Guidelines for Teacher Collaboration Network Development to Promote Information Literacy Skills of Secondary Students
Keywords:
Guidelines, Collaboration network, Skill promotion, Information literacy, Secondary studentsAbstract
Abstract
The purposes of the research on Guidelines for Teacher Collaboration Network Development to Promote Information Literacy Skills of Secondary Students were 1) to study current teacher collaboration conditions to promote information literacy skills of secondary students, 2) to study factors causing teacher collaboration network to promote information literacy skills of secondary students, and 3) to study for guidelines for teacher. The research was implemented by using quantitative and qualitative research methods. The samples in this study were teachers working in 85 Schools under the supervision of the Secondary Educational Service Area Office 33, Surin Province. Statistics applied for data analysis were standard deviation, percentage, and mean. Research results were revealed as follows:
1) The mean of current teacher collaboration conditions to promote information literacy of secondary students was at the “most” level (mean = 4.55, SD = 0.60). Considering in terms of each aspect, it was found that the mean of teachers’ attitudes towards collaboration was at the “most” level (mean = 4.26, SD = 0.57).
2) The level of factors causing teacher collaboration network to promote information literacy skills of secondary students in overall was at the “much” level (mean = 4.49, SD = 0.61). In terms of each aspect, it was found that the aspect of school administrators’ understanding and knowledge in searching information was at the “most” level (mean = 4.68, SD = 0.56).
3) The study also found that development a collaboration network in schools, initiation of integrated teaching methods for all subjects, and supporting networks for activities outside schools can promote student information literacy skills.
Downloads
References
Association of College and Research Libraries. (2000). Information Literacy Standard for Higher Education. Retrieved 2017 November 5. URL: https://www.ala.org/acrl/ilstandardlo.html
Boonchom Srisaard. (2004). Statistical Methods for Research. 4th ed. Bangkok: Suweereyasan.
Boonruam Thiamjan and Saranya Vitchatham. (2017) Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, B.E. 2560. Bangkok: SE-EDUCATION.
Ducas, A.M. & Michaud-Oystryk, N. (2003). Toward a New Enterprise: Capitalizing on the Faculty/Librarian Partnership. College & Research Libraries, 64(1), 55-74. Retrieved 2018 August 22. URL: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/95402/.
Krit Raengsungnoen. (2011) Factor Analysis with SPSS and AMOS for Research. Bangkok: SE-EDUCATION.
Kalaya Vanibancha. (2011). Statistics for Research. 6thed. Bangkok: Thammasan
Kalaya Vanibancha. (2005). Multivariate Analysis. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
Nonglak Viratchai. (1999). Meta-analysis. Bangkok: Faculty of Edcuation, Chulalongkorn University.
Sangwan Tukpimai. (2016). Teaching Information Literacy: Role of Life-long Learning Promotion. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Surindra Rajabhat University. 18 (1), 117-127.
Sangwan Tukpimai, Saraphee Wannatrong and Supasinee Vichian. (2016). Information Literacy of Bachelor Degree Students, Surindra Rajabhat University. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Surindra Rajabhat University. 18 (2), 7-18.
Santhana Koolrat. (2013). Guidelines to Develop Teachers-Librarians Collaboration in Promotion of Bachelor Degree Students’ Information Literacy in Rajabhat Universities. Thesis Report for the Doctoral Degree in Information Education, Graduate School, Khon Kaen University.
Walter, S.L. (2003). The Librarians in the academy : Exploring the Instructional Role of Librarians in Higher Education. Washington State : College of Education Washington State University.
