The Curriculum Evaluation on Master Degree of Education in Curriculum and Instrution, Faculty of Bangkokthonburi University

Abstract

This research aimed to evaluate the Master of Education Program in Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education, Bangkokthonburi University, in 4 aspects: 1) Context evaluation, 2) Input evaluation, 3) Process evaluation, and 4) Product evaluation. This is a quantitative research, The population consisted of 3 curriculum managers, 6 lecturers, 6 students, 29 graduates, and 1 curriculum director, totaling 45 people. The statistics used in the data analysis were frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation.
The research results found that:
1. The results of the context evaluation found that overall, the respondents had opinions on the curriculum's vision, curriculum's vision, curriculum's objectives, and family and community environment at a high level. When considering each group of respondents, it was found that students had the highest opinions, while the curriculum's managers The lecturers, graduate students, and program directors had high opinions.
2. The results of the evaluation of input factors found that overall, the respondents had high opinions about personnel, media, materials/equipment, learning resources, buildings, budgets, and projects/activities supporting or promoting the program. When considering each group of respondents, the person in charge of the program had the highest opinions, while the lecturers, graduate students, and program directors had high opinions.
3. The results of the evaluation of the process found that overall, the respondents had high opinions about the program administration, organizing learning experiences, and organizing student-centered teaching and learning, and the measurement and evaluation process. When considering each group of respondents, the person in charge of the program had the highest opinions, while the lecturers, graduate students, and program directors had high opinions.
4. The results of the evaluation of outputs found that overall, the respondents had high opinions about the characteristics of learners according to the goals and targets of student development. When considering each group of respondents, the person in charge of the program had the highest opinions, while the lecturers, graduate students, and program directors had high opinions.