Regulation of OTT TV (Over-the-Top TV) in an Era of New Technologies

Main Article Content

Prapanpong Khumon

Abstract

In this era of technological advancements, OTT TV services have emerged as strong contenders in the broadcasting industry. TV broadcasting service providers worldwide need to adapt to this progress in order to stay competitive. OTT TV service providers have an advantage in the market as they can leverage existing mobile and broadband network infrastructures, eliminating the need for new investments.


In Thailand, there is no licensing scheme for OTT TV services. This leaves the services to be largely unregulated by the National Broadcasting and Telecommunication Commission (NBTC). This creates an unfair competition for existing license holders who are traditional TV broadcasting providers who already have costs in a network investment, costs of being regulated, and costs of tax and associated fee in carrying out regulated services.


This research aims to study law, policy, and practices of other countries in relation to the regulation of OTT TV services in order to recommend a policy reform for Thailand.


The study finds that the regulator should revise existing laws to be able to regulate OTT TV services. In addition, there should be measures to promote competency of Thai OTT TV players to be able to compete at the global level

Article Details

How to Cite
Khumon, P. (2024). Regulation of OTT TV (Over-the-Top TV) in an Era of New Technologies. University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce Journal Humanities and Social Sciences, 44(1), 117–134. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/utccjournalhs/article/view/268052
Section
Research Articles

References

จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย, ศูนย์บริการวิชาการ. (2563). รายงานผลการศึกษาฉบับสมบูรณ์ (Final Report) โครงการศึกษาผลกระทบของ OTT ต่อกิจการกระจายเสียงและกิจการโทรทัศน์และแนวทางการส่งเสริมการกำกับดูแล. สืบค้นจาก https://www.nbtc.go.th/Information/ผลการศึกษาวิจัย/49215.aspx

ณัฏฐชาติ พวงสุดรัก. (2560). สํารวจตลาด OTT กับการชิงพื้นที่ทีวีในอนาคต (ตอนที่ 1). ใน รายงานสภาพตลาดกิจการการะจายเสียงและกิจการโทรทัศน์ (น. 15-21). สืบค้นจาก https://broadcast.nbtc.go.th/data/academic/file/600400000001.pdf

เบญญาทิพย์ ลออโรจน์วงศ์, และดามิยา พงศ์ตานี. (2564). Thailand’s OTT market overview: ภาพรวมสภาพตลาดผู้ให้บริการ OTT ในประเทศไทย. สืบค้นเมื่อ 17 กันยายน 2564, จาก https://broadcast.nbtc.go.th/data/ott/[Infographic]%20Thailand's%20OTT.pdf

Australia Competition & Consumer Commission. (2021). News media bargaining code. Retrieved September 16, 2022, from https://www.accc.gov.au/by-industry/digital-platforms-and-services/news-media-bargaining-code/news-media-bargaining-code

Burkhart, C. (2017). The CNC video tax is now applicable to audiovisual services established outside of France and free platforms. Retrieved September 16, 2022, from https://www.nomosparis.com/the-cnc-video-tax-is-now-applicable-to-audiovisual-services-established-outside-of-france-and-free-platforms/

Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive). (2010). Official Journal of the European Union, 53, 1-24. Retrieved from

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:095:0001:0024:en:PDF

Goldfarb, C. B. (2013). Updating the statutory framework for communications for the digital age: Issues for Congress. Retrieved September 16, 2022, from https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20130930_R43248_5b525bb3e1b3ea4a68eefe1d4e10afbac883fba1.html#_Toc370822041

Isa, A. M., Mahmud, W. A. W., Sulaiman, W. I. W., & Pitchan, M. A. (2019). Netflix and dilemma of content regulation in Malaysia. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(16), 460-468.

Ofcom. (2020). Ofcom functions and roles. Retrieved September 16, 2022, from https://www.ofcom.org.uk/about/how-ofcom-is-run/committees/england/role

Ofcom. (2021). Rules and guidance: Statutory rules and non-binding guidance for providers of on-demand programme services (ODPS). Retrieved from https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0029/229358/ODPS-Rules-and-Guidance.pdf

Polson, C. (2020, February 11). Enterprise video: IPTV vs OTT [Weblog message]. Retrieved from https://www.haivision.com/blog/enterprise-video-answers/enterprise-video-iptv-vs-ott

Ramachandran, N. (2019). Singapore’s IMDA partners with Viacom and Hooq to co-fund content. Retrieved September 16, 2022, from https://variety.com/2019/digital/asia/singapores-imda-partners-with-asian-streamer-hooq-to-co-fund-content-1203421712/

Scott, M. (2019). Singapore establishes co-production fund as Asia TV forum & market wraps. Retrieved September 16, 2022, from https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/singapore-establishes-production-fund-as-asia-tv-forum-market-wraps-1262151/#!

Starks, M. (2014). Digital convergence and content regulation. Journal of European Television History & Culture, 3(6), 125-135. doi:10.18146/2213-0969.2014.jethc075

Statista. (n.d.). Revenue of advertising based video on demand (AVoD) in online audiovisual industry in Thailand in 2012 and 2016 with a forecast for 2020. Retrieved September 16, 2022, from

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1180047/thailand-revenue-advertising-based-video-on-demand-in-online-audiovisual-industry/

Telecommunications business act. (2018). Retrieved September 16, 2022, from https://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_service/lawView.do?hseq=50189&lang=ENG

Tsuchiya, A. (2020). How Japanese broadcasters are uniting to compete in OTT. Retrieved September 16, 2022, from https://streamhub.co.uk/how-japanese-broadcasters-are-uniting-to-compete-in-ott/