The Corrupt Behavior of Local Government Officials and Its Effects: A Case Study of Muang District, Songkhla Province

Main Article Content

Chetsada Noknoi
Wannaporn Boripunt

Abstract

This research aimed to compare the corrupt behavior of local government officials and the public’s opinion about the effects of this corruption, as classified by the personal factors of the public. It also analyzed the relationship between the corrupt behavior of local government officials and the public’s opinion toward the effects of this corruption. The sample used in this research comprised 322 voters from 2ongkhla province, with a questionnaire being used to collect data. The statistics used in the data analysis were percentage, mean, standard deviation, t-test, A-.5A and /earson correlation. The results showed that the corrupt behavior of local government officials was at an overall high level. The participants’ opinion toward the effects of corrupt local government officials was also at an overall high level. Hypothesis testing indicated that participants with different personal factors did not vary in how they regarded the corrupt behavior of local government officials, and the participants’ opinions toward the effects of corrupt local government officials also did not vary. The corrupt behavior of local government officials and the opinions toward the effect of corrupt local government officials are both at consistently high levels and follow the same trend. 


 

Article Details

How to Cite
Noknoi, C., & Boripunt, W. (2019). The Corrupt Behavior of Local Government Officials and Its Effects: A Case Study of Muang District, Songkhla Province. University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce Journal Humanities and Social Sciences, 36(1), 1–13. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/utccjournalhs/article/view/179062
Section
Research Articles

References

Askin, H., and Colton, R. R. 1963. Tables for Statisticians.New York: Barnes & Noble. “Candidates for the Provincial Anti-Corruption Commission of Songkhla Present Vision.”
2013, April 24. Daily News :[Online newspaper]. Available: https://www.dailynews.co. th/Content/regional/83110/ (in Thai).

“Corruption in Europe not Least as I Thought.”2014. Matichol Weekly 34, 1747: 103. (in Thai).

Cronbach, L.Y. 1951. “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal 2tructure of Tests.”Psychometrika 16: 297-334.

“Election Commission Invite Elected Chief Executive of /rovincial Administration.rganization 2ongkhla.” 2013, May 9.Daily News :.nline newspaper]. Available: https://www.dailynews.co.th/Content/politics/59968/ (in Thai).

Keeratayakom, S.2001. “Corruption in Local.rganizations Administrations: A CaseStudy of Rayong Province.” Master’s thesis, Burapha University. (in Thai).

King Prajadhipok’s Institute. 2005. Participation of Citizens in Montioring : A Study of Ad hoc Committee of the National Anti-Corruption Cases according to Constitution of Thailand 1999. Bangkok: King Prajadhipok’s Institute. (in Thai).

Lawakul, P. 2002. “Forms and Methods of Corruption in an Administrative.rganizations Authority in the -ortheast of Thailand.” Mini-thesis, -ational Institute for Development Administration. (in Thai).

Monattaraphadung, S. 2012. “Situation Corruption in Thailand.” Valaya Alongkorn Review 2, 1: 21-32. (in Thai).

Noknoi, C., et al. 2007. “Good Governance and the Participation of Citizens in Government Management.” Damrong Rajanuphab Journal 7, 23: 97-120. (in Thai).

Pariban, C. 2003. “The Problems in Operating the Offense to Fraud.” Master’s thesis, Ramkamhaeng University. (in Thai).

Piriyarangsan, S., and Phongphaijit, P. 1993.Corruption and Thai Democracy. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. (in Thai).

Sukumanphong, J. 2013. The Trend of Corruption in Thailand :.[Online]. Available: www.parliament.go.th/ewtadmin/ewt/.../article_20131025135448.pdf (in Thai).

Sutheewasinnon, P. 2008. “A 2tudy of Channels and .pportunities for Corruption in Local Organizations Administrations.” Master’s thesis, Chiang Mai University. (in Thai).

THAIPUBLICA. 2013a, December 21. Image Corrupt in 2013 Ranked Thailand Dropped from 88 Last Year to 102 from 177 Countries, the Fall was 35 Points out of 100 [Online]. Available: https:// thaipublica.org/2013/12/corruption-perceptions-index-2013/ (in Thai).

THAI/UBLICA. 2013b, December 21. IOD Indicated that the Poll from Business Sectors Show the Corruption Sharpened Bear the Cost Increase 10% [Online]. Available: https://thaipublica.org/2013/06/ iod-poll/ (in Thai).

Tipmanosing, K. 2010. “The Right of People to Participate in the Process of PublicPolicy. University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce Journal 30, 4: 160-175. (in Thai).

Yawapraphad, S.2001. Corruption and Trading Position in the Viewpoint of the Governor. Bangkok: Office of the CivilService Training. (in Thai).