Ethical Judgment of Accounting Students

Main Article Content

Kanoknate Prempree

Abstract

Ethics is important for the accounting profession. The accountants prepare annual financial statements and auditors verify and provide an opinion about them. The public, shareholders and investors use financial statements for making decisions. Therefore, the financial information must present a true and fair view of the company. However, The accountants and auditors mat face ethical dilemmas. In ethical dilemmas, ethics can help the accountants and auditors make the right decision. The accounting students will enter the accounting profession in the future. They should be encouraged to maintain high  ethical standards in their accounting profession. Therefore, the objectives of this research were to investigate the moral and ethical judgment of the accounting students. A questionnaire was used to collect the data. The finding shows the samples that comply with ‘Idealism’ are less accepting of low ethical behavior than the sample that comply ‘relativism’. The groups  that  have different moral standards have different ethical judgments. In addition, this research finds that morality relates to ethical judgment. Idealism has a positive significant relationship to ethical judgment. On the other hand, relativism has a negative significant relationship to ethical judgment.

Article Details

How to Cite
Prempree, K. (2019). Ethical Judgment of Accounting Students. University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce Journal Humanities and Social Sciences, 35(3), 68–80. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/utccjournalhs/article/view/195946
Section
Research Articles

References

Abdolmohammadi, M.J., Fedorwicz, J., and Davis, O. 2009. “Accounting's’ Cognitive Styles and Ethical Reasoning: A Comparison across 15 Years. ” Journal of Accounting Education 27: 185-196.


Armstroung, M.B., Ketz, J.E., and Owsen, D. 2003. “Ethics Education in Accounting: Moving Toward Ethical Motivation and Ethical Behavior.” Journal of Accounting Education 21: 1-16.


Brandon, D.M., et al. 2007. “The Joint Influence of Client Attributes and Cognitive Moral Development on Students’
Ethical Judgments.” Journal of Accounting Education 25: 59-73.


Dellaportas, S. 2006. “Marking a Difference with a Discrete Course on Accounting Ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics 65: 391-404.


Emerson, T.L.N., and Conroy, S.J. 2004. “Have Ethic Attitudes Changed? An Intertemporal Comparison of the Ethical Perceptions of College Students in 1985 and 2001.” Journal of Business Ethics 50: 167-176.


Forsyth, D.R. 1980. “A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39: 175-184.


Forsyth, D.R. 1992. “Judging the Morality of Business Practices: the Influence of Personal Moral Philosophies.” Journal of Business Ethics 11: 461-470.


Ismail, S. 2014. “Effect of Ethical Ideologies on Ethical judgment of Future accountants: Malaysian Evidence.” Asian Review of Accounting 22, 2: 145-158.


Kumpiranon, A. 2013. “Student Opinion toward a Model for Ethical Morality Development and Social Responsibility for Thai Higher Education Students.” University of Thai Chamber of Commerce Journal 33, 1: 39-54 (in Thai).


อนันท์ คัมภิรานนท์. 2556. “ความคิดเห็นของนักศึกษาที่มีต่อรูปแบบการพัฒนาคุณธรรมจริยธรรมและความรับผิดชอบต่อสังคมสำหรับนิสตินักศึกษาในระดับอุดมศึกษา.” วารสารวิชาการ มหาวิทยาลัยหอการค้าไทย 33, 1: 39-54.


Ndubisi, N.O., Nataraajan, R., and Chew, J. 2014. “Ethical Ideologies, Perceived Gambling Value, and Gambling Commitment: An Asian Perspective.” Journal of Business Research 67: 128-135.


Oumlil, A.B., and Balloun, J.L. 2009. “Ethical Decision-Marking Differences between American and Moroccan Managers.” Journal of Business Ethics 84: 457-478.


“SEC Files Criminal Complaint Against Ex-AMAC Executives and Related Persons for Falsifying Accounts and Siphoning.” 2013. SEC News Release [Online]. No.77/2013. Available: https://sec.or.th/th/Pages/ New/ Detail_Newsaspx?tg=NEW&lg=th&news_no=71&news_yy=2556 (in Thai).


“ก.ล.ต. กล่าวโทษอดีตกรรมการและผู้บริหาร AMAC กับพวก รวม 8 ราย กรณีตกแต่งงบการเงินและทุจริตยักยอกเงินของบริษัท.” 2556. ข่าว ก.ล.ต.[ออนไลน์]. ฉบับที่ 77/2556. เข้าถึงจาก: https://sec.or.th/th/Pages/ News/Detail_News.aspx?tg=NEWS&lg=th&news_no=71&news_yy=2556


“SEC Filed Criminal Complaint Against Former T.U. Dome Fund Managers on Account of Dishonest and Account Falsification.” 2013. SEC News Release [Online]. No.71/2013. Available: https://sec.or.th/th/Pages/ News/Detail_News.aspx?tg=NEWS&lg=th&news_no=71&news_yy=2556(in Thai).


“ก.ล.ต. กล่าวโทษอดีตผู้จัดการกองทุนรวมอสังหาริมทรัพย์ ที ยู โดม กรณีทุจริตต่อหน้าที่ ทำให้ทรัพย์สินของกองทุนเสียหาย และทำบัญชีเท็จ.” 2556. ข่าว ก.ล.ต. [ออนไลน์]. ฉบับที่ 71/2556. เข้าถึงจาก: https://sec.or.th/th/Pages/ News/Detail_News.aspx?tg=NEWS&lg=th&news_no=71&news_yy=2556