A Systematic Literature Review of Resilience in Aviation Business
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this research was to synthesize the components of resilience in the Aviation business by using the documentary research technique and inclusion criteria in studying related literature consisting of 26 international journals. The results found that resilience in the Aviation business had 4 dimensions and each dimension was composed of the following key components:
1) Governance consists of 2 components; regulations and laws, and development plans 2) Resilience approach consists of 3 components; the case study, scenario, and index development 3) Resource management consists of 4 components; finance, human resources, organizational competency, and assets 4) Aviation service providers consists of 2 components; communication and collaboration. This documentary research provides a conceptual framework for future empirical research to prove the components of Aviation resilience and the relationship among them.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ลิขสิทธิ์ของบทความ
ผลงานที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของมหาวิทยาลัยหอการค้าไทย ห้ามมิให้นำเนื้อหา ทัศนะ หรือข้อคิดเห็นใด ๆ ของผลงานไปทำซ้ำ ดัดแปลง หรือเผยแพร่ ไม่ว่าทั้งหมดหรือบางส่วนโดยไม่ได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษรจากมหาวิทยาลัยหอการค้าไทยก่อน
References
Abdeen, F. N., Fernando, T., Kulatunga, U., Hettige, S., & Ranasinghe, K. D. A. (2021). Challenges in multi-agency collaboration in Disaster Management: A Sri Lankan perspective. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 62, 102399. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102399
Adjekum, D. K., & Tous, M. F. (2020). Assessing the relationship between organizational management factors and a resilient safety culture in a collegiate aviation program with Safety Management Systems (SMS). Safety Science, 131, 104909. doi: 10.1016/ j.ssci.2020.104909
Arora, M., Tuchen, S., Nazemi, M., & Blessing, L. (2021). Airport pandemic response: An assessment of impacts and strategies after one year with covid-19. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 11, 100449. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2021.100449
Blake, D. M., Stevenson, J., Wotherspoon, L., Ivory, V., & Trotter, M. (2019). The role of data and information exchanges in Transport System Disaster Recovery: A New Zealand case study. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 39, 101124. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101124
Bridges, D., Wulff, E., & Bamberry, L. (2021). Resilience for gender inclusion: Developing a model for women in Male‐dominated occupations. Gender, Work & Organization, 30(1), 263–279. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12672
Bruneau, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O’Rourke, T. D., Reinhorn, A. M., … von Winterfeldt, D. (2003). A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra, 19(4), 733–752. doi: 10.1193/1.1623497
Burbidge, R. (2018). Adapting aviation to a changing climate: Key priorities for action. Journal of Air Transport Management, 71, 167–174. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2018.04.004
Charles, S.H., Chang-Richards, A.Y., & Yiu, T.W. (2022). A systematic review of factors affecting post-disaster reconstruction projects resilience. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 13(1), 113-132.
Chen, Z., Wang, Y., & Zhou, L. (2021). Predicting weather-induced delays of high-speed rail and aviation in China. Transport Policy, 101, 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.11.008
Colak, O., Enoch, M., & Morton, C. (2023). Airport business models and the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploration of the UK case study. Journal of Air Transport Management, 108, 102337. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2022.102337
Coles, T. (2021). Tourism, Brexit and the Climate Crisis: On intersecting crises and their effects. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(9), 1529–1546. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2020.1858304
Dobrowolska, M., Flakus, M., Slazyk-Sobol, M., & Wawoczny, A. (2020). Strengthening professional efficacy due to sustainable development of social and individual competences—empirical research study among Polish and Slovak employees of the Aviation Sector. Sustainability, 12(17), 6843. doi: 10.3390/su12176843
Dunn, S., & Wilkinson, S. M. (2016). Increasing the resilience of air traffic networks using a network graph theory approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 90, 39–50. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2015.09.011
Fang, C., Chu, Y., Fu, H., & Fang, Y. (2022). On the resilience assessment of complementary transportation networks under natural hazards. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 109, 103331. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103331
Gössling, S. (2020). Risks, resilience, and Pathways to Sustainable Aviation: A COVID-19 perspective. Journal of Air Transport Management, 89, 101933. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101933
Gössling, S., & Higham, J. (2020). The low-carbon imperative: Destination management under urgent climate change. Journal of Travel Research, 60(6), 1167–1179.doi: 10.1177/0047287520933679
International Civil Aviation Organization. (2023). Effects of Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) on Civil Aviation: Economic Impact Analysis. Retrieved April 21, 2023, from https://www.icao.int/sustainability/Documents/Covid-19/ICAO_coronavirus_Econ_Impact.pdf
Landman, A., Groen, E. L., van Paassen, M. M., Bronkhorst, A. W., & Mulder, M. (2017). Dealing with unexpected events on the flight deck: A conceptual model of startle and surprise. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 59(8), 1161–1172. doi: 10.1177/0018720817723428
Linden, E. (2021). Pandemics and environmental shocks: What aviation managers should learn from covid-19 for long-term planning. Journal of Air Transport Management, 90, 101944. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101944
Lundberg, J., & Johansson, B. J. E. (2019). Resilience is not a silver bullet – harnessing resilience as core values and resource contexts in a double adaptive process. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 188, 110–117. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.003
Ou, J., & Wong, I. K. A. (2020). Strategic crisis response through changing message frames: A case of airline corporations. Current Issues in Tourism, 24 (20), 2890–2904. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2020.1849051
Patriarca, R., Di Gravio, G., & Costantino, F. (2017). A Monte Carlo evolution of the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) to assess performance variability in complex systems. Safety Science, 91, 49–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.07.016
Reichardt, U., Ulfarsson, G. F., & Pétursdóttir, G. (2019). Developing scenarios to explore impacts and weaknesses in aviation response exercises for volcanic ash eruptions in Europe. Journal of Air Transport Management, 79, 101684. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.101684
Scott, J. (2014). A matter of record: Documentary sources in social research. Oxford: Wiley.
Steen, R., & Ferreira, P. (2020). Resilient flood-risk management at the municipal level through the lens of the Functional Resonance Analysis Model. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 204, 107150. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107150
Stroeve, S. H., & Everdij, M. H. C. (2017). Agent-based modelling and mental simulation for resilience engineering in air transport. Safety Science, 93, 29–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.11.003
Tabares, D. A. (2021). An airport operations proposal for a pandemic-free air travel. Journal of Air Transport Management, 90, 101943. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101943
Tisdall, L., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, A. (2021). Covid-19 impacts on general aviation – comparative experiences, governmental responses and policy imperatives. Transport Policy, 110, 273–280. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.06.009
Vatankhah, S., Bamshad, V., Altinay, L., & De Vita, G. (2023). Understanding business model development through the lens of complexity theory: Enablers and barriers. Journal of Business Research, 155, 113350. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113350
Wu, C., Yan, H., Xue, W., & Liao, M. (2022). The operation of labour charter flights during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(1), 427–433. doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2022.01.003