The Use of Digital Technology in Academic Administration of School Administrators Under Songkhla Primary Educational Service Area Office 3

Main Article Content

Thanatchapak Sathianyuk
Arisra Boonrat

Abstract

This research aimed to: 1) study the level of digital technology use in the academic administration of school administrators, 2) compare the level of digital technology use in the academic administration of school administrators classified by age, school size, and work experience under Songkhla Primary Educational Service Area Office 3. The sample group consisted of 127 school administrators under Songkhla Primary Educational Service Area Office 3 for the academic year 2024, stratified by school size. The sample was obtained using simple random sampling through a lottery method. The research instrument was a questionnaire on opinions regarding the use of digital technology in the academic administration of school administrators under Songkhla Primary Educational Service Area Office 3. Each question's index of Item-Objective Congruence was 0.67-1.00, and the reliability was .97. The statistics used for data analysis included percentage, mean, standard deviation, F-test using one-way analysis of variance, and pairwise comparison using the LSD method. The results revealed that: 1)The use of digital technology in the academic administration of school administrators under Songkhla Primary Educational Service Area Office 3 was at a high level overall and in each aspect (ð‘ĨĖ… =4.31, SD = 0.18). 2)The results of comparing the use of digital technology in the academic administration of school administrators under Songkhla Primary Educational Service Area Office 3, classified by age, revealed that both overall and in each aspect, there were statistically significant differences at the .05 level. When classified by school size, it was found that there were statistically significant differences at the .001 level overall and in each aspect. Classified by work experience, it was found that overall and each aspect were statistically significant differences at the .001 level. 

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

āļ›āļļāļ“āļ“āļīāļāļāļē āļĄāļēāđ€āļŠāļ„. (2565). āļāļēāļĢāļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļ­āļ‡āļ„āđŒāļāļĢāļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđƒāļ™āļĒāļļāļ„āļ”āļīāļˆāļīāļ—āļąāļĨ. āļŠāļĨāļšāļļāļĢāļĩ: āļ„āļ“āļ°āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒ āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļšāļđāļĢāļžāļē.

āļžāļĢāļ°āļĢāļēāļŠāļšāļąāļāļāļąāļ•āļīāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđāļŦāđˆāļ‡āļŠāļēāļ•āļī (āļ‰āļšāļąāļšāļ—āļĩāđˆ2) āļž.āļĻ.2545. (2545, 19 āļ˜āļąāļ™āļ§āļēāļ„āļĄ). āļĢāļēāļŠāļāļīāļˆāļˆāļēāļ™āļļāđ€āļšāļāļĐāļē.āđ€āļĨāđˆāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆ 119 āļ•āļ­āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆ 123 āļ, āļŦāļ™āđ‰āļē 19.

āļžāļĢāļĢāļĐāļŠāļĨ āđ„āļ•āļĢāļžāļīāļĢāļīāļĒāļ°. (2560). āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļ”āļīāļˆāļīāļ—āļąāļĨāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļœāļđāđ‰āļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļŠāļ–āļēāļ™āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē āļŠāļąāļ‡āļāļąāļ”āļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āđ€āļ‚9āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ›āļĢāļ°āļ–āļĄāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļšāļķāļ‡āļāļēāļŽ. āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ„āđ‰āļ™āļ„āļ§āđ‰āļēāļ­āļīāļŠāļĢāļ°āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļŠāļđāļ•āļĢāļ„āļĢāļļāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāļĄāļŦāļēāļšāļąāļ“āļ‘āļīāļ• āļŠāļēāļ‚āļēāļ§āļīāļŠāļēāļāļēāļĢāļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē. āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļĢāļēāļŠāļ āļąāļāđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāļ‡āļĢāļēāļĒ.

