ไวยากรณ์กับการสอนภาษาอังกฤษเพื่อการสื่อสารในบริบทการศึกษาไทย
Article Sidebar
เผยแพร่แล้ว:
ม.ค. 9, 2019
คำสำคัญ:
การสอนภาษาอังกฤษเพื่อการสื่อสาร ไวยากรณ์ บริบทการศึกษาไทย
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
การสื่อสารเป็นภาษาอังกฤษนับเป็นสิ่งสำคัญอย่างมากสำหรับบัณฑิต เมื่อประชาคมเศรษฐกิจอาเซียนมีผลอย่างสมบูรณ๋ปลายปี 2558 นักศึกษาไทยส่วนใหญ่ผู้ซึ่งจะเป็นส่วนหนึ่งของประชาคมมีโอกาสในการฝึกฝนและใช้ภาษาอังกฤษอย่างจำกัด จึงมีความเสี่ยงที่จะเป็นผู้มีความสมารถทางภาษาด้อยกว่าเพื่อนบ้านในอาเซียน การรักษาสมดุลย์อย่างเหมาะสมระหว่างการฝึกฝนการพูดการสื่อสารและการใช้ไวยยากรณ์อย่างถูกต้องเป็นหลักสำคัญสำหรับการเขียน จะทำให้ผู้เรียนมีความสามารถในการใช้ภาษาได้อย่างคล่องแคล่วและถูกต้องในระดับที่ยอมรับ การผสมผสานไวยากรณ์กับกิจกรรมการสอนเพื่อการสื่อสารจึงเป็นสิ่งท้าทายภายใต้ข้่อจำกัดทางบริบทของการศึกษาไทย
Article Details
รูปแบบการอ้างอิง
Boonpattanaporn, P. (2019). ไวยากรณ์กับการสอนภาษาอังกฤษเพื่อการสื่อสารในบริบทการศึกษาไทย. วารสารวิชาการ มหาวิทยาลัยหอการค้าไทย (มนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์), 37(2), 152–169. สืบค้น จาก https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/utccjournalhs/article/view/165589
ประเภทบทความ
บทความวิชาการ
ลิขสิทธิ์ของบทความ
ผลงานที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของมหาวิทยาลัยหอการค้าไทย ห้ามมิให้นำเนื้อหา ทัศนะ หรือข้อคิดเห็นใด ๆ ของผลงานไปทำซ้ำ ดัดแปลง หรือเผยแพร่ ไม่ว่าทั้งหมดหรือบางส่วนโดยไม่ได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษรจากมหาวิทยาลัยหอการค้าไทยก่อน
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Bax, S. (2003). The end of CLT: A context approach to language teaching. ELT Journal, 57(3), 278-287.
Belchamber, R. (2007). The advantage of Communicative Language Teaching. The Internet TESL Journal, 13(2). Retrieved from iteslj.org/Articles/Belchamber-CLT
Bosuwan, T. (2013). Common syntactic errors in interlanguage writing output: A case study of EFL undergraduates. University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce Journal, 33(special issue), 229-246.
Brown, H. Douglas. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Pearson Education.
Burke, B. (2007). Creating communicative classrooms with experiential design. Foreign Language Annals, 40(3), 441-462.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
Cowan, R. (2008). The teacher’s grammar of English. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Educational Testing Service. (2014). Test and score data summary for the TOEFL ITP Test.
Retrieved February 2, 2016, from https://www.ets.org/s/toefl_itp/pdf/toefl-itp-test-score-data-2014.pdf.
EF English proficiency index 2015. (2015).Retrieved February 5, 2016, from www.ef.co.th/epi
Foley, J. (2005). English In….Thailand. RELC Journal, 36(2), 223-235.
Ghazali, S. N., Setia, R., Muthusamy, C., & Jusoff, K. (2009). ESL students’ attitude towards texts and teaching methods used in literature classes. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 51-56.
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269-293). London: Penguin.
