Is Strategy an Art or a Science

Authors

  • Phithoon Thongprayat Naval Education Department
  • Kullmanoch Wanwarn Naval Operation Department

Keywords:

Strategy, Art, Science

Abstract

It is inevitable to state that the strategy is a combination of art and science nowadays. Artistic aspects of strategy mean something subjective that is created by the creative imagination of the person, while the scientific aspects of strategy mean something empirical that is objectively true. In ancient times, the word “strategy” was specifically related in antiquity to the profession of commanders to develop combat plans against opposing forces, which appears to be more like what we now call as “tactics”. Success and victory in battles were proofs that showed the prowess and ability of commanders to lead their subordinates to conquer their enemies. Strategy, as pure art was traditionally seen in the fifth century until the First World War, as the skill and expertise of the commanders who created battle strategies, which became the critical determinant of success in war. In this sense, a skilful strategist was seen as someone with an accumulation of combat experiences, who is capable of demonstrating a successful combination of instincts and tactics in a crisis. However, the view of strategy as science has gained momentum as emerging innovations and technologies were deemed essential to the success of military operations since the First World War. Despite this acceptance of science as an aspect of strategy, some scholars argue that art continues to be a crucial aspect of strategy due to the unforeseeable challenges of globalisation. Whether the strategy is an art or a science remains an open issue, it is evident that it may be something of both.

References

art. (2020). In Merriam-Webster. Retrieved January 20, 2020 from https://www.merriam webster.com/dictionary/art

ASLAN, M. M. (2017). HITLER’S WAY OF PROPAGANDA. ASOS Journal, 5(52), 374-382.

Biddle, T. D. (2015). Strategy and Grand Strategy: What Students and Practitioners Need to Know. Pennsylvania, US.: US Army War College Press.

Brands, H. (2014). What good is grand strategy? : power and purpose in American

statecraft from Harry S. Truman to George W. Bush. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Edwards, A. (2017). Strategy in War and Peace: A Critical Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Fanning, W. J., Jr. (1997). The Origin of the Term "Blitzkrieg": Another View. The Journal of Military History, 61(2), 283-302.

Freedman, L. (2013). Strategy: A History. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

French, D. (2006). The Strategy of Unlimited Warfare?: Kitchener, Robertson, and Haig. In R. Chickering & S. Förster (Eds.), Great War, Total War : Combat and Mobilization on the Western Front, 1914-1918. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Gat, A. (2001). A History of Military Thought: From the Enlightenment to the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gray, C. S. (2016). Strategy and Politics. New York: Routledge.

Handel, M. I. (2005). Masters of War: Classical Strategic Thought. London: Frank Cass Publishers.

Hastings, M. (1984). Overlord: D-Day and the battle for Normandy. New York : Simon and Schuster.

Heuser, B. (2010). The Evolution of Strategy: Thinking War from Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.

Heuser, B. (2015). The history of the practice of strategy from Antiquity to Napoleon. In

J. Baylis, J. J. Wirtz & C. S. Gray (Eds.), Strategy in the Contemporary World: An Introduction to Strategic Studies. (pp. 17-32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heuser, B. (2016). Theory and Practice, Art and Science in Warfare: An Etymological Note. In D. Marston & T. Leahy (Eds.), War, Strategy and History. (pp. 180). Acton, ACT: Australian National University Press.

Kagan, D. (1987). World War I, World War II, World War III. Commentary, 83(3), 21.

Lykke, C. A. F., Jr. (1989). Defining Military Strategy. Military Review, 69: 2-8.

Mahan, A. T. (1911). Naval strategy compared and contrasted with the principles and practice of military operations on land. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.

Mahnken, T. G. (2015). Strategic Theory. In J. Baylis, J. J. Wirtz & C. S. Gray (Eds.), Strategy in the Contemporary World: An Introduction to Strategic Studies. (pp. 60). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Meiser, J. W. (2016). Ends + Ways + Means = (Bad) Strategy. Parameters; Carlisle Barracks, 46: 81-91.

Murray, W., & Grimsley, M. (1994). Introduction: On strategy. In W. Murray, M. Knox and A. Bernstein (Eds.), The Making of Strategy: Rulers, States, and War. (pp.19). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Paret, P, Craig, G. A., & Gilbert, F. (Eds.). (1986). Makers of Modern Strategy: from Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Renault, M. (1975). The Nature of Alexander. New York: Open Road Integrated Media.

Reveron, D. S., & Cook, J. L. (2009). Developing Strategists: Translating National Strategy into Theater Strategy. Joint Force Quarterly, 55(4), 21-28.

Sloan, E. C. (2012). Modern Military Strategy: An Introduction. Routledge: New York.

Strachan, H. (2005). The lost meaning of strategy. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 47(3), 33-54.

Strachan, H. (2013). The Direction of War: Contemporary Strategy in Historical Perspective. (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Till, G. 2009. Seapower: A Guide for the Twenty-First Century. New York: Routledge.

Tripathi, R. (1939). ALEXANDER'S INVASION OF INDIA : A REVISED STUDY. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 3: 348-370.

United States. Department of Defense. (2018). Summary of the 2018 national defense strategy of the United States of America. [Washington, D.C.] : U.S. Department of Defense.

Vego, M. N. (2003). Naval strategy and operations in narrow seas. London: Frank Cass.

Downloads

Published

28-08-2020

Issue

Section

Academic Article