The The Relationship between the Social Responsibility Investment disclosure and the firms’ market values
Main Article Content
Abstract
Social Responsibility Investment (SRI) is an investment that generates returns for business
whilst creates value-added for society. This study aimed to investigate the limitation level of SRI
Disclosure and to study the relationship between the disclosure corresponded with and the firms’
market values of the listed companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. The annual report data
during the years 2015–2018 (400 data) was analyzed by using content analysis. The finding
indicated that SRI disclosure was disclosed at the minimal level, Form of Disclosure (FD) lines,
Nature of Disclosure (ND) and Location of Disclosure (LD) disclosed at the minimal. Moreover, the
result indicated that SRI disclosure had correlation with the firms’ market value. Besides, the said
disclosure was voluntary-based, and technically in Thailand, it was in the initial stages. In principle,
Social Responsibility Investment disclosure positively impacts Social Return on Investment (SROI),
and essentially increases the firm values overtime
Article Details
ลิขสิทธิ์ของบทความ
ผลงานที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของมหาวิทยาลัยหอการค้าไทย ห้ามมิให้นำเนื้อหา ทัศนะ หรือข้อคิดเห็นใด ๆ ของผลงานไปทำซ้ำ ดัดแปลง หรือเผยแพร่ ไม่ว่าทั้งหมดหรือบางส่วนโดยไม่ได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษรจากมหาวิทยาลัยหอการค้าไทยก่อน
References
ณัฐศิริ บุญชวน. (2558). Social Investment. SD Focus, 2(3), 18-20.
Atkins, J., & Maroun, W. (2015). Integrated reporting in South Africa in 2012. Meditari Accountancy Research, 23(2), 197-221. doi: 10.1108/MEDAR-07-2014-0047
Ball, R., & Brown, P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of accounting research, 6(2), 159-178. doi: org/10.2307/2490232
Barako, D. G. (2007). Determinants of voluntary disclosures in Kenyan companies annual reports. African Journal of Business Management, 1(5), 77-100.
Beaver, W. H. (1968). The information content of annual earnings announcements. Journal Accounting Research, 6, 67-92. doi: 10.2307/2490070
Clarkson, P. M., Kao, J. L., & Richardson, G. D. (1994). The voluntary inclusion of forecasts in the MD & A section of annual reports. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(1), 423-450.
Collins, D. W., Maydew, E. L., Weiss, I. S. (1997). Change in the value-relevance of earning and book values over the past forty years. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 39-67. doi: org/10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00015-3
Cortez, M. C., Silva, F., & Areal, N. (2009). The performance of European socially responsible funds. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(4), 573-588.
Dai, J., Lu, C., Yang, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2018). Is the social responsibility information disclosed by the companies really valuable? Evidence from Chinese stock price synchronicity. Sustainability, 10(10), 3578. doi: 10.3390/su10103578
Dechow, P. M. (1994). Accounting earnings and cash flow as measures of firm performance: the role of accounting accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18(1), 3-42.
Easton, P. D., & Harris, T. S. (1991). Earnings as an explanatory variable for returns. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(1), 19-36. doi: org/10.2307/2491026
Feltham, G. A., & Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 689-731.
Firth, M. (1976). The impact of earnings announcements on the share price behaviour of similar type firms. The Economic Journal, 86(342), 296-306.
Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364-369.
Furr, R. M. (2008). Summary of effect sizes and their links to inferential statistics. Retrieved September 24, 2009. from http://furrrm.sites.wfu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/EffectSizeFormulas.pdf
Jizi, M., Nehme, R., & Salama, A. (2016). Do social responsibility disclosures show improvements on stock price?. The Journal of Developing Areas, 50(2), 77-95.
Joly, C. (2012). Reality and potential of responsible investment. In Vandekerckhove W., Leys J., Alm
K., Scholtens B., Signori S., Schäfer H. (eds). Responsible Investment in Times of Turmoil (pp. 193-210). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Lee, K. W., & Yeo, G. H. H. (2016). The association between integrated reporting and firm valuation. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 47(4), 1221-1250.
Madhavan, A., & Dallas, G. S. (2002). Security prices and market transparency. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 5(3), 255-283.
Mita, A. F., Silalahi, H. F. & Halimatussadiah, A. (2018). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure and banks’ financial performance in five ASEAN countries. Journal of Economics Business and Accountancy Ventura, 21(2), 159-167.
Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Earning, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661-687.
Phoprachak, D. (2018). Influence of firm size on cost of capital through corporate social responsibility disclosure of the listed companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. PSAKU International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 7(1), 171-181.
Reverte, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and market valuation: evidence from Spanish listed firms. Review of Managerial Science, 10(2), 411-435.
Shehata, N. F. (2013). How could board diversity influence corporate disclosure. Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, 9(3), 42-49.
Steenkamp, N., & Northcott, D. (2007). Content analysis in accounting research: the practical challenges. Australian Accounting Review, 17(43), 12-25.
Suttipun, M. (2017). The effect of integrated reporting on corporate financial performance: Evidence from Thailand. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(1), 133-142.
Unerman, J. (1999). A critique of content analysis as a research method for corporate social reporting. In Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, City University of New York