Objects, Humans, and Spirits Coexist Through People's Sensory Experiences Along the Mekong River

Main Article Content

Chanang Umparak

Abstract

            This article reviews conceptual frameworks with preliminary field data to study ecology and sensory ideas. It integrates Arturo Escobar’s pluriverse framework and Timothy Ingold’s material ecology. Mekong  River conservation areas are examined from the viewpoint of Ingold’s non - anthropocentric  approach to environmental studies to analyze material culture and ecological  anthropology. Following the actor - network theory (ANT), how Mekong River communities in Ban Samrong, Pho Sai District, and Ban Ta Mui, Khong Chiam District, Ubon Ratchathani Province develop concepts and practices to coexist with their environment is studied. Results are that each site has unique experiences, perspectives, and understandings of the physical and intangible worlds as a pluriverse. This shift in focus from human - centered to broader ecological interactions  suggests that traditional study methods are inadequate.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Büscher, B. & Fletcher, R. (2020). The conservation revolution: radical ideas for saving nature beyond the anthropocene. London: Verso Books.

Chua, L. & Salmond, A. (2012). Artefacts in anthropology. In Fardon, R. et. al. The Sage handbook of social anthropology (Vol. 2). London: SAGE Publication., Ltd.

De la Cadena, M. & Blaser, M. (Eds.). (2018). A world of many worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.

Escobar, A. (2020). Pluriversal politics: The real and the possible. Durham: Duke University Press.

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. London: Psychology Press.

Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Southampton: The Camelot Press.

Heidegger, M. (1971). Building dwelling thinking. In A. Hofstadter (Trans.), Poetry, language, thought (141 - 159). New York: Harper & Row.

Ingold, T. (1993). The temporality of the landscape. World archaeology, 25(2), 152 - 174.

Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.

Ingold, T. (2012). Toward an ecology of materials. Annual review of anthropology, 41, 427 - 442.

Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. London: Routledge.

Ingold, T. (2018). Anthropology: Why it matters. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Kiik, L. (2018, July). Wild - ing the ethnography of conservation: Writing nature’s value and agency. In Anthropological Forum (Vol. 28, No. 3, 217 - 235). London: Routledge.

Latour B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor - Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Latour, B. (2012). We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University press.

Merleau - Ponty, M. & Smith, C. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (Vol. 26). London: Routledge.

Olsen, B. (2010). In defense of things: archaeology and the ontology of objects. Lanham: Rowman Altamira.

Saipan, P. (1996). นาคาคติ อีสานลุ่มน้ำโขง ชีวิตทางวัฒนธรรมจากพิธีกรรมร่วมสมัย [Nakakatti of Mekong - Isan: Cultural Lives through Contemporary Ritual Practice]. Bangkok: Thammasat University.

Schiffer, M. B. (1999). Behavioral archaeology: some clarifications. American Antiquity, 64(1), 166 - 168.

Serres, M. (1974). Hermès III: La traduction. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.

Tsing, A. L. (2004). Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Vaddhanaphuti, C. (2022). Conservation in the Age of Anthropocene: Past, Present and Future. Bangkok: Heinrich - Böll - Stiftung Southeast Asia.

Interviewee

Sawai. (2023, October 25). Riverside villager, Baan Samrong, Pho Sai District, Ubon Ratchathani Province.