A Construction of Metacognition Test for Prathomsuksa VI Students under Chumphon Primary Educational Service Area Office 2

Authors

  • Yaovalak Jannarong Kasetsart University, Thailand
  • Eakapoom Jantarakhantee Kasetsart University, Thailand
  • Chatsiri Piyapimonsit Kasetsart University, Thailand

Keywords:

Construct of Metacognition Test, Metacognition, Local Norms

Abstract

The objective of this research was to construct of metacognition Test for prathom suksa VI students under chumphon primary educational service aea office 2. The specific objectives were 1) to construct of metacognition test for prathomsuksa Vi students; 2) to validate the construct of metacognition Test; 3) to establish grade norms of the construct of metacognition test; and 4) to construct the manual of the construction of metacognition test for prathomsuksa VI students under chumphon primary educational service area office 2. All samples were prathomsuksa VI students who studied in chumphon primary educational service area office 2 in the second semester, academic year 2018. Data were collected from 367 samples by using multistage random sampling technique.
The research findings were as follow: The construction of aetacognition test for prathomsuksa VI students consisted of 2 elements: metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive experience. There were 2 forms of the test, each item with 30 items. The metacognition test were two-tier multiple choice and self report. The analysis showed that the item objective congruence Index (IOC) between 0.60-1.00, discrimination index between 0.34-0.96 and item reliability was 0.89. The construct validity of the measure was quite well. Factor loading in each question was between 0.085-0.792. This norm referenced to the whole test was between T30-T62. This manual could be used for the measuring Metacognitive skills with complete details and could be applied appropriately and practically, easy to understand, and fully important composition.

References

Chaiso, P. (2002). Advanced Educational Measurement and Evaluation. Bangkok: Kasetsart University.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.

Kanchanawasi, S. (2009). Classical test theory. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.

Khammanee, T. (2012). Teaching science: knowledge for effective learning process management. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Publisher.

Kitpridaborrisut, B. (2010). Techniques for creating data collection tools for research. Bangkok: Srianan Publisher.

Rattakul, C. (2009). Measurement Techniques. Bangkok: Srinakharinwirot University Press.

Suabkaoe, Y. (2008). Development of a metacognition test for lower secondary school students. The dissertation of M.Ed. Graduate School: Chulalongkorn University.

Tamir, A. (1989). Training Teachers to Teach Effectively in the Laboratory: Science Teacher Education. https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sce.3730730106 (Accessed 15 March 2020).

The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST). (2012). Evaluation of scientific evaluation. Bangkok: SE-ED Publisher.

Trirakanan, S. (2008). Social Sciences Research Methodology: Practice. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

Jannarong, Y. ., Jantarakhantee, E. ., & Piyapimonsit , C. . (2020). A Construction of Metacognition Test for Prathomsuksa VI Students under Chumphon Primary Educational Service Area Office 2. Phimoldhamma Research Institute Journal, 7(2), 29–40. retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/prij/article/view/243027

Issue

Section

Research Article (บทความวิจัย)