DEVELOPING OF ACTIVE LEARNING ACTIVITIES FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS TEACHING IN PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS

Abstract

The research objectives were 1) to develop active learning activities through action research process of graduate students in private schools 2) to survey for verifying the degree of encouragement and factors comprising of 6 aspects and 3) to study the student's attitude toward proactive learning management. The research target group was 30 students in the academic year 2021 obtained by purposive selection. It was Action research : Mixed Method consisting of 3 phases ; 1) surveying the needs of teacher students, 2) organizing training workshops, and 3) exploring the application at schools. There were 5 research tools, namely 1) Teacher Student Needs Survey 2) Practical Training Package 3) Model Survey. 4) a questionnaire on satisfactory towards active learning and 5) The questionnaire of satisfaction.

 The results of the research were as follows :

1. Graduate teacher students had the first two types of activities 1) while attending in Seminar Class formats and techniques : Project works 18 people 6 pieces ( 60 percent) ,STEM Education 9 people 3 pieces ( 30 percent), others 3 people 1 piece ( 10 percent) and 2) the first two types of activities in 2 semesters : Project works 8 people (26.67 percent) ,STEM Education 6 people (20 percent), Each school had the best work at the gold medal level in the 69 ^th Arts and Crafts Fair went to Suanson Khon Kaen School.


2. Factors affecting performance after operational training in the teachers' opinion, there were 6 issues, 6 areas at the “most” level: 1) Curriculum and active learning lessons, promoted at the highest level, there were media and learning resources. So that teachers could easily use the media curriculum for lessons. 2) Teachers' side was promoted at the highest level , it included creating a learning community for teachers in the school to improve the quality of teachers' teaching. 3) Educational institution administrators, the highest level included giving encouragement to make teachers have confidence. and have a good attitude towards proactive learning management 4) On the learner side, there was promotion at the highest level , namely participation in reflecting on learning results in active learning activities 5) Committee aspect there was promotion at a highest level , Participating in decision making and supervision and 6) Networking was promoted at the highest level, it was supported by the same network of educational institutions.


3.   Student satisfaction in active learning management was at the highest level in all aspects (X̅= 4.62, S.D.= 0.57) and the most satisfaction was the Lecturer (X̅= 4.69, S.D.= 0.07)