Jindathai, S. (2015). Factors affecting English speaking problems among engineering students at Thai-Nichi Institute of Technology. In The 3rd National
Interdisciplinary Academic Conference (TNIA 2015). Retrieved March 10, 2016, from cgel.thi.ac.th/2015/upload/files/tniac2015supassorn.pdf
Kachru, B. (1992). World English: Approaches, Issues and Resources. Language Teaching,25(1),1-14.
Knight, G., & O’Neil, M. (2007). Business explorer 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krashen, S. (1988). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
Long, M. (n.d.). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. Retrieved June 12,2015, from http.//www.mhhe.com/ socscience/foreignlang/conf/option1.htm
Methitham, P., & Chamcharatsri, P. (2011). Critiquing ELT in Thailand: A Reflection from history to practice. Journal of Humanities, Naresuen University, 8,(2),
57-68.
Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. New York: Routledge.
Nazari, N. (2013). The effect of implicit and explicit grammar instruction on learners’ achievements in receptive and productive modes. Procedia: Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 70, 156-162.
Richards, J. (2002). Accuracy and fluency revisited. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 35-49).
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Richrads, J., & Ranandya, W. (2011). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. New York:Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J., & Reppen, R. (2014). Towards A pedagogy of grammar instruction. RELC Journal, 45(1), 5-25
Savignon, S. (1997). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice (2nded.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Savignon, S. (2005). Communicative Language Teaching: Strategies and goals. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning
(pp. 635-651). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Swan, M. (2006). Teaching grammar – Does teaching grammar work?. Retrieved November 7, 2015, from www.mikeswan. co.uk/elt-applied-linguistics/teaching-grammar.htm
Swan, M. (2011). Seven bad reasons for teaching grammar – and two good ones. In J. Richards & W. Ranandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 148-152). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thailand. Ministry of Education. (2006).Developing language and communication skills. Retrieved June 12, 2015, from http://www.bic.moe.go.th/newth/images/stories/book/ed-eng-series/6issues/language-communication.pdf
Thailand. Office of Higher Education Commission. (2015). Educational Development Plan (2012-2016). Retrieved June 12, 2015, from www.mua.go.th/users/bpp/developplan/index.htm
Thailand ranks near bottom in English proficiency: Survey. (n.d.). Retrieved November 7, 2013, from www.nationmultimedia.com/business/Thailand- ranks-near-bottom-in-English-proficiency-30218838.html
Thompson, G. (1996). Some misconceptions about Communicative Language Teaching. ELT Journal, 51(1), 9-15.
Wanchai, N. (n.d.). Difficulties encountered in implementing a communicative curriculum: EFL teachers’ perspectives. Retrieved July 2, 2015, from www.culi.chula.ac.th/
research/Journal/2012/Final%20RA%20 Difficulties%20 Encountered%20 in%20 Implementing%20a%20Communicative% 20 Curriculum.pdf
Watanasin, P. (n.d.). Teachers’ perception and imprementations of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT): A Case study. Retrieved June 2, 2015, from www.human.
mu.ac.th/jhnu/ file/Journal/2013 _02_26_13_01_01-07%20อ.พัฒน์.pdf
Widdowson, H. (1990). Aspect of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wiriyachitra, A. (n.d.). English language teaching and learning in Thailand in this decade. Retrieved July 13, 2015, from www. apecknowledgebank.org/resources/
download/english%20language%20 teaching%20and%20learning%20in%20 thailand.pdf
Belchamber, R. (2007). The advantage of Communicative Language Teaching. The Internet TESL Journal, 13(2). Retrieved from iteslj.org/Articles/Belchamber-CLT
Bosuwan, T. (2013). Common syntactic errors in interlanguage writing output: A case study of EFL undergraduates. University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce Journal, 33(special issue), 229-246.
Brown, H. Douglas. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Pearson Education.
Burke, B. (2007). Creating communicative classrooms with experiential design. Foreign Language Annals, 40(3), 441-462.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
Cowan, R. (2008). The teacher’s grammar of English. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Educational Testing Service. (2014). Test and score data summary for the TOEFL ITP Test.
