: กรณีศึกษาเขตปกครองตนเองโรจาวา.” วารสารราชภัฏสุราษฎร์ธานี 9, ฉ.2 (กรกฎาคม-ธันวาคม 2565): 38-66.

ยุทธศาสตร์ หน่อแก้ว และพัชรี จิตเอื้ออังกูร. “บทวิเคราะห์เปรียบเทียบการจัดตั้งองค์กรปกครองส่วนท้องถิ่นรูปแบบคณะกรรมการตามหลักการกระจายอำนาจและการปกครองรูปแบบคณะกรรมการของสหพันธรัฐประชาธิปไตย กรณีศึกษาเขตปกครองตนเองโรจาวา (ซีเรียเหนือ).” วารสารมนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏอุบลราชธานี 12, ฉ.2 (กรกฎาคม-ธันวาคม 2564): 1-11.

Ali, B. Eroding the State in Rojava. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016.

ANHA. “Final statement of Autonomous Administration of North, East Syria.” Hawar News Agency. Entry posted September 7, 2018. https://hawarnews.com/en/haber/final-statement-of-autonomous-administration-of-north-east-syria-h3608.html. accessed December 30, 2022.

Bradley, Matt., Albayrak, Ayla. & Ballout, Dana. “Kurds Declare 'Federal Region' in Syria, Says Official.” Wall Street Journal. Entry posted March 24, 2016. https://www.wsj.com/articles/kurds-declare-federal-region-in-syria-says-official-145821 6404. accessed December 30, 2022.

Clark, Ian. Legitimacy in international society. UK: Oxford University Press, 2005.

Darwish, Sardar Mullah. “What federalism would mean for northern Syria.” Al-Monitor. Entry posted March 27, 2017. https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2017/03/syria-kurdish-democratic-council-arab-leader-federal.html?amp. accessed January 11, 2022.

Davies, Anna “Health after the Revolution: Rojava’s new approaches to health.” Kurdish Institute Brussels. https://www.kurdishinstitute.be/en/health-after-the-revolution-rojavas-new-approaches-to-health/. accessed January 21, 2023.

De Jong, Alex. “A Commune in Rojava?.” New Politics; New York 15 (Winter 4, 2016): 69-76.

Elassar, Alaa “Who are the Kurds and why are they under attack?.” Cable News Network (CNN). Entry posted October 10, 2019. https://edition.cnn.com/2019/10/09/world/kurds-in-syria-explainer-trnd/index.html. accessed December 27, 2022.

Espinosa, Elise Boyle & Ronan, Adam. “Rojava’s ‘war of education’: the role of education in building a revolutionary political community in North and East Syria.” Third World Quarterly (October, 2022): 1-19.

Fromkin, David. A Peace to End All Peace: The Fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Creation of the Modern Middle East. New York: H. Holt, 1989.

Graeber, David. Lost People: Magic and the Legacy of Slavery in Madagascar. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2007.

Harriet, Allsopp & Wladimir, Van Wilgenburg. The Kurds of Northern Syria: Governance, Diversity and Conflicts. UK: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019.

Harvard University. Current History, Volume 13. New York: Times Co., 1921.

Helmreich, Paul C. From Paris to Sèvres: The Partition of the Ottoman Empire at the Peace Conference of 1919–1920. OH: The Ohio State University Press, 1974.

Hosseini, Anahita. “The Spirit of the Spiritless Situation: The Significance of Rojava as an Alternative Model of Political Development in the Context of the Middle East.” Journal of Socialist Theory 44 (July 3, 2016): 253-265.

Jongerden, Joost. “Autonomy as a third mode of ordering: Agriculture and the Kurdish movement in Rojava and North and East Syria.” Journal of Agrarian Change 22 (September 3, 2021): 592-607.

Knapp, Michael & Jongerden, Joost. “Communal Democracy: The Social Contract and Confederalism in Rojava.” Comparative Islamic Studies 10 (1, 2016): 87-109.

Knapp, Michael & Jongerden, Joost. “Peace committees, platforms and the political ordering of society: Doing justice in the Federation of Northern and Eastern Syria (NES).” Kurdish Studies 8 (October 2, 2020): 297-312.

Küçük, Bülent & Özselçuk, Ceren. “The Rojava Experience: Possibilities and Challenges of Building a Democratic Life.” South Atlantic Quarterly 115 (January 1, 2016): 184-196.

Kurdish Institute of Paris. “The Kurdish population.” Fondation-Institut kurde de Paris. Entry posted January 12, 2017. https://www.institutkurde.org/en/info/the-kurdish-population-1232551004. accessed December 27, 2022.

Leezenberg, Michiel. “The ambiguities of democratic autonomy: the Kurdish movement in Turkey and Rojava.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16 (October 4, 2016): 671-690.

McMeekin, Sean. The Ottoman Endgame: War, Revolution, and the Making of the Modern Middle East, 1908-1923. UK: Penguin Random House, 2015.

Miller, Josh Platzky. “Radical Democracy and Educational Experiments: Lessons for South Africa from Brazil and Rojava.” South African Review of Sociology, 52 (June 2, 2022): 131-151.

Perry, Tom “Syrian Kurds, allies set to approve new government blueprint.” Reuters. Entry posted December 28, 2016. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-constitution-idUSKBN14H0X3?il=0. accessed January 20, 2023.

Perry, Tom “Syrian Kurds in six-month countdown to federalism,” Reuters. Entry posted April 12, 2016. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-federalism-idUSKCN0X90M9. access January 20, 2023.

Radpey, Loqman. “Self-Determination and Use of Force in Rojava.” Journal of Human Rights and Social Work 6 (May, 2021): 327–336.

Rogan, Eugene. The Fall of the Ottomans: The Great War in the Middle East. NY: Basic Books, 2015.

Tank, Pinar. “Kurdish Women in Rojava: From Resistance to Reconstruction.” Die Welt des Islams 57 (October 3, 2017): 404-428.

Üstündağ, Nazan. “Self-Defense as a Revolutionary Practice in Rojava, or How to Unmake the State.” South Atlantic Quarterly 115 (January 1, 2016): 197-210.