DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTEGRATED LEARNING MODEL COMBINING STAR STEMS AND DESIGN THINKING APPROACHES TO ENHANCE CREATIVE THINKING AND PROBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS AMONG HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS
Keywords:
Integrated learning model, Creative thinking skills, Problem-solving skills, STAR STEMS, Design ThinkingAbstract
This research and development (R&D) study aimed to analyze the gap between STAR STEMS and Design Thinking approaches, to develop an integrated learning model combining the strengths of both approaches, to test the effectiveness of the developed model, and to study students' learning processes and attitudes toward the model. The study employed a mixed methods research design using research and development methodology. Participants were divided into two groups: 15 experts for gap analysis and model quality validation, and 120 undergraduate students for effectiveness testing over a 12-week period. Research instruments comprised the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking adapted version, the Problem Solving Inventory adapted version, an attitudes and confidence questionnaire, and a semi-structured interview protocol. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, Effect Size, IOC, Fleiss' Kappa, and content analysis. Gap analysis revealed that STAR STEMS excelled in connecting with Thai contexts and social wisdom, while Design Thinking demonstrated strength in interdisciplinary integration and systematic thinking processes. The developed iDiamonds model comprised 9 components: i-Integrated, D-Discover, I-Innovate, A-Apply, M-Master, O-Optimize, N-Network, D-Develop, and S-Social Wisdom, passing content validity testing (IOC = 0.77). Effectiveness testing showed that the iDiamonds model significantly improved creative thinking skills by 20.2% (Cohen's d = 0.65) and problem-solving skills by 18.9% (Cohen's d = 0.77) (p<0.001). Additionally, remarkable positive changes were observed in learning confidence. Integration of quantitative and qualitative data revealed six key mechanisms underlying the model's effectiveness, including the formation of positive feedback loops and the role of local wisdom as a learning catalyst. These findings demonstrate the potential of integrating educational approaches within the Thai context and serve as an important prototype for developing learning models suitable for the 21st century.
References
จิตรลัดดา มะลัยทอง. (2564). การจัดการเรียนรู้แบบสะเต็มศึกษาร่วมกับการคิดเชิงออกแบบเพื่อพัฒนาสมรรถนะในการสร้างนวัตกรรม รายวิชาวิทยาศาสตร์ สำหรับนักเรียนชั้นประถมศึกษาปีที่ 5. [วิทยานิพนธ์ปริญญาศึกษาศาสตรมหาบัณฑิต]. มหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีราชมงคลธัญบุรี.
พัชรพร ศุภกิจ, และรัตนาพร หลวงแก้ว. (2564). การจัดการเรียนรู้ตามแนวคิด STAR STEMS: ประกายความหวังที่เจิดจรัส. วารสารศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยศิลปากร, 19(2), 69-87.
ภัทริยา งามมุข. (2567). ความคิดเชิงออกแบบ: วิถีไทย STAR STEMS. วารสารวไลยอลงกรณ์ปริทัศน์, 14(2), 280-292.
วงค์ณภา แก้วไกรษร, และนันทรัตน์ แก้วไกรษร. (2561). การพัฒนาความสามารถในการคิดวิเคราะห์และความคิดสร้างสรรค์. มหาวิทยาลัยบูรพา.
Australian Council for Educational Research. (2019). Creative thinking assessment. ACER Press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
d.school Stanford. (2023). Design thinking process. https://dschool.stanford.edu/
Fissore, C., Marchisio, M., & Rabellino, S. (2021). Secondary school students' creative thinking skills: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 32, 100368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100368
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444-454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
Rogers, R. J. (2023). What is design thinking, and how can it be used in classroom teaching? Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/article/design-thinking-classroom
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2016). Computational thinking for all: Pedagogical approaches to embedding 21st century problem solving in K-12 classrooms. TechTrends, 60(6), 565-568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7
Yang, K., Lin, Y. and Chen, L. (2023) Discovering Critical Factors in the Content of Crowdfunding Projects. Algorithms, 16, Article 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/a16010051
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ภัทริยา งามมุข

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวไลยอลงกรณ์ปริทัศน์ เป็นความคิดเห็นของผู้นิพนธ์แต่ละท่าน มิใช่เป็นทัศนะและมิใช่ความรับผิดชอบของกองบรรณาธิการจัดทำวารสาร และ
มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏวไลยอลงกรณ์ ในพระบรมราชูปถัมภ์