THE DIGITAL CITIZENSHIP PARADOX: EXAMINING DEMOCRATIC EMPOWERMENT AND EROSION IN HYBRID MEDIA ECOSYSTEMS

ผู้แต่ง

คำสำคัญ:

Political Culture, Digital Citizenship, Hybrid Media Ecosystem, Affective Polarization, Platform Affordances, Dark Social

บทคัดย่อ

This article critically examines the profound transformation of political culture, moving beyond traditional civic paradigms to reveal the paradoxes inherent in “digital citizenship.” Using a critical interpretive synthesis to analyze the dualistic nature of the contemporary hybrid media ecosystem, the study explores how digital platforms both enable democratic empowerment and intensify severe affective polarization. Platform affordances – particularly algorithmic curation and anonymity – are shown not as neutral tools, but as active agents shaping a new participatory culture that relies heavily on meme and hashtag activism. The analysis also highlights the significant influence of the invisible digital stratum, showing how “dark social” networks and state-sponsored information operations covertly manipulate political narratives and foster insulated ideological enclaves. The research demonstrates that the blurring of boundaries between online spaces and offline mobilization creates a volatile environment where generational “digital tribalism” thrives and emotionality increasingly overshadows classical rationality in political decision-making. While recognizing the potential for transnational connective action, the paper rigorously addresses severe methodological and ethical limitations in current research. It specifically warns against representation bias and the critical shortcomings of big-data analytics in interpreting nuanced human sentiment. Ultimately, this study calls for a de-westernized research agenda, advocating for deep ethnographies of covert digital spaces to fully understand the deeply intertwined and increasingly polarized realities of modern political life.

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Adooh, T., & Onuegbu, F. (2023). Social Media and Social Change. A Study of the Arab Spring and Spanish Indignados. International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Research, 9(9), 206-216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56201/ijssmr.v9.no9.2023.pg206.216

AlAfnan, M. (2025). The Role of Memes in Shaping Political Discourse on Social Media. Studies in Media and Communication, 13(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v13i2.7482

Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton University Press.

Almotairy, B., Abdullah, M., & Alahmadi, D. (2024). Characterizing Arabic Computational Propaganda on Twitter. Computación y Sistemas, 28(3), 1633-1653. https://doi.org/10.13053/CyS-28-3-5168

Anderau, D., & Barbarrusa, D. (2024). The Function of Memes in Political Discourse. Topoi, 43, 1529-1546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10112-0

Badr, H. (2021). Before the ‘Arab Spring’: How challengers pushed counter-issues in Egypt’s hybrid media system. Media, War & Conflict, 14(4), 522–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635219894611

Bennett, W., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661

Bennett, W., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge University Press.

Bor, A., & Petersen, M. (2022). The Psychology of Online Political Hostility: A Comprehensive, Cross-National Test of the Mismatch Hypothesis. American Political Science Review, 116(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000885

Borge-Holthoefer, J., Magdy, W., Darwish, K., & Weber, I. (2015). Content and Network Dynamics Behind Egyptian Political Polarization on Twitter. In CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 700-711). Vancouver, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675163

Boulianne, S. (2023). Participatory Inequality Across Countries: Contacting Public Officials Online and Offline. Social Science Computer Review, 41(4), 1336-1362. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211071067

Bright, J., Marchal, N., Ganesh, B., & Rudinac, S. (2020). Echo Chambers Exist! (But They're Full of Opposing Views). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.11461

Chadwick, A. (2013). The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford University Press.

Chan, M., & Yi, J. (2024). Social Media Use and Political Engagement in Polarized Times. Examining the Contextual Roles of Issue and Affective Polarization in Developed Democracies. Political Communication, 41(5), 743-762. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2325423

Chanchaipitiphat, N., Namdet, R., Archapiraj, A., & Wongmahesak, K. (2025). The Evolving Online Public Sphere: Reimagining Political Participation in the Digital Age. Asian Political Science Review, 9(2), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.14456/apsr.2025.14

Chen, Z., Yu, W., Sun, Y., Wang, C., & Liu, X. (2025). The dark side of the Internet: Fueling misinformation in the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 US Presidential Election. Communication and the Public, 11(2), 160-181. https://doi.org/10.1177/20570473251323752

