THE EFFECTS OF TASK REPETITION ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF PRAGMATIC COMPETENCE OF THAI EFL UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study revealed the results of the effects of task repetition towards the development of pragmatic competence of Thai EFL university students. The study was conducted with 101 English majors who were grouped into three instructional groups: identical task repetition (IR), task type repetition (TR), and traditional class. The two treatment groups (IR and TR) were given a pretest, six treatment tasks on pragmatic speech act of complaint, an attitude questionnaire, and a posttest. Meanwhile, the traditional class group were given a pretest, a traditional teaching method of one task, and a posttest after class. During the treatment, the IR group engaged in six tasks with the same content and the same procedure while the TR group performed six tasks with the same procedure but different content each time. Learners from both treatment groups received the tasks twice a week, and a questionnaire and a posttest after all six treatments. The results revealed that both the treatment groups showed significant development on pragmatic competence with a priori set at 0.05 and had positive attitudes towards task repetition.
Article Details
References
Ahmadi, H., & Ghaemi, F. (2017). Effects of Task Repetition and EFL Proficiency on English Speech Act Production. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 8(1), 179-193.
Ahmadian, M. J. (2011). The effect of ‘Massed’ Task Repetitions on Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency: Does It Transfer to a New Task?. The Language Learning Journal, 39(3), 269–280.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baleghizadeh, S., & Derakhshesh, A. (2012). The Effect of Task Repetition and Noticing on EFL Learners' Oral Output. International Journal of Instruction, 5(1), 141-152.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bygate, M. (1996). Effects of Task Repetition: Appraising the Developing Language of Learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and Change in Language Teaching (pp. 136-146). Oxford: Heinemann.
Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of Task Repetition on the Structure and Control of Oral Language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23-48). Harlow: Longman.
Bygate, M., & Samuda, V. (2005). Integrative Planning through the Use of Task Repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language (pp. 37-74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2005a). Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ellis, R. (2005b). Planning and Task-based Performance: Theory and Research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language (pp. 3-36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hawkes, M. (2011). Using Task Repetition to Direct Learner Attention and Focus on Form. ELT Journal, 66, 327-336.
Inprasit. C. (2016). Thai Native Teachers’ Experiences of Using Communicative Language Teaching in Extended Education Schools. Master Thesis in Teaching English as Foreign Language, Thammasat University.
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2000). Exploring the Benefits of Task Repetition and Recycling for Classroom Language Learning. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 221-250.
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2001). A Case of Exercising: Effects of Immediate Task Repetition on Learners’ Performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.141–162). Boston: Addison Wesley Longman.
Morris, K. J. (2017). Learning by Doing: The Affordances of Task-Based Pragmatics Instruction for Beginning L2 Spanish Learners Studying Abroad. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California.
Moser, J. (2012). A Classroom Based, Mixed Methods Study into the Influence of Transcribing, Reporting, and Task Repetition: How do they impact in-class student spoken task performances. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Birmingham.
Nakhle, M., Naghavi, M., & Razavi, A. (2014). Complaint Behaviors among Native Speakers of Canadian English, Iranian EFL Learners, and Native Speakers of Persian (Contrastive Pragmatic Study). Social and Behavioral sciences, 98, 1316-1324.
Patanasorn, C. (2010). Effect of Procedural Content and Task Repetition on Accuracy and Fluency in an EFL Context. Ph.D. Dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
Pinto, D. (2002). Perdóname, ¿llevasmuchoesperando? Conventionalized Language in L1 English and L2 Spanish. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Spanish, University of California.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taguchi, N. (2009). Pragmatic Competence (Mouton Series in Pragmatics). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Takimoto, M. (2012). Assessing the Effects of Identical Task Repetition and Task Type Repetition on Learners' Recognition and Production of Second Language Request Downgraders. Intercultural Pragmatics, 9(1), 71-96.
Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.