IDEARR Model: A STEM Education Framework for Developing STEM Career Interest

Authors

  • Theeraphob Kapkraikaew Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University
  • Atswanonthapakorn Thanetweeraphat Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University

Keywords:

STEM education, IDEARR Model, STEM career interest

Abstract

This article aims to analyze and explain the IDEARR model (Initiating, Deconstruction, Explanation, Application, Review, Reporting) as a conceptual framework for STEM education and to propose guidelines for applying this model to enhance STEM career interest in accordance with the components of the STEM Career Interest Survey (STEM-CIS).
The conceptual analysis reveals that a distinguishing feature of the IDEARR model is the Review process, which functions as a central driving mechanism of learning by being embedded iteratively throughout every stage in a cyclical manner. This enables learners to continuously monitor, refine, and deepen their own understanding. Such a process reinforces causal reasoning, the connection between evidence and conclusions, and the systematic development of problem-solving approaches. Furthermore, instruction delivered through the IDEARR model demonstrates potential for enhancing the psychological factors associated with STEM career interest - particularly self - efficacy beliefs and outcome expectations - through the design of activities that afford learners opportunities to engage with authentic problems, participate in hands-on practice, and engage in sustained reflective thinking. In conclusion, the IDEARR instructional model represents a promising pedagogical approach capable of concretely elevating the quality of STEM learning and promoting learners' career interest. It is therefore well-suited for application in teaching practice, curriculum development, and future educational research.

References

พุทธชาด อังณะกูร, ธิดา ทับพันธ์, และเสมอกาญจน์ โสภณหิรัญรักษณ์. (2563). การวิเคราะห์ความสนใจ และเจตคติต่อเนื้อหาและอาชีพด้านสะเต็มของนักเรียนระดับมัธยมศึกษาปีที่ 3 ในเขตกรุงเทพมหานครและปริมณฑล. วารสารบัณฑิตศึกษา มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏวไลยอลงกรณ์ ในพระบรมราชูปถัมภ์, 14(2), 105-125.

Aguilera, D., Lupiáñez, J. L., Perales-Palacios, F. J., & Vílchez-González, J. M. (2024). IDEARR model for STEM education-A framework proposal. Education Sciences, 14(6), 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060638

Burrows, A. C., Borowczak, M., Myers, A., Schwortz, A. C., & McKim, C. (2021). Integrated STEM for teacher professional learning and development: “I need time for practice.” Education Sciences, 11(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010021

Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30–35.

Kier, M. W., Blanchard, M. R., Osborne, J. W., & Albert, J. L. (2014). The development of the STEM Career Interest Survey (STEM-CIS). Research in Science Education, 44(3), 461– 481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9389-3

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.

Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027

National Research Council. (2011). Successful K–12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The National Academies Press.

NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. The National Academies Press.

Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. Jossey-Bass.

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO.

Downloads

Published

15-07-2026