Research on the content structure of organizational responsiveness of private colleges
คำสำคัญ:
Colleges, organizational responsiveness, Flexible decision-making, Recognition and early-warning, Social relations, Responsive implementationบทคัดย่อ
The content structure of organizational responsiveness of private colleges is an innovative research area. Combining the research results of organizational responsiveness of private colleges in both China and western world and based on the current development of private colleges in China, this paper first defines the content structure of organizational responsiveness of private collegesthrough interviews, questionnaires and other methods, then forms questionnaires for preliminary testto have an in-depth study on the content structure of organizational responsiveness of private colleges in China, and finally constructs measurement scalesfor the content structure,testing reliability and validity of the scales.
References
Claus, D. J. &Loizos, T. H. (2005). Answers for questions to come: reflective di-alogue as an enabler of strategic innovation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vo1. 18 No. 4, pp. 338-352.
James, H.,Faizul, H. &Patrick, K. (2007). Measuring organizational responsiveness: the development of a validated survey instrument. Management Decision. Vo1.45No.l Opp.1573-1594.
Magali,A.D. &Michael, W. T. (2008).Organizational Responses to Environmental Demands:Opening the Black Box. Strategic Management Journal. 29, no. 10:1027-1055.
Leonard-Barton, D. A. (1992). Core Capabilities &Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development.Strategic Management Journal. (13):111-I25.
Itami,H. & Tsuyoshi, N. (1992). Dynamic interaction between strategy and technology.Strategic Management Journal. 13 (SPECIAL ISSUE):119-135
Rumelt,R.P.,Dan, E. S. & David, J.T.(1994).Fundamental Issues in Strategy. Harvard Business School Press.
Eisenhardt, K. M. &Martin, J.A.(2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they?.StrategicManagement Journal.21.PP: 1105-1121.
Helfat, C. E. &Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles.Strategic Management Journal, 24(10):997-1010.
Timothy, M.G. (2005). Interfirm competition for human resources:evidence from thesoftware industry.Academy of management journal ,VoL48. No.2.237-256.
James, H.,Faizul, H. &Patrick, K. (2007). Measuring organizational responsiveness: the development of a validated survey instrument. Management Decision. Vo1.45No.l Opp.1573-1594.
Magali,A.D. &Michael, W. T. (2008).Organizational Responses to Environmental Demands:Opening the Black Box. Strategic Management Journal. 29, no. 10:1027-1055.
Leonard-Barton, D. A. (1992). Core Capabilities &Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development.Strategic Management Journal. (13):111-I25.
Itami,H. & Tsuyoshi, N. (1992). Dynamic interaction between strategy and technology.Strategic Management Journal. 13 (SPECIAL ISSUE):119-135
Rumelt,R.P.,Dan, E. S. & David, J.T.(1994).Fundamental Issues in Strategy. Harvard Business School Press.
Eisenhardt, K. M. &Martin, J.A.(2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they?.StrategicManagement Journal.21.PP: 1105-1121.
Helfat, C. E. &Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles.Strategic Management Journal, 24(10):997-1010.
Timothy, M.G. (2005). Interfirm competition for human resources:evidence from thesoftware industry.Academy of management journal ,VoL48. No.2.237-256.
Downloads
เผยแพร่แล้ว
2020-12-26
