THE OPINIONS OF OFFICIALS TOWARDS PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT OF CHANNEL DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE CENTRE

Abstract

The objectives of this thematic paper were as follows:- 1) To study the opinions of officials towards personnel development of channel development and maintenance centre. 2) To compare the opinions of officials towards personnel development of channel development and maintenance centre in terms of ages, degree of educations, monthly incomes and duration of work as differently. 3) To study the suggestions were concerned with problems and resolutions the personnel development of channel development and maintenance centre. The population were officians channel development and maintenance centre, sample size by Krejcie and Morgan’s table, got the sample at the number of 108 persons, the instrument for data collection was questionnaire, both closed and open end, data analysis by instant computer program, statistical analysis by frequency, percentage, arithmetic mean, standard deviation, t-test F-test and LSD Method (Least Significant Difference).

          The results found that:-

          The opinions of officials towards personnel development of channel development and maintenance centre by overviews were at high level, identified in terms of ages, degree of educations, monthly incomes and duration of work found that by overviews were at high level, when considered in each aspect found that workshop study aspect was the highest average, and followed up further study aspect, and assignment aspect was the lowest average.

          The comparative results the opinions towards personnel development of channel development and maintenance centre of officers identified in terms of ages, degree of educations, monthly incomes and duration of work were different as statistical significance at 0.001.

The suggestions were concerned with problems and resolutions for personnel development of channel development and maintenance centre, the problems found that in some missions were not concerned with their ability, and not clear, not qualify with their duties, training was not cover, most of they usually train in term of office work, and administrative aspect, but mechanism were very lack, most of them had ability in mechanism, but they had qualify in vocational degree. The resolutions found that there should be given work according to their abilities, specialist, not regard to position, there should arrange budget for out training more, and give scholarship to mechanism personnel for bachelor of art in engineering as more as possible.