An Application of Philosophical Concepts to the Design of Spirit Houses within the Context of Digital Lifestyles

Main Article Content

Tanakan Bangnoi
Rueanglada Punyalikhit

Abstract

This article aims to: 1) examine the transformation of ritual beliefs and values associated with spirit houses in order to align them with the conditions of contemporary digital life; 2) develop an integrated four-dimensional applied philosophical framework—encompassing socio-cultural, religious, media, and epistemological domains—for the design of spirit houses in the digital era; and 3) assess the effectiveness of a modular spirit house model combined with an augmented reality (AR) system in mediating cultural expressions and addressing spatial constraints in modern residential environments. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, combining Design-Based Research (DBR) with Purposive Sampling to select participants who fit specific cultural and demographic criteria. Data collection instruments include structured questionnaires, in-depth interviews, and AR-based behavioral observation. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean, percentage) and thematic analysis, allowing for both quantitative insight and qualitative depth. The findings reveal that 85% of participants reported an increased recognition of ritual significance and cultural dimensions after engaging with the prototype, while 78% perceived the modular design as an effective solution to spatial limitations inherent in contemporary urban living. Based on these outcomes, the study proposes two key conceptual contributions: the Contemporary Sacred Space Model and the AR-Enabled Rituals Protocol. These models demonstrate the viability of spirit houses as contemporary sacred sites, functioning meaningfully in both symbolic and practical terms within Thailand’s evolving digital society.

Article Details

Section
Research Article

References

อมร ทองสุก. (2566). การเปลี่ยนผ่านของพิธีกรรมในพื้นที่เมือง: ศรัทธา สื่อ และสภาวะร่วมสมัย. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์วิถีไทย.

ธนาคาร บางน้อย. (2025). รูปลักษณ์ของมิติความเชื่อทางพื้นที่ที่มีอิทธิพลต่อวิถีชีวิต. กรุงเทพฯ: คณะมัณฑนศิลป์ มหาวิทยาลัยศิลปากร.

ศรีศักร วัลลิโภดม. (2560). พุทธศาสนาและความเชื่อในสังคมไทย. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 2. กรุงเทพมหานคร :

มูลนิธิเล็ก-ประไพ วิริยะพันธุ์.

Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.

Jackson, P. A. (1999). Markets, media, and magic: Re-enchantment in Thai cultural flows. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.

James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.

Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern (C. Porter, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Pew Research Center. (2020). Global religiosity and assuredness survey. สืบค้นเมื่อวันที่ 20 มกราคม 2568, จาก https://www.pewresearch.org

Sukhoverkhov, A., Klimenko, A. A., & Tkachenko, A. S. (2021). Daoist philosophy and martial arts performance: A conceptual review. Journal of Philosophy of Sport, 48(2), 235–246.