Chiovaro, M., Windsor, L., Windsor, A., & Paxton, A. (2021). Online social cohesion reflects real-world group action in Syria during the Arab Spring. PLoS ONE, 16(7), e0254087. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254087

Chua, L. (2018). Small acts and personal politics: On helping to save the orangutan via social media. Anthropology Today, 34(3), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12432

Cortesi, S., Hasse, A., Lombana-Bermudez, A., Kim, S., & Gasser, U. (2020). Youth and digital citizenship+ (plus): Understanding skills for a digital world. Massachusetts: Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3557518

De Marco, S., Robles, J., & Antino, M. (2014). Digital skills as a conditioning factor for digital political participation. Communications, 39(1), 43-65.

De Vreese, C., & Tromble, R. (2023). The Data Abyss: How Lack of Data Access Leaves Research and Society in the Dark. Political Communication, 40(3), 356-360.

Eady, G., Nagler, J., Guess, A., Zilinsky, J., & Tucker, J. (2019). How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter Data. Sage Open, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019832705

Frey, V., Baldassarri, D., & Billari, F. (2024). Bridging the Digital Divide Narrows the Participation Gap: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment. Sociological Science, 11, 214-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.15195/v11.a9

Gellwitzki, C. N. L., & Houde, A.-M. (2022). Feeling the Heat: Emotions, Politicization, and the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(5), 1470-1487. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13328

Goldstein, J., Chao, J., Grossman, S., Stamos, A., & Tomz, M. (2024). How persuasive is AI-generated propaganda?. PNAS Nexus, 3(2), pgae034. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae034

González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., & Moreno, Y. (2013). Broadcasters and Hidden Influentials in Online Protest Diffusion. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 943-965. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479371

González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., Rivero, A., & Moreno, Y. (2011). The Dynamics of Protest Recruitment through an Online Network. Scientific Reports, 1, 197. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00197

Guess, A. (2021). (Almost) Everything in Moderation: New Evidence on Americans' Online Media Diets. American Journal of Political Science, 65(4), 1007-1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12589

Hakimi, I., Tayeb, A., Rusli, N., & Ibrahim, M. (2025). Digital Technologies and Youth Democracy: A Narrative Review of Civic Participation, Digital Citizenship and Emerging Challenges. Information Management and Business Review, 17(4(I), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v17i4(I).4716

Hale, S., John, P., Margetts, H., & Yasseri, T. (2018). How digital design shapes political participation: A natural experiment with social information. PLoS One, 13(4), e0196068. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196068

Hang, T. (2021). Forming Political Culture in the Context of Industrial Revolution 4.0. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovations, 9(4), 66-70.

Heeks, R. (2022). Digital inequality beyond the digital divide: Conceptualizing adverse digital incorporation in the global South. Information Technology for Development, 28(4), 688-704. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2022.2068492

Hopp, T., Vargo, C., Dixon, L., & Thain, N. (2018). Correlating Self-Report and Trace Data Measures of Incivility: A Proof of Concept. Social Science Computer Review, 38(5), 584-599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318814241

Humprecht, E., Amsler, M., Esser, F., & Aelst, P. (2024). Emotionalized Social Media Environments: How Alternative News Media and Populist Actors Drive Angry Reactions. Political Communication, 41(4), 559-587. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2350416

Jenkins, H., & Jie, Y. (2024). The path from participatory culture to participatory politics: A critical investigation—An interview with Henry Jenkins. Communication and the Public, 9(1), 11-30.

Jiang, J., Ren, X., & Ferrara, E. (2021). Social Media Polarization and Echo Chambers in the Context of COVID-19: Case Study. JMIRx Med, 2(3), e29570. https://doi.org/10.2196/29570

Jost, P., Heft, A., Buehling, K., Zehring, M., Schulze, H., Bitzmann, H., & Domahidi, E. (2023). Mapping a Dark Space: Challenges in Sampling and Classifying Non- Institutionalized Actors on Telegram. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 71(3–4), 212-229. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2023-3-4-212

Joynes, J., & Vijay Kumar, V. (2024). Emotions, media, and mobilization: a comparative analysis of social movements through the lens of affect and activism. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 19(3), 244-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2025.2523267

