Enhancing Creative Thinking among 3rd Year Students through Project-based Learning Integrated with Deconstruction Method in 3D Animation Course
Main Article Content
Abstract
3D Animation Course requires expertise in computer graphics skills and design creativity. From the studentsí portfolios, it was found that they did not demonstrate adequate design process and critical thinking, and there was a lack of repeated experimentation. These issues affect negatively becoming good designers in the future. This study aimed to develop studentsí creativity by project-based learning integrated with the deconstruction method. The learning focused on performing one 3D playground modeling project per student group. The study implemented a quasi-experimental design, using the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking (TTCT) to measure the studentsí creativity before and after the intervention. The instructional activities comprised four key steps: surveying, creating, deconstructing, and reconstructing. The findings revealed statistically significant improvements in three creativity domains, namely originality, elaboration, and resistance to premature closure. Moreover, the relationships between creativity components shifted positively after the intervention, highlighting the synergistic impact of deconstruction method. This study demonstrates the potential of integrating deconstruction method into creative learning environments.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The contents and data in published articles in the Journal of Education and Innovative Learning are considered the ideas and responsibility of the author(s). The Editorial team does not necessarily agree with any ideas or hold mutual responsibility of them. Plagiarism is not permitted, even for academic purposes. However, proper citation must be given whenever referencing the articles.
References
Alsaqer, B. N. A. (2023). The role of deconstructing as a part of translation process in literary text. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 20(02), 960-968. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.20.2.2335
Aprilia, F., Neisya, & Mutmainnah. (2025). Beyond chains: Re-examining identity and resilience in “12 Years A Slave” for SDGs in education and social justice. Journal of Lifestyle & SDG’s Review, 5(1), e03354. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n01.pe03354
Bernabeu, M., Moreno, M., & Llinares, S. (2024). Polygon class learning opportunities: Interplay between teacher's moves, children's geometrical thinking, and geometrical task. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22, 1381-1403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10425-3
Dureh, N. (2021). The project-based learning and growth score for statistical modeling subject. Journal of Education Khon Kaen University, 44(1), 65-76. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/EDKKUJ/article/view/245191 [in Thai]
Durmus, S., & Gur, S. O. (2011). Methodology of deconstruction in architectural education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1586-1594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.335
Echeverri, D. (2015). Deconstruction as a structured ideation tool for designers. Learn X Design, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Design Education Researchers, 2, 870-881. https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1043&context=conference-volumes
Fitri, R., Lufri, L., Alberida, H., Amran, A., & Fachry, R. (2024). The project-based learning model and its contribution to student creativity: A review. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 10(1), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i1.31499
Ghazy, M. F., & Tohjiwa, A. D. (2022). Deconstruction concept design of exhibition center in Depok City with disjunction interpretation. DIMENSI: Journal of Architecture and Built Environment, 49(2), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.49.2.123-132
Gula, I., Maznichenko, O., Kutsenko, A., Osadcha, A., & Kravchenko, N. (2023). Methods of teaching graphic design in HEIs for art [Special issue]. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 12(2), 154-165. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v12n2p154
Hansen, S. M. (2017). Deconstruction/Reconstruction: A pedagogic method for teaching programming to graphic designers. In 20th Generative Art Conference (GA2017), 1–11. https://generativeart.com/GA2017/Stig_deconstructionReconstruction_stigMollerHansen.pdf
Hegzi, Y. S., & Abdel-Fatah, N. A. (2018). Quantifying students' perception for deconstruction architecture. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 9(4), 2745-2754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2017.09.006
Hong, D., & Hwang, M. (2006). The status and the prospects of deconstruction in graphic design. In K. Friedman, T. Love, E. Côrte-Real, & C. Rust (Eds.). Wonderground - DRS International Conference2006. Design Research Society. https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers/drs2006/researchpapers/107
Hoteit, A. (2015). Deconstructivism: Translation from philosophy to architecture. Canada Social Science, 11(7), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.3968/7240
Injun, P., & Sirichaisin, K. (2021). The development of a curriculum to enhance future problems solving to prepare for an earthquake disaster using a teaching model on the Torrance concept for upper primary school students. Journal of MCU Social Science Review, 10(2), 292-307. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jssr/article/view/252084 [in Thai]
Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology. (2024, July 17). Creativity assessment of Pisa 2022. https://pisathailand.ipst.ac.th/news-22 [in Thai]
Khakzand, M., & Rakhshani, Z. (2021). Deconstruction as a technique for divergent thinking in pedagogy of the academic design process. Journal of Design Thinking, 2(2), 263-276. https://doi.org/10.22059/JDT.2022.339679.1070
Mekkhachorn, N. (2004). Accuracy reliability and norms of torrance creativities testing in thai issue and the report for consultants testing [Doctoral dissertation, Srinakharinwirot University]. http://thesis.swu.ac.th/swudis/Coun_Psy/Nitipat_M.pdf [in Thai]
Ningsih, S. R., Disman, Ahman, E., Suwatno, & Riswanto, A. (2020). Effectiveness of using the project-based learning model in improving creative-thinking ability. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1628-1635. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080456
Ouppaphan, K. (2021). Torrance's future problem-solving instructional model to enhance creativity in Mahidol Wittayanusorn School [Classroom research, Mahidol Wittatanusorn school]. http://backoffice.thaiedresearch.org/uploads/paper/43acbe3d8da5cf5b06206e09afb1a26c.pdf [in Thai]
Peng, J., Wang, M., Sampson, D., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2019). Using a visualisation-based and progressive learning environment as a cognitive tool for learning computer programming. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 52-68. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4676
Phanmanee, A. (2014). Creative thinking in practice. ChulaPress. [in Thai]
Pirasorn, A., & Kaewsufong, S. (2019). Jacques Derrida’s concept of différance. Panidhana Journal, 15(1), 33-56. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/panidhana/article/view/188053 [in Thai]
Pornrongroj, C. (2003). Creative thinking. ChulaPress. [in Thai]
Prapasanobol, V., & Nillapun, M. (2021). Project-based learning management according to the constructionism theory. Journal of Research and Curriculum Development, 11(2), 8-23. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jrcd/article/view/242560 [in Thai]
Sari, E. D. P., Trisnawati, R. K., Agustina, M. F., & Adiarti, D. (2023). Assessment of students’ creative thinking skill on the implementation of project-based learning. International Journal of Language Education, 7(3), 414-428. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v7i3.38462
Suwannatip, R., & Saelee, S. (2023). Systematic review of the literature on project based learning in educational institutions. Journal of the Greater Mekhong Subregion Research and Development, 2(3), 48-59. https://so14.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/RDGMSJournal/article/view/317 [in Thai]
Wongkumsin, T., & Singhwee, C. (2020). Project-based learning for development self-directed learning. Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 46(1), 218-253. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/socku/article/view/241841 [in Thai]
Zborowska, A. (2015). Deconstruction in contemporary fashion design: Analysis and critique. International Journal of Fashion Studies, 2(2), 185-201. https://doi.org/10.1386/infs.2.2.185_1