THE NECESSITY OF CONTINUITY THE VILLAGE HEADMEN WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT: MULTI-CASE STUDIES IN PATHUMTHANI, CHONBURI, CHIANGMAI, SONGKHLA, RATCHABURI, AND BURIRAM PROVINCES IN THAILAND
คำสำคัญ:
Village Headmen, Provincial Administration, Municipal Governmentบทคัดย่อ
This research aims to 1) examine the necessity of maintaining the Village Headmen institution within municipal contexts in Thailand, 2) analyze variations in their roles across different levels of urbanization, and 3) propose policy recommendations for redefining Village Headmen roles in alignment with the provincial administration framework. This qualitative study uses documentary analysis, structured interviews, and focus groups. Thirty-three key informants including provincial and district officials, local executives, village headmen, community leaders, and residents were selected through purposive and snowball sampling to capture diverse governance perspectives. Data were collected in six municipalities across Thailand, representing diverse regions and urbanization levels. Interviews, focus groups, and document analysis were examined using thematic content analysis, with methodological triangulation employed to strengthen the credibility and validity of the findings. The study finds that the necessity of Village Headmen varies by urbanization level. Their roles are less essential in highly urbanized areas but remain crucial in semi-urban and rural communities for coordination, mediation, public order, and information verification. Their continued relevance requires clearer roles, stronger municipal coordination, and legal reforms supporting collaborative leadership.
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Chardchawarn, S. (2008). Decentralization under threat? Impacts of the CEO governor policy upon Thai local government. Institute of Developing Economies (IDE-JETRO).
Chardchawarn, S. (2010). Local governance in Thailand: The politics of decentralization and the roles of bureaucrats, politicians, and the people. Institute of Developing Economies (IDE-JETRO).
Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117
Department of Provincial Administration. (2024). Annual report 2024. Ministry of Interior.
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons?. Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
Kaewnanua, S., Ardwichai, W., Yanamethi, P. T., & Thinsandee, T. (2024). Decentralization and local governance: Concepts, key issues, and the future of provincial governor elections in Thailand. RATANABUTH Journal, 6(3), 643–655.
Kingdom of Thailand. (1914). Local Administration Act B.E. 2457 (1914). Government Gazette.
Kingdom of Thailand. (1953). Municipal Act B.E. 2496 (1953). Government Gazette.
Kingdom of Thailand. (2003). Municipal Act (Amendment No. 12) B.E. 2546 (2003). Government Gazette.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. Free Press.
Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.
Mutebi, A. M. (2004). Recentralising while decentralising: Centre–local relations and “CEO” governors in Thailand. The Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 26(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2004.10779284
Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance?. Public Management Review, 8(3), 377-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022
Phonsungnoen, P., & Lowatcharin, G. (2024). Cross-sector collaboration among local governments in Thailand in response to COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research in Asia, 30(1), 91–104.
Rondinelli, D. A. (1981). Government decentralization in comparative perspective: Theory and practice in developing countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 47(2), 133–145.
ดาวน์โหลด
เผยแพร่แล้ว
รูปแบบการอ้างอิง
ฉบับ
ประเภทบทความ
สัญญาอนุญาต
ลิขสิทธิ์ (c) 2026 Suwida Nuamcharoen, Pitchaya Javakorn, Kanjana Boonyoung, Akarawin Sasanapitak

อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของ ผู้เขียน
ทัศนะและความคิดเห็นที่ปรากฏในบทความในวารสารเครือข่ายส่งเสริมการวิจัยทางมนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์จะถือเป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนบทความนั้น และไม่ถือเป็นทัศนะและความรับผิดชอบของกองบรรณาธิการ