Kantaros, N., Suksawas, W., & Phisamacharayothin, P. (2025). Factors Affecting the Political Culture of First-Time Voters in the General Election of 2023 A.D. in Upper North of Thailand. Community and Social Development Journal, 26(2), 180-197. https://doi.org/10.57260/csdj.2025.278492

Klinger, U., Koc-Michalska, K., & Russmann, U. (2023). Are Campaigns Getting Uglier, and Who Is to Blame? Negativity, Dramatization and Populism on Facebook in the 2014 and 2019 EP Election Campaigns. Political Communication, 40(3), 263-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2133198

Kozinets, R., & Jenkins, H. (2021). Consumer movements, brand activism, and the participatory politics of media: A conversation. Journal of Consumer Culture, 22(1), 264-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/14695405211013993

Kreutz, J., & Makrogianni, A. (2024). Online repression and transnational social movements: Thailand and the #MilkTeaAlliance. Political Research Exchange, 6(1), 2299120. https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2023.2299120

Lee, S., Diehl, T., & Valenzuela, S. (2022). Rethinking the Virtuous Circle Hypothesis on Social Media: Subjective versus Objective Knowledge and Political Participation. Human Communication Research, 48(1), 57-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqab014

Lybeck, R., Koiranen, I. & Koivula, A. (2024). From digital divide to digital capital: The role of education and digital skills in social media participation. Universal Access in the Information Society, 23, 1657-1669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00961-0

Martinez, G., & Tenev, N. (2025). Optimal Echo Chambers. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.01249

Meesuwan, S. (2016). The Effect of Internet Use on Political Participation: Could the Internet Increase Political Participation in Thailand?. International Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 12(2), 57-82.

Mielczarek, N. (2018). The dead Syrian refugee boy goes viral: funerary Aylan Kurdi memes as tools of mourning and visual reparation in remix culture. Visual Communication, 19(4), 506-530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218797366

Mina, A. (2014). Batman, Pandaman and the Blind Man: A Case Study in Social Change Memes and Internet Censorship in China. Journal of Visual Culture, 13(3), 359-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412914546576

Mosleh, M., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. (2021). Field Experiments on Social Media. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(1), 69-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211054761

Moss, J., Robinson, E., & Watts, J. (2020). Brexit and the Everyday Politics of Emotion: Methodological Lessons from History. Political Studies, 68(4), 837-856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720911915

Muhajir, Latief, A., & Tiara, M. (2025). Strengthening digital literacy and political culture for Gen Z through Pancasila education learning in higher education. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 22(2), 524-534. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v22i2.89956

Nettasinghe, B., Percus, A., & Lerman, K. (2025). How out-group animosity can shape partisan divisions: A model of affective polarization. PNAS Nexus, 4(3), pgaf082. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf082

Nguyen, C. (2020). Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles. Episteme, 17(2), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.32

Nieubuurt, J. T. (2021). Internet Memes: Leaflet Propaganda of the Digital Age. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 547065. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.547065

Noël, X., Jaafari, N., & Bechara, A. (2019). A Somatic Marker Perspective of Political Decision Making. In Erin Hannah (ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.945

Nyhan, B., Settle, J., Thorson, E., Wojcieszak, M., Barberá, P., Chen, A., … & Tucker, J. (2023). Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing. Nature, 620, 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06297-w

Overgaard, C. (2024). Perceiving Affective Polarization in the United States: How Social Media Shape Meta-Perceptions and Affective Polarization. Social Media + Society, 10(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241232662

Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin.

Phattharathanasut, T. (2024). From Bad Student to Transnational Activist: Netiwit Chotiphatphaisal and Transnational Activism in Northeast and Southeast Asia. TRaNS: Trans -Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 12, 129-144.

