The Components of an Innovative Work Behaviors Scale for Personnel of Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
Keywords:
Components, Innovative Work Behaviors, Electricity Generating Authority of ThailandAbstract
The purpose of this research was to; 1) analyze the components of an Innovative Work Behaviors Scale for Personnel of Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand, 2) Examining the alignment of the organizational behavior structure towards innovation in the operational framework of Thailand's electricity production sector with observational data. The participants were 316 Electricity Generating Authority administrators, this research used the simple sampling method. The instrument was a 5rating scale questionnaire. The reliability of questionnaire in the form of an alpha coefficient was 0.95. The statistical data analysis were frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis.
The research result finds that:
1. The order of importance of the component of an Innovative Work Behaviors Scale for Personnel of Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand as follows: 1) Idea exploration 2) Idea generation 3) Idea championing and 4) Idea implementing.
2. The results of the structural validity test of Innovative Work Behaviors Scale for Personnel of Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand model showed that Chi-square (χ2) = 355.157, df =301, χ2/df (CMIN/DF) = 1.30, RMR = 0.03, RMSEA = 0.91, GFI = 0.992, AGFI = 0.90 and CFI = 0.99 Based on the findings, it indicated that Innovative Work Behaviors Scale for Personnel of Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand model was consistent with empirical data significantly.
References
การไฟฟ้าฝ่ายผลิตแห่งประเทศไทย (กฟผ.). (2565). โครงสร้างองค์กรฝ่ายทรัพยากรบุคคลการไฟฟ้าฝ่ายผลิตแห่งประเทศไทย. เข้าถึงได้จาก http:www.intranet.egat.co.th
_______. (2565). รายงานประจำปี พ.ศ. 2564. เข้าถึงได้จาก https://www.egat.co.th/images/businessop/annual-report/2564/annual-report-64-th.pdf
กุลชลี จงเจริญ. (2561). ภาวะผู้นำเชิงนวัตกรรม. เข้าถึงได้จาก https://thaitgri.org/?p=36172
พูลพงศ์ สุขสว่าง. (2557). หลักการวิเคราะห์โมเดลสมการโครงสร้าง. วารสารมหาวิทยาลัยนราธิวาสราชนครินทร์, 6(2), 136-145.
สำนักงานคณะกรรมการนโยบายรัฐวิสาหกิจ. (2564). คู่มือการประเมินผลการดำเนินงานรัฐวิสาหกิจ. เข้าถึงได้จาก http://www.sepo.go.th/pes/contents/27
Bos-Nehles, A. C., Renkema, M., & Janssen, M. (2017). HRM and innovative work behaviour: A systematic literature review. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1228-1253.
De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behavior. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41-64.
_______. (2008). Innovative work behavior: Measurement and validation. Retrieved from http://ondernemerschap.panteia.nl/pdf-ez/h200820.pdf
_______. (2010). Measuring Innovative Work Behaviors. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.
Dörner, N. (2012). Innovative Work Behavior: The Roles of Employee Expectations and Effects on Job Performance. (Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation). Switzerland: University of St. Gallen.
Hall, L. M. (2003). Nursing staff mix models and outcomes. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44(2), 217-226.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53-60.
Likert, R. (1976). New Ways of Management conflict. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Middelkoop, C. (2016). How does innovative work behavior of employee effect their individual job performance. (Master thesis). Netherlands: University of twenty, Netherlands.
Nasir, S., et al. (2013). Modern entrepreneurship and E-business innovations. USA: IGI Global.
Needleman, J., et al. (2002). Nurse-staffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals. New England Journal of Medicine, 346(22), 1715-1722.
Yamane, T. (1973). Taro Statistic: An Introductory Analysis. New York: Harper & row.
