THE AFFECTING OF TEACHERS’ ATTITUDE ON TECHNOLOGY USAGE IN ONLINE TEACHING, UBON RATCHATHANI PRIMARY EDUCATION AREA OFFICE 2

Main Article Content

Papawee Mungnaglang
Soodjai Punsri
Siriporn Santaweesook
Somsat Tankham

Abstract

In order to study the relationship between teachers’ attitude on technology usage in online teaching, Ubon Ratchathani primary education area office 2, the researcher used a questionnaire and collected 400 respondents before analyzed the data by coefficient correlation analysis. The research results found that teacher attitude on technology usage related significantly to online teaching at high level, r = .82 (Sig .01). It can be conclude that the elements of online teaching in terms of student engagement and learning activities are the main importance teaching methods in online learning.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

กฤษณา สิกขมาน. (2554). การศึกษาผลสัมฤทธิ์ทางการเรียนรายวิชาการสื่อสารภาษาอังกฤษ

ธุรกิจโดยการใชการสอนแบบ E-Learning. รายงานการวิจัยเพื่อพัฒนาการเรียนการสอน มหาวิทยาลัยศรีปทุม.

กัญญ์สิริ จันทร์เจริญ. (2554). บทที่ 5 การกำหนดประชากรและกลุ่มตัวอย่าง,

https://www.ict.up.ac.th/surinthips/ResearchMethodology_2554....PDF

ประสพชัย พสุนนท์. (2557). ความเชื่อมั่นของแบบสอบถามในงานวิจัยเชิงปริมาณ, วารสาร

ปาริชาต มหาวิทยาลัยทักษิณ, 27(1), 144-163.

Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching

presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5 (2), 1 17.

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital learning compass: Distance education

enrollment report 2017. Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/digtiallearningcompassenrollment2017.pdf

Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses:

What do students find engaging ?. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1-13.

Firat, S. , & Tarik, K. (2016). Emotional presence in online learning scale: A

scale development study. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Vol 17(3), Pp 50-61 (2016), (3), 50. doi: 10.17718 / tojde.87040

Irwin, A.J. (2012). Phytoplankton niches estimated from field data. Limnology

and Oceanography, 57(3), 787-797,

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research

activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.

Li, Y., Wang, W., Lim, H.Y. (2021). Drosophila Solute Carrier 5A5 Regulates

Systemic Glucose Homeostasis by Mediating Glucose Absorption in the Midgut. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22(22): 12424.

Moate, R. M., & Cox, J. A. (2015). Learner-centered pedagogy: Consideration for

applications in a didactic course. Professional Counselor, 5(3), 379-389.

Nortvig, A. M. , Petersen, A. K. , & Balle, S. H. (2018). A literature review of the

factors influencing e-learning and blended learning in relation to learning outcome, student. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 16 (1), 46-55.

Woodworth, J. L., Raymond, M. E., Chirbas, K., Gonzalez, M., Negassi, Y., Snow,

W., & Van Donge, C. (2015). Online charter school study. Stanford, CA. Retrieved from https://credo.stanford.edu/pdfs/OnlineCharterStudyFinal2015.pdf

Zhang, J., & Zhang, J. (2009) “Influencing of online learning and the LICE

model.” e-Education Research 194(6): 73-77.