Retrieved February 2, 2016, from https://www.ets.org/s/toefl_itp/pdf/toefl-itp-test-score-data-2014.pdf.
EF English proficiency index 2015. (2015).Retrieved February 5, 2016, from www.ef.co.th/epi
Foley, J. (2005). English In….Thailand. RELC Journal, 36(2), 223-235.
Ghazali, S. N., Setia, R., Muthusamy, C., & Jusoff, K. (2009). ESL students’ attitude towards texts and teaching methods used in literature classes. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 51-56.
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269-293). London: Penguin.
Jindathai, S. (2015). Factors affecting English speaking problems among engineering students at Thai-Nichi Institute of Technology. In The 3rd National
Interdisciplinary Academic Conference (TNIA 2015). Retrieved March 10, 2016, from cgel.thi.ac.th/2015/upload/files/tniac2015supassorn.pdf
Kachru, B. (1992). World English: Approaches, Issues and Resources. Language Teaching,25(1),1-14.
Knight, G., & O’Neil, M. (2007). Business explorer 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krashen, S. (1988). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
Long, M. (n.d.). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. Retrieved June 12,2015, from http.//www.mhhe.com/ socscience/foreignlang/conf/option1.htm
Methitham, P., & Chamcharatsri, P. (2011). Critiquing ELT in Thailand: A Reflection from history to practice. Journal of Humanities, Naresuen University, 8,(2),
57-68.
Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. New York: Routledge.
Nazari, N. (2013). The effect of implicit and explicit grammar instruction on learners’ achievements in receptive and productive modes. Procedia: Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 70, 156-162.
Richards, J. (2002). Accuracy and fluency revisited. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 35-49).
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Richrads, J., & Ranandya, W. (2011). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. New York:Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J., & Reppen, R. (2014). Towards A pedagogy of grammar instruction. RELC Journal, 45(1), 5-25
Savignon, S. (1997). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice (2nded.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Savignon, S. (2005). Communicative Language Teaching: Strategies and goals. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning
(pp. 635-651). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Swan, M. (2006). Teaching grammar – Does teaching grammar work?. Retrieved November 7, 2015, from www.mikeswan. co.uk/elt-applied-linguistics/teaching-grammar.htm
Swan, M. (2011). Seven bad reasons for teaching grammar – and two good ones. In J. Richards & W. Ranandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 148-152). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thailand. Ministry of Education. (2006).Developing language and communication skills. Retrieved June 12, 2015, from http://www.bic.moe.go.th/newth/images/stories/book/ed-eng-series/6issues/language-communication.pdf
Thailand. Office of Higher Education Commission. (2015). Educational Development Plan (2012-2016). Retrieved June 12, 2015, from www.mua.go.th/users/bpp/developplan/index.htm
Thailand ranks near bottom in English proficiency: Survey. (n.d.). Retrieved November 7, 2013, from www.nationmultimedia.com/business/Thailand- ranks-near-bottom-in-English-proficiency-30218838.html
Thompson, G. (1996). Some misconceptions about Communicative Language Teaching. ELT Journal, 51(1), 9-15.
Wanchai, N. (n.d.). Difficulties encountered in implementing a communicative curriculum: EFL teachers’ perspectives. Retrieved July 2, 2015, from www.culi.chula.ac.th/
research/Journal/2012/Final%20RA%20 Difficulties%20 Encountered%20 in%20 Implementing%20a%20Communicative% 20 Curriculum.pdf
Watanasin, P. (n.d.). Teachers’ perception and imprementations of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT): A Case study. Retrieved June 2, 2015, from www.human.
mu.ac.th/jhnu/ file/Journal/2013 _02_26_13_01_01-07%20อ.พัฒน์.pdf
Widdowson, H. (1990). Aspect of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wiriyachitra, A. (n.d.). English language teaching and learning in Thailand in this decade. Retrieved July 13, 2015, from www. apecknowledgebank.org/resources/
download/english%20language%20 teaching%20and%20learning%20in%20 thailand.pdf
