PUBLIC POLICY WITH DELIMITATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AREA OF THAILAND
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This academic article aims to demonstrate the relations between public policy and delimitation of environmental protection area in Thailand. It is a policy to conserve natural resources and the environment for reducing pollution of country and reducing greenhouse effect of the earth at present. Delimitation of environmental protection area policy in Thailand was implemented to ten areas. Delimitation of environmental protection area of Thailand was done by issuing ministerial regulations to enforcement for people and the government agency in that area, Then the government agency has to restrict some rights for people who live in the delimitation of environmental protection area to make that policy achieves the objective for conserving natural resources and the environment.
Before formulating
the policy, the government agency must allow people in that area to participate in the policy formulation and to acknowledge basic information and people’s needs in that area. In order to decrease the impact to people in that area, before the implementation based on the concept of New Public Service (NPS). When people were restricted some rights for the people in the delimitation of environmental protection area, the government agency has to remedy the affected people in order to kind the consensus in policy formulation. As a result, the delimitation of environmental protection area policy in Thailand will be put into practice.
Article Details
References
ทัศนา พิทักษ์สุธีพงษ์. (2555). อนุสัญญาสหประชาชาติว่าด้วยความหลากหลายทางชีวภาพ. ในรายงานการสัมมนาหัวข้อ การใช้ทรัพยากรจากความหลากหลายทางชีวภาพ. พิษณุโลก: มหาวิทยาลัยนเรศวร.
สมบัติ ธำรงธัญวงศ์. (2549). นโยบายสาธารณะ: แนวคิดการวิเคราะห์และกระบวนการ.พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 6. กรุงเทพฯ: สถาบันบัณฑิตพัฒนบริหารศาสตร์.
สำนักนโยบายและแผนทรัพยากรธรรมชาติและสิ่งแวดล้อม. (2558). แผนแม่บทการจัดการความหลากหลายทางชีวภาพแบบบูรณาการ พ.ศ.2558-2564. กรุงเทพฯ: กระทรวงทรัพยากรธรรมชาติและสิ่งแวดล้อม.
อัจฉรา รักยุติธรรม. (2548). นโยบายสาธารณะที่พึงปรารถนา. กรุงเทพฯ: กรุงเทพธุรกิจ.
Anderson, J. E. (1975). Public Policy Making. New York: Holt.
Considine, M. (1994). Public Policy: A Critical Approach. South Melbourne, Australia: Mac Millan.
Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2007). The New Public Service: Serving Not Streering. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Dye, T. R. (1984). Understanding Public Policy. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Easton, D. (1953). The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York: Alfred A. Knorf.
Friedrich, C. J. (1963). Man and His Government. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Havanond, S. (1997). Mangrove Forest Conservation in Thailand. Biol. Bull. NTNU., 32(2), 97-102.
International Centre for Environmental Management. (2003). Thailand National Report on Protected Areas and Development. Queensland, Australia: ICEM.
Prewitt, K., & Verba, S. (1983). An Introduction to American Government. 4th ed. New York: HarperCollins.
Sharkansky, I. (1970). The Policy Scientist and Policy Analysis. In I. Sharkansky (Ed.), Policy Analysis in Policy Science (pp. 15). Chicago, Illinois: Markham Publishing.
The International Union for Conservation of Nature. (2006). Environmental and Socio Economic Value of Mangroves in Tsunami Affected Areas: Rapid ecological-economic-livelihood assessment of Ban Naca and Ban Bangman in Ranong Province, Thailand. Switzerland: IUCN.
The United States Agency for International Development. (2015). Valuing Ecosystem Services in the Lower Mekong Basin: Country Report for Thailand. USA: USAID.
World Bank. (2017). Atlas of Sustainable Development Goals 2017: From World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Health Organization. (2015). Health and climate change: country profile 2015: Thailand. Switzerland: WHO.