āļžāļīāđ€āļŠāļ āļ—āļ­āļ‡āļ™āļēāļ§āļē. (2564). āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩāļŠāļēāļĢāļŠāļ™āđ€āļ—āļĻāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļœāļđāđ‰āļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļŠāļ–āļēāļ™āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđƒāļ™āđ‚āļĢāļ‡āđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™ āļŠāļąāļ‡āļāļąāļ”āļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āđ€āļ‚āļ•āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ›āļĢāļ°āļ–āļĄāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļŠāļ•āļđāļĨ. āļŠāļēāļĢāļ™āļīāļžāļ™āļ˜āđŒāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāļĄāļŦāļēāļšāļąāļ“āļ‘āļīāļ•.āļŠāļēāļ‚āļēāļ§āļīāļŠāļēāļāļēāļĢāļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē. āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļŦāļēāļ”āđƒāļŦāļāđˆ.

āļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āđ€āļ‚āļ•āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ›āļĢāļ°āļ–āļĄāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļŠāļ‡āļ‚āļĨāļē āđ€āļ‚āļ• 3. (2567). āđāļœāļ™āļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ‚āļąāđ‰āļ™āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļāļēāļ™ āļž.āļĻ. 2566-2570 (āļ‰āļšāļąāļšāļ—āļšāļ—āļ§āļ™ āļ›āļĩāļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“ āļž.āļĻ. 2566) 2567. āļŠāļ‡āļ‚āļĨāļē: āļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āđ€āļ‚āļ•āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ›āļĢāļ°āļ–āļĄāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļŠāļ‡āļ‚āļĨāļē āđ€āļ‚āļ• 3.

āļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ„āļ“āļ°āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļēāļĢāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđāļŦāđˆāļ‡āļŠāļēāļ•āļī. (2553). āļžāļĢāļ°āļĢāļēāļŠāļšāļąāļāļāļąāļ•āļīāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđāļŦāđˆāļ‡āļŠāļēāļ•āļī āļž.āļĻ. 2542 āđāļĨāļ°āļ—āļĩāđˆāđāļāđ‰āđ„āļ‚āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāđ€āļ•āļīāļĄ (āļ‰āļšāļąāļšāļ—āļĩāđˆ 3) āļž.āļĻ.2553. āļāļĢāļļāļ‡āđ€āļ—āļžāļĄāļŦāļēāļ™āļ„āļĢ: āļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāļ™āļēāļĒāļāļĢāļąāļāļĄāļ™āļ•āļĢāļĩ āļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāļ›āļĨāļąāļ”āļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļĢāļ§āļ‡āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ˜āļīāļāļēāļĢ.

āļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ˜āļīāļāļēāļĢāļ āļēāļ„ 9. (2565). āļ„āļđāđˆāļĄāļ·āļ­āļāļēāļĢāļ›āļāļīāļšāļąāļ•āļīāļ‡āļēāļ™ āļāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āļ—āļģāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļŠāļēāļĢāļŠāļ™āđ€āļ—āļĻāļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē. āļ‰āļ°āđ€āļŠāļīāļ‡āđ€āļ—āļĢāļē: āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļĒāļļāļ—āļ˜āļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē āļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ˜āļīāļāļēāļĢāļ āļēāļ„ 9.

āļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāđ€āļĨāļ‚āļēāļ˜āļīāļāļēāļĢāļ„āļ“āļ°āļĢāļąāļāļĄāļ™āļ•āļĢāļĩ. (2566). āļ„āļģāđāļ–āļĨāļ‡āļ™āđ‚āļĒāļšāļēāļĒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ„āļ“āļ°āļĢāļąāļāļĄāļ™āļ•āļĢāļĩ. āļāļĢāļļāļ‡āđ€āļ—āļžāļŊ: āļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāļžāļīāļĄāļžāđŒāļ„āļ“āļ°āļĢāļąāļāļĄāļ™āļ•āļĢāļĩāđāļĨāļ°āļĢāļēāļŠāļāļīāļˆāļˆāļēāļ™āļļāđ€āļšāļāļĐāļē.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3): 607-610.