Relationship between Sangkhatadhamma with Asangkhatadhamma: The study of the relationship between Nibbãna with Sangkhatadhamma

Abstract

This academic paper aims to prese Relationship between Sangkhata dhamma with Asangkhatadhamma is study about of Conditioned things and Unconditioned. There are many kinds of Asangkhatadhamma. In this article, only the relationship between Nibbãna with Sangkhatadhamma was studied.
The study found that there are three differences in the characteristics of Sangkhatadhamma and Asangkhata dhamma. There are three characteristics of the Sangkhatadhamma: 1) arising appear, 2) quenching appear, 3) during existence, a change appears. As for the three characteristics of Asangkhatadhamma, they are 1) non-appearing 2) non-appearing cessation. 3) While there was no change to anything else. The Sangkhatadhamma in this article refers to the condition of the Dharma that has been manipulated by factors. These are the five aggregates: form, feeling, perception, body and spirit, and the three paramatthadhammas, namely form, mind and cetasika. There are many kinds of Asaṅkhatadhamma in this article that only refer to nibbãna. Nibbãna is a kind of natural real estate.There are two types of nibbãna: 1) Saupãdisesa nibbãna, Nibbãna has remnants ornibbanastill has leaven left; 2) Anupãdisesa nibbãna, Nibbãnahas no restraints. or nibbãna without any remaining leaven. The appearance of the Sangkhattadharma There are two things that are required by nature: 1) nature for supporting its emergence 2) nature for comparison e.g. Bodhisatta Samanasidhattha asceticism until he is able to shake off the sangkhatadhamma, became a Buddha. The nature to support the emergence is nibbãna or anutarasamma samphodhiṅana. But the natural part for comparison is Buddhahood a noble person shake off from the ordinary. From the above relationship Nibbãna is therefore related to the Sangkhatadhamma as a support or the basis for Sangkhatadhamma. If there is no Asaṅkhatadhamma to support There is no escaping from the Sangkhatadhamma. The analogy is like that side is the support of this side. If there is no other side It is impossible to say that crossing over to the other side is not possible.