SOCRATIVE: REAL-TIME FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT TOOL ON READINESS IN FUNDAMENTAL PHYSICS LABORATORY
Keywords:
socrative, fundamental physics laboratory, readiness assessment toolAbstract
The purposes of this survey research were to study the use of Socrative as a tool for formative assessment of students’ readiness in fundamental physics laboratory and to study the students’ satisfaction of using Socrative. The target group consisted of 80 freshmen, enrolling in the Fundamental Physics laboratory in the second semester of the academic year 2021 and the first semester of the academic year 2022. The research instruments consisted multiple-choice questions on Socrative, regarding 10 laboratories. Each laboratory has 10 items scoring 100 points in total, along with satisfaction survey of the usefulness of Socrative. The statistics for data analysis were average, percentage, and standard deviation. The analytic data came from the student’s responses towards 5 aspects of questionnaires, which consisted of 1. Understand of the experiment purposes 2. Understand of the concepts that related to experiments 3. Understand of identifying the variables that must be measured and calculated 4. Understand of the tool’s specification and how to use it 5. Understand of determining and analyzing the data and the students’ responses of the satisfaction survey.
From this study was found that 1. the target group has the lowest score in the fifth aspect which is the most difficult and the highest score in the first aspect which is the easiest. 2. Students’ responses to positive attitude with the average score 4.64±0.58 and 1.81±1.15 for negative attitude. That is suggested that the students were very satisfied. This study has highlighted that Socrative serves as a suitable tool for formative assessment of students’ readiness in fundamental physics laboratory.
References
Garcia-Luque, E. et al. (2004). Using a laboratory simulator in the teaching and study of chemical processes in estuarine systems. Computers & Education. 43(1-2), 81-90.
Guarascio, A.J. et al. (2017). Evaluation of students’ perceptions of the Socrative application versus a traditional student response system and its impact on classroom engagement. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 9(5), 808-812.
Leung, A. C. K., Pour, B. H., Reynolds, D., & Stanislaw, J. (2015). New assessment process in an introductory undergraduate physics laboratory: an exploration on collaborative learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 1(13), 1-13.
Limniou, M., Papadopoulos, N., & Whitehead, C. (2009). Integration of simulation into pre-laboratory chemical course: Computer cluster versus WebCT. Computers & Education. 52(1), 45-52.
Lyle, K. S., & Robinson, W. R. (2002). An Action Research Report: Improving Pre-Laboratory Preparation of First-Year University Chemistry Students. Chemical Education Today. 76(6), 663-665.
Mazur, E., & Hilborn, R.C. (1997). Peer Instruction: A User's Manual. Physics Today. 50(4), 68-69.
Mubarok, H., Lutfiyah, A., Kholiq, A., Suprapto, N., & Putri, N. P. (2017). The performance assessment of undergraduate students in physics laboratory by using guided inquiry. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 997(012039), 1-11.
Pogacnik L., & Cigic, B. (2006). How To Motivate Students To Study before They Enter the Lab. Journal of Chemical Education. 83(7), 1094-1098.
Rollnick, M. et al. (2001). Improving pre-laboratory preparation of first year university chemistry students. International Journal of Science Education. 23(10), 1053-1071.
Sripan, T., & Sujivorakul, C. (2021). Using Engagement Activity to Enhance the Intention to Persist of Vocational Student. Vocational Education Innovation and Research Journal. 5(1), 22-31.
Winberg, T. M., & Berg, C. A. R. (2007). Students’ Cognitive Focus During a Chemistry Laboratory Exercise: Effects of a Computer-Simulated Prelab. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 44(8), 1108-1113.
Wuttiprom, S. et al. (2017). Using Plickers Cooperate with Peer Instruction to Promote Students' Discussion in Introductory Physics Course. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 5(11), 1955-1961.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 URU Journal of Integrated Sciences for Development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
แนวคิดและทัศนะในบทความเป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนบทความ การนำบทความหรือส่วนหนึ่งของบทความไปตีพิมพ์เผยแพร่ ให้อ้างอิงแสดงที่มา และข้อมูลเกี่ยวกับผู้เขียนบทความ
