USING OF CIPPIEST MODEL FOR PRATHOMSUKSA CURRICULUM EVALUATION OF BANPRANGMOO (SRIWIT SUKSA) SCHOOL MUEANG DISTRICT PHATTHALUNG PROVINCE

Main Article Content

Amorntap Bunklang
Papas Panjiang

Abstract

The purpose of this research is using of CIPPIEST model for prathomsuksa curriculum evaluation of Banprangmoo (Sriwit Suksa) school Mueang district Phatthalung province. The CIPPIEST model is Context, Inputs, Process, Products, Impact, Effectiveness, Sustainability and Transportability. The located at Banprangmoo (Sriwit Suksa) school. The sample group includes 1 school director, 10 school committees, 10 teachers, 10 teachers who teach alumni, 93 students in Prathomsuksa 1-6, 77 parents, 5 alumni. The total is 201. By having 3 experts check the validdity of the instrument. The reliability of the instrument is testing 30 instrument and then calculate the alpha coefficient. The confidence level is 0.91, which is very good. The statistics used to analyze the data are percentages and Standard Deviation. The research results showed that 1) The analysis results of context evaluation were at a high level, The structure of the curriculum and content meet the objectives. 2) The analysis results of inputs evaluation were at a high level, Equipment, buildings conducive to teaching 3) The analysis results of process evaluation were at a high level, teaching and learning management, curriculum management 4) The analysis results of products evaluation were at a high level, the learner meets the objectives of the curriculum. 5) The analysis results of the impact evaluation were at a high level, the effect on the learners after graduating. 6) The analysis results of effectiveness evaluation were at a high level, the confidence of knowledge. 7) The analysis results of sustainability evaluation were at a high level, the knowledge and ability of learners in applying the knowledge gained from their studies. 8) The analysis results of transportability evaluation were at a high level, the effect on learners in expanding knowledge to others.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

ทีปทัศน์ ชินตาปัญญากุล, สมจิตรา เรืองศรี, กิตติศักดิ์ ลักษณา และ พรภิรมย์ หลงทรัพย์. (2560). การประเมินหลักสูตรแนวใหม่: รูปแบบ CIPPIEST. 2564, จากhttps://he01.tci-

thaijo.org/index.php/policenuurse/article/download/107970/85725/276047

รัตนะ บัวสนธ์. (2556). รูปแบบการประเมิน CIPP และ CIPIEST มโนทัศน์ที่คลาดเคลื่อนและ

ถูกต้องในการใช้ CIPP and CIPIEST Evaluation Models: Mistaken and Precise Concepts of Applications. https://so05.tcithaijo.org/index.php/article/download/257105/173483/

วัน เดชพิชัย. (2535). คู่มือการวิจัยและการประเมินโครงการทางการศึกษาพฤติกรรมศาสตร์. ปัตตานี: มนตรีบริการ.

วารีรัตน์ แก้วอุไร. (2549). หลักสูตรการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐานและการพัฒนาหลักสูตร. คณะ ศึกษาศาสตร์ : มหาวิทยาลัยนเรศวร.

Kanjanawasee, S. (2015). CIPP model for change: Meaning, importance, and development. Social Science Research Association of Thailand Journal.

Nillapun, M., Chatiwat, W., Torat, S., Thammetra, T., & Vanichwatanavorachai, S.

(2011). The curriculum evaluation on doctor of philosophy program in curriculum and instruction, faculty of education Silpakorn University. Nakhon Pathom: Silpakorn University.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation: Theory, models and applications. John Wiley and Son, Ine.