Piccardi, T., Saveski, M., Jia, C., Hancock, J., Tsai, J., & Bernstein, M. (2025). Reranking partisan animosity in algorithmic social media feeds alters affective polarization. Science, 390(6776), eadu5584. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adu5584

Rastogi, S., & Kashyap, S. (2019). Political Memes and Perceptions: A Study of Memes as a Political Communication Tool in the Indian Context. Proceedings of the 5th World Conference on Media and Mass Communication, 5(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.17501/24246778.2019.5104

Reynaldi, H. A., Dhiyaa, C. G., & Imawan, R. (2023). Digital advocacy phenomenon in ASEAN (Case Study: The Milk Tea Alliance social movement in Thailand and Myanmar). International Relations on Indonesian Foreign Policy Conference 2022. NST Proceedings. 12-21. https://doi.org/10.11594/nstp.2023.3403

Rovira, M. P. (2020). Digital Political Participation and the Digital Divide: Insights from the Cambodia Case. Malaysian Journal of International Relations, 8, 66-86. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjir.vol8no1.5

Salzman, R. (2015). Exploring Social Media Use and Protest Participation in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Communication Research, 5(2), 72-85.

Sarsfield, R., & Abuchanab, Z. (2024). Populist Storytelling and Negative Affective Polarization: Social Media Evidence from Mexico. Latin American Politics and Society, 66(Special Issue 2), 102-131. https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2024.7

Schaffar, W. (2021). “I Am not Here for Fun”: The Satirical Facebook Group Royalists Marketplace, Queer TikToking, and the New Democracy Movement in Thailand: An Interview with Pavin Chachavalpongpun. Advances in Southeast Asian Studies, 14(1), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-0039

Shoukat, D., & Jokhiyo, F. (2025). Memes as Tools of Resistance, Distraction, and Tribalism: A Sociological Analysis of Digital Culture in Pakistan. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(2), 1533-1541. https://doi.org/10.59075/nnjmxd90

Sunstein, C. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton University Press.

Swed, O., Dassanayaka, S., & Volchenkov, D. (2024). Keeping it authentic: The social footprint of the trolls’ network. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 14, 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-023-01161-1

Törnberg, P., & Törnberg, A. (2024). Inside a White Power echo chamber: Why fringe digital spaces are polarizing politics. New Media & Society, 26(8), 4511-4533. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221122915

Tran, M., Phattharathanasut, T., Nyunt, H., Ekapong, N., & Young, L. (2025). Pro-democracy platform advocacy: Resisting Big Tech-mediated authoritarianism in Southeast Asia. Open Research Europe, 5, 10. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.18820.2

Trigiani, A., & Boler, M. (2021). Discourses of Victimhood and Identity Politics on Social Media: Understanding Affective Polarization During the US Election. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2021i0.12254

Ulfa, N., & Prianti, D. (2025). Politics of Participatory Culture: Indonesian NCTzen and WayZenNi Transforming Fandom for #SM_BOYCOTT_GENOCIDE. Alphabet, 8(1), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.alphabet.2025.08.01.02

Verweij, M., Senior, T., Domínguez, D., JF., & Turner, R. (2015). Emotion, rationality, and decision-making: How to link affective and social neuroscience with social theory. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, 332. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00332

Wack, M., Ehrett, C., Linvill, D., & Warren, P. (2025). Generative propaganda: Evidence of AI’s impact from a state-backed disinformation campaign. PNAS Nexus, 4(4), pgaf083. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf083

Wongmahesak, K., Rotjanawasuthorn, S., Wekke, I., & Wakano, A. (2025). Political Socialization in the Age of AI: Implications for Democratization and De-Democratization. Humanities and Social Science Research Promotion Network Journal, 8(2), 1-31.

Zhu, Q., Esteve-Del-Valle, M., & Meyer, J. (2024). Safe spaces? Grounding political talk in WhatsApp groups. New Media & Society, 26(9), 5423–5444. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221136080

Zollo, F., Bessi, A., Vicario, M., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Shekhtman, L., Havlin, S., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2017). Debunking in a world of tribes. PLoS ONE, 12(7), e0181821. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181821

ดาวน์โหลด

เผยแพร่แล้ว

2026-06-25

รูปแบบการอ้างอิง

Wongmahesak, K., & Sriyakul, T. (2026). THE DIGITAL CITIZENSHIP PARADOX: EXAMINING DEMOCRATIC EMPOWERMENT AND EROSION IN HYBRID MEDIA ECOSYSTEMS. วารสารเครือข่ายส่งเสริมการวิจัยทางมนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์, 9(2), 141–164. สืบค้น จาก https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hsrnj/article/view/291737

ฉบับ

ประเภทบทความ

บทความวิจัย