Guidelines for Memory Management of Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University

Authors

  • Vatita Euacharoen Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University
  • Pornnapa Phuttaraksa Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64798/tlabulletin.v69i1.281523

Keywords:

Memory, Memory management, Memory of Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University

Abstract

This research aims to: (1) explore the institutional memory of Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University, (2) examine the current state of memory management at the university, (3) propose guidelines for effective memory management. This study employs a qualitative research approach, with a target group consisting of  13 participants, including administrators, faculty members, and staff. In-depth interviews were used as the primary research tool, and data analysis was conducted using an inductive content analysis method.

The research findings are as follows: (1) The institutional memory of Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University comprises its history and development, significant events and stories, key ceremonies, traditions, notable figures, and university symbols. The media used to preserve these memories include print materials, audiovisual media, digital media, and physical artifacts. (2) The state of memory management at the university reveals key issues, including the existence of institutional memory management policies; however, there is no continuity in these policies from the past to the present. The university lacks a dedicated repository for memory preservation, leading to scattered archival materials across various departments.
The university employs several methods to disseminate and promote awareness of its history among future generations, including exhibitions, print and video publications, commemorative events, and academic instruction related to institutional memory. (3) The proposed framework for improving memory management at Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University consists of three key components: policy implementation, memory management processes, and the acquisition of valuable historical records.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baimai, C. (2021, September - December). “Systems Approach to Modern Business Administration”. Parichart Journal Thaksin University, 34 (3), 17-36. [In Thai]

Bakhurst. (1990). Social memory in Soviet thought. In Collective remembering. Sage, as cited in Pennebaker, J. W. & Banasik, B. L. (1997). Collective Memory of Political Events: Social psychological. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Burkey, B. (2014). The Future of remembering: How multimodal platforms and social media are repurposing our digitally shared pasts in cultural heritage and collective memory practices [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Oregon.

Connerton, P. (1996). How Societies Remember. Cambridge University.

Cook, T. (1997). What is past is prologue: A history of archival ideas since 1898, and the future paradigm shift. Archivaria, 43, 17-63.

Euacharoen, V. (2019). The Development of a Management Model for the Memory of Thai Universities [Doctoral dissertation]. Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. [In Thai]

Fentress, J., & Wickham, C. (1992). Social memory. Blackwell.

Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory. (Edited, translated by Lewis A. C.). University of Chicago.

Jimerson, R. C. (2003). “Archives and memory.” OCLC Systems & Services, 19 (3), 89-95.

Lapwong, Y. (2014). The first survey of university museums in Thailand. University Museums and Collections Journal, 6, 1-16.

Mahidol University Archives and Museums. (2012). The memories of Mahidol University. Mahidol University Archives and Museums. [In Thai]

Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: Les lieux de mémoire. Representations, 26 (Special Issue: Memory and counter-Memory), 7-24.

Perez, G., & Ramos, I. (2013). Understanding organizational memory from the integrated management systems (ERP). Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 10(3), 541-560.

Prasitratsin, S. (2012). Research methodology in social sciences (15th ed.). Samlada Limited Partnership. [In Thai]

Prudtikul, S. (1990). Archives Unit 5. In Special Information Characteristics Course Materials, Units 1-8. Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. [In Thai]

Sribouban, A. (2024). The guidelines for developing the information library as an identity learning resource of King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi. TLA Research Journal, 17 (2), 118-133. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tla_research/article/view/271205/185962 [In Thai]

Stamati, T. & Papadopoulos, T. (2012). Corporate memory management: An empirical study from Greece. OR Insight, 25, 39-55. http://www.palgrave-journals.com

Stein, E. W. (1995). Organizational memory: Review of concepts and recommendations for management. Journal of lnformation Management, 15 (2), 17-32.

Tanprasert, K. et al. (2000). 90 years of the Poh Teck Tung Foundation on the path of Thai social history: An oral history. Huachiew Chalermprakiet University. [In Thai]

Downloads

Published

2025-06-22

How to Cite

Euacharoen, V., & Phuttaraksa, P. . (2025). Guidelines for Memory Management of Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University. TLA Bulletin (Thai Library Association), 69(1), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.64798/tlabulletin.v69i1.281523

Issue

Section

